Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Oct;18(10):746-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review

Rolf H H Groenwold  1 , Anna M M Van Deursen, Arno W Hoes, Eelko Hak
Affiliations
Review

Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review

Rolf H H Groenwold et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review observational studies on medical interventions to determine the quality of reporting of confounding.

Methods: Articles on observational studies on medical interventions in five general medical journals and five epidemiological journals published between January 2004 and April 2007 were systematically reviewed. All relevant items pertaining to confounding bias were scored for each article. The overall quality of reporting was determined with an 8-point score.

Results: The MEDLINE search resulted in 2993 publications, and 174 (5.8%) articles were included in the analysis. In the majority of studies (>98%), the potential for confounding bias was reported. Details on the selection and inclusion of observed confounders were reported in 10% and 51%, respectively. The potential for unobserved confounding was reported in 60%, and 9% commented on the potential effect of such remaining confounding. The quality of reporting of confounding score was mediocre (a median score of 4 points; interquartile range 3 to 5), and scores were similar in all years.

Conclusion: The quality of reporting of confounding in articles on observational medical intervention studies was poor. However, the STROBE statement for reporting of observational studies may considerably impact the reporting of such studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources