Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;19(1):110-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.009. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

Understanding and engineering RNA sequence specificity of PUF proteins

Gang Lu  1 , Stephen J Dolgner, Traci M Tanaka Hall
Affiliations

Understanding and engineering RNA sequence specificity of PUF proteins

Gang Lu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

PUF proteins are RNA-binding proteins named for founding members PUMILIO and fem-3 binding factor (FBF). Together these proteins represent the range of known RNA recognition properties. PUMILIO is a prototypical PUF protein whose RNA sequence specificity is simple, elegant, and predictable. FBF displays differences in RNA recognition that represent divergence from the prototype. Here we review recent studies that examine the engineering of sequence specificity of PUF proteins and its applications as well as studies that increase our understanding of the natural diversity of RNA recognition by this family of proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prototypical PUF protein RNA recognition by PUM1. (a) Crystal structure of PUM1 in complex with hb NRE RNA. Repeats are colored alternately blue and yellow and side chains that contact the RNA are shown. RNA and PUM1 side chains are colored by atom type (blue, nitrogen; red, oxygen; grey, carbon; orange, phosphorous; yellow, sulfate). Side chains that contact the edges of bases are shown with blue or yellow carbon atoms, and those that form stacking interactions are shown with magenta carbon atoms. (b) PUM1 RNA recognition code. Schematic representation of recognition of uracil, adenosine and guanine by PUM1 is shown. Recognition of cytosine cannot yet be engineered, but a single cytosine can be tolerated at the 5th position in a recognition sequence. Dotted lines indicate hydrogen bonds, )))) indicates van der Waals contacts, and |||| indicates stacking interactions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Applications of designed PUF proteins. (a) Tracking of endogenous RNA by fusing designed PUM1 with fluorescent protein (GFP). An N-terminal fragment of GFP (green) is fused at the N-terminus of PUM1 (PUM1-N) and a C-terminal fragment of GFP (yellow) is fused at the C-terminus of a second molecule of PUM1 (PUM1-C). Binding of both molecules to the target RNA allows reconstitution of GFP fluorescence. (b) Understanding FBF RNA recognition by design of repeat specificity. Schematic representations of two possible models of FBF:9-nt RNA interaction are shown at the top of the figure. Side chains that likely contact the RNA bases are shown. Model 1 shows the 5th base (yellow) accommodated in the center of the protein while Model 2 shows the 9th base (yellow) accommodated near the N terminus of the protein. Model 2 requires non-canonical repeat:base interactions, some of which were observed in structures of PUM1 by Gupta, et al. [20]. One example of how site-directed mutagenesis was used to probe FBF RNA interaction is shown in the bottom figure. Opperman, et al. [10] mutated repeat 2 to recognize a guanine (orange) and found that the mutant protein preferred the sequence A7G8A9 (bracketed sequence) as predicted by Model 1 (Model 2 predicts G7U8A9, which was not bound by the mutant FBF).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Accommodation of an ‘extra’ RNA base by PUF4 and PUM1. (a) Crystal structure of PUF4 in complex with HO target RNA reveals that the 7th base is flipped away from the RNA-binding surface. This “flipping-out” of U7 is stabilized by Arg651 of repeat 3, which stacks between bases A6 and U8 and directly contacts the backbone ribose of U7. (b) Crystal structure of PUF4 T650C/C724R mutant demonstrates that Arg724 stacks between bases 4 and 5. (c) Crystal structure of PUM1 in complex with HO PUF5-BS RNA. The 6th base is flipped away from the RNA-binding surface to best accommodate the sequence. Tyr1005 in repeat 5 and Gln968 in repeat 4 stabilize the displaced U6 through van der Waals interactions with its phosphate and ribose groups, respectively. Atoms are colored as in Figure 1a.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wharton RP, Aggarwal AK. mRNA Regulation by Puf Domain Proteins. Sci STKE. 2006;2006:pe37. - PubMed
    1. Wickens M, Bernstein DS, Kimble J, Parker R. A PUF family portrait: 3′UTR regulation as a way of life. Trends Genet. 2002;18:150–157. - PubMed
    1. Murata Y, Wharton RP. Binding of pumilio to maternal hunchback mRNA is required for posterior patterning in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1995;80:747–756. - PubMed
    1. Edwards TA, Pyle SE, Wharton RP, Aggarwal AK. Structure of Pumilio reveals similarity between RNA and peptide binding motifs. Cell. 2001;105:281–289. - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Zamore PD, Hall TM. Crystal structure of a Pumilio homology domain. Mol Cell. 2001;7:855–865. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources