Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;28(24):7296-308.
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00662-08. Epub 2008 Sep 29.

Functional regulation of MyD88-activated interferon regulatory factor 5 by K63-linked polyubiquitination

Mumtaz Yaseen Balkhi  1 , Katherine A Fitzgerald, Paula M Pitha
Affiliations

Functional regulation of MyD88-activated interferon regulatory factor 5 by K63-linked polyubiquitination

Mumtaz Yaseen Balkhi et al. Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF-5) plays an important role in the innate antiviral and inflammatory response. Specific IRF-5 haplotypes are associated with dysregulated expression of type I interferons and predisposition to autoimmune disorders. IRF-5 is activated by Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and TLR9 via the MyD88 pathway, where it interacts with both MyD88 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase, TRAF6. To understand the role of these interactions in the regulation of IRF-5, we examined the role of ubiquitination and showed that IRF-5 is subjected to TRAF6-mediated K63-linked ubiquitination, which is important for IRF-5 nuclear translocation and target gene regulation. We show that while the murine IRF-5 and human IRF-5 variant 4 (HuIRF-5v4) and HuIRF-5v5 are ubiquitinated, an IRF-5 bone marrow variant mutant containing an internal deletion of 288 nucleotides is not ubiquitinated. Lysine residues at positions 410 and 411 in a putative TRAF6 consensus binding domain of IRF-5 are the targets of K63-linked ubiquitination. Mutagenesis of these two lysines abolished IRF-5 ubiquitination, nuclear translocation, and the IFNA promoter-inducing activity but not the IRF-5-TRAF6 interaction. Finally, we show that IRAK1 associates with IRF-5 and that this interaction precedes and is required for IRF-5 ubiquitination and activation. Thus, our findings offer a new mechanistic insight into IRF-5 gene induction program through hitherto unknown processes of IRF-5 ubiquitination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
IRF-5 undergoes K63-linked polyubiquitination in a MyD88-dependent pathway. (A) 293T cells transfected with a total (4 μg) of His-tagged IRF-5 (lanes 2 to 6), MyD88 (lanes 4, 6, and 7), and TRAF6 (lanes 5, 6, and 7) together with HA-ubiquitin (lanes 3 to 7) IRF-5 were affinity purified from cell lysates, using Probond Ni2+-charged resin. Bound proteins were separated on an SDS gel, and IRF-5 was identified by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-IRF-5 (upper panel) and antiubiquitin antibody (lower panel) after stripping the same blot. Whole-cell lysate was also immunoblotted with tubulin, anti-MyD88, anti-TRAF6, and anti-HA antibodies. (B) 293T cells were transfected with IRF-5v4 or IRF-5v5 and ubiquitin together with MyD88 and TRAF6. At 24 h after transfection cells were lysed, and IRF-5v4 was immunoprecipitated with Flag antibodies. IRF-5v5 was affinity purified on Ni resin. Proteins were separated on an SDS gel and immunoblotted with anti-IRF-5 and antiubiquitin antibody (upper panels). The relative levels of IRF-5, β-actin, and TRAF6 in the whole-cell lysate determined by immunoblotting are shown. (C) 293T cells were transfected with His-tagged IRF-5 (lanes 2 to 6 in the left panel and lanes 2 to 8 in the right panel), MyD88 (lanes 4 to 6 in the left panel and lanes 4 to 6 in the right panel), TRAF6 (lanes 4 to 6 in the left panel and lanes 3, 8, and 9 in the right panel) together with HA-ubiquitin (lanes 3 and 4 in the left panel and lanes 3 and 4 in the right panel) or a K63R HA-ubiquitin mutant (lane 5 in the left panel and lanes 6 and 7 in the right panel) or K48R ubiquitin mutant (lane 6 in the left panel and lanes 7 to 8 in the right panel). His-tagged IRF-5 was affinity purified on Ni resin and blotted with anti-IRF-5 (left panel) or antiubiquitin (right panel) serum. The expression of IRF-5, MyD88, TRAF6, and K48 or K63 HA-ubiquitin detected in the input cell lysates was detected by immune blotting (lower panels). (D) Ubiquitination of the endogenous IRF-5. RAW264.7 cells were either treated with DMSO or stimulated with a 100 nM concentration of TLR7 agonist R848 for 8 h to engage TLR7-MyD88 pathway that leads to IRF-5 activation. As a positive control, cells were transfected with IRF-5 together with MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin. Cells were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and ubiquitinated IRF-5 was immunopurified using antiubiquitin beads. The specifically bound proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with IRF-5 antibodies (upper panel). The total cell lysate was probed with IRF-5 (lower panel). The cell lysate from unstimulated RAW264.7 cells was immunoprecipitated with IRF-5 and immunoblotted with IRF-5 to demonstrate the expression of an endogenous IRF-5 (lower panel). Immune blotting with ubiquitin antibodies did not detect any IRF-5 (data not shown). Ub, ubiquitin; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
IRF-5 is polyubiquitinated by the E3 ligase TRAF6. (A) TRAF6−/− MEFs were cotransfected with IRF-5, MyD88, and HA-ubiquitin in the presence and absence of TRAF6. At 24 h posttransfection, cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-IRF-5 (upper panel) or anti-HA epitope antibodies (middle panel). To verify TRAF6 expression, the blot was reprobed with anti-TRAF6 antibody (lower panel). Levels of β-actin show equal loading of protein. (B) Schematic structure of C-terminal deletions of IRF-5v4. DBD, DNA binding domain; IAD, interacting domain. Amino acid regions that are deleted in the IRF-5 mutants are indicated. Flag-tagged full-length IRF-5 or its deletion mutants were transfected to 293T cells together with MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin. At 24 h posttransfection cells were lysed, and lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-Flag-coupled beads followed by immunoblotting with anti IRF-5 antibody. IRF-5 and its deletion mutants were detected in cell lysates by immunoblotting with anti-Flag antibody. (C) A schematic illustration of point mutations at TRAF6 consensus recognition motif and a deletion in IRF-5-BMv. 293T cells were transfected with murine IRF-5 (positive control), IRF-5-BMv, and IRF-5 K410/K411R together with MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin. His-purified IRF-5 was detected by immunoblotting with anti-IRF-5 (upper panel). IRF-5-BMv and IRF-5 mutant expression in cell lysates were detected by immunoblotting, and the relative levels of β-actin indicate equal protein loading. (D) Binding of TRAF6 to IRF-5 and its mutants. Cells were cotransfected with Flag-IRF-5 or its deletion mutants together with MyD88 and HA-ubiquitin expression plasmids (left). Twenty-four hours later the cells were lysed, and the lysates were precipitated with Flag antibodies; the presence of IRF-5 and TRAF6 in the precipitates was detected by Western blotting with IRF-5 or TRAF6 antibodies. The relative levels of transfected IRF-5, its mutants, and TRAF6 in the input lysates were detected by Western blotting. The IRF-5-positive band in the control sample (lane 1) was caused by a leaking well. Lysates from cells cotransfected with IRF-5, the IRF-5 K410/K411R mutant, and IRF-5-BMv with MyD888 and TRAF6 were immunoprecipitated with TRAF6 antibodies, and the levels of IRF-5 and TRAF6 in immunoprecipitated samples were detected by immunoblotting with IRF-5 or TRAF6 antibodies (right panels). The relative levels of transfected IRF-5, the IRF-5 K410/K411R mutant, IRF-5-BMv, and TRAF6 in the input lysates were detected by immunoblotting with respective antibodies. (E) The two C-terminal deletion mutants of IRF-5v5 containing the TRAF6 consensus recognition sequence PREKKL are shown schematically. The lysates of cells cotransfected with full-length IRF-5v5 or its mutants and MyD88 and TRAF6 were immunoprecipitated with Flag antibody, and IRF-5 was detected by immunoblotting with IRF-5 antibody (upper panel). The same blot was stripped of bound antibody and blotted with TRAF6 antibody (middle panel). The levels of expression of IRF-5 and TRAF6 in input lysates are shown in the lower panel. (F) Mutation in the TRAF6 consensus recognition motif of IRF-5 blocked activation of IFNA4 reporter. 293T cells were cotransfected with an IFNA4-luc reporter plasmid (10 ng) together with the indicated combination of MyD88 (10 ng), TRAF6 (10 ng), and ubiquitin (5 ng) and 10 ng each of IRF-5, IRF-5v5, IRF-5v4, and the IRF-5 K410/K411R mutant. Luciferase activity was measured 24 h after the transfections. Cells were also transfected with IRF-5, MyD88, and TRAF6 and together with TLR7 expression plasmid. Sixteen hours after transfections stimulated with 10 nM R848 for 8 h, luciferase activity was measured in cell lysates (right panel). (G) IFNA4-luciferase (Luc) reporter and IRF-5 plasmids were cotransfected into TRAF6−/− MEFs and wild-type MEFs together with MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin as indicated. The levels of DNA were kept constant in all transfection experiments, and the data are expressed as means ± standard deviations of four replicates. Ub, ubiquitin; IP, immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblotting; nt, nucleotides.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
