Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 10;3(9):e3128.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128.

Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement

Mike H Allsopp  1 , Willem J de Lange, Ruan Veldtman
Affiliations

Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement

Mike H Allsopp et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Richards KW. Non-Apis bees as crop pollinators. Rev Suisse Zool. 1993;100:807–822.
    1. Williams IH. Aspects of bee diversity and crop pollination in the European Union. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O'Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH, editors. The Conservation of Bees. New York: Academic Press; 1996. pp. 63–80.
    1. Richards AJ. Does low biodiversity resulting from modern agricultural practice affect crop pollination and yield? Annals Bot. 2001;88:165–172.
    1. Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. The Forgotten Pollinators. Washington DC: Island Press; 1996. p. 312.
    1. Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, et al. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Cons Biol. 1998;12:8–17.