IRF-5 associates with IRAK1. (A) IRAK1−/− 293TI1A cells were transfected with IRAK1, His-tagged IRF-5, MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin (Ub). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-IRAK1 antibody and immunoblotted with either anti-His antibody or IRAK1 as indicated. The expression of transfected plasmids in cell lysates was detected by immunoblotting with respective antibodies (lower panel). (B) 293TI1A cells, transfected with His-tagged IRF-5 (lanes 2 to 8), MyD88 (lanes 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9), TRAF6 (lanes 4, 7, and 8), or IRAK1 (lanes 6 to 9) together with HA-ubiquitin (lanes 3 to 8). IRF-5 was His purified and analyzed on an SDS gel by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-IRF-5 antibody (upper panel) and subsequently with anti-HA antibodies (middle panel). The relative levels of MyD88 IRAK1 and β-actin in input cell lysates were detected by immunoblotting with the respective antibodies.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Ubiquitination of IRF-5 promotes nuclear transport, binding to type I IFN promoters and IRF-5 stabilization. (A). IRF-5 nuclear localization of IRF-5 in IRAK1−/− cells. 293TI1A cells were cotransfected with IRF-5, MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin (Ub). Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared 24 h after the transfections, and proteins were separated on SDS gels and immunoblotted (IB) with IRF-5 antibodies. To demonstrate equal loading, blots were stripped and immunoblotted with β-actin (cytoplasmic fraction), and the purity of the nuclear fraction was demonstrated by blotting with anti-RelA antibody. Immune blotting with anti-IRAK1 antibody was used to determine the levels of ectopic IRAK1. (B) 293T cells were transfected with IRF-5, the IRF-5 K410/K411R mutant, and the IRF-5Δ (with a deletion of residues 480 to 539) mutant, and cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-IRF-5, anti-Sp1 (nuclear fraction), and anti-α-tubulin (cytoplasmic fraction) antibody. (C) The association of IRF-5 with the promoters of the endogenous IFNA and IFNB genes was determine by ChIP assay in 293T cells transfected with IRF-5, MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin as described in Materials and Methods. The sequences of the PCR-amplified promoter fragments containing the IRF-E binding site are shown. (D) Ubiquitination leads to stabilization of IRF-5. The left panel shows relative levels of IRF-5 in cells transiently expressing IRF-5, and the right panel shows IRF-5 levels in cells in which IRF-5 was coexpressed with MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin. Ethanol control is a control sample cultured in the absence of CHX. Gels were scanned, and the ratios of IRF-5 to β-actin are shown as a function of time. (E) The relative levels of ubiquitinated proteins in cell lysates from 293T cells expressing IRF-5, MyD88, TRAF6, and ubiquitin and cultured with either DMSO (left panel) or 10 μM MG132 (right panel) for 6 h. The blots were reprobed with anti-IRF-5 (middle panel) and α-tubulin (lower panel) antibodies. (F). Proposed model of molecular mechanism leading to IRF-5 activation by a TLR7/9-activated, MyD88-dependent pathway.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abbott, D. W., Y. Yang, J. E. Hutti, S. Madhavarapu, M. A. Kelliher, and L. C. Cantley. 2007. Coordinated regulation of Toll-like receptor and NOD2 signaling by K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 276012-6025. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akira, S., and K. Takeda. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4499-511. - PubMed
    1. Akira, S., S. Uematsu, and O. Takeuchi. 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124783-801. - PubMed
    1. Alexopoulou, L., A. C. Holt, R. Medzhitov, and R. A. Flavell. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413732-738. - PubMed
    1. Barnes, B., B. Lubyova, and P. M. Pitha. 2002. On the role of IRF in host defense. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2259-71. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms