Measurement of circulating levels of VEGF-A, -C, and -D and their receptors, VEGFR-1 and -2 in gastric adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 18609713
- PMCID: PMC2721446
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.3879
Measurement of circulating levels of VEGF-A, -C, and -D and their receptors, VEGFR-1 and -2 in gastric adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Aim: To analyze the serum levels and prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A, -C, and -D, and their receptors, VEGFR-1 and -2 in gastric adenocarcinomas.
Methods: The serum levels of VEGF family members were measured in 76 control subjects and 76 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). These measurements were correlated with clinco-pathological features and survival rates.
Results: The serum levels of VEGF-A and its receptor, VEGFR-1, were significantly higher in patients with gastric cancer than in healthy donors (t = 2.3, P = 0.02 and t = 4.2, P < 0.0001, respectively). In contrast, the serum levels of VEGF-D were significantly higher in control subjects than in patients (t = 2.9, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in serum levels of VEGF-C and VEGFR-2 between patients and controls. VEGF-C was associated with advanced tumor stage and presence of metastasis. VEGFR-1 was associated with metastasis, advanced overall stage, tumor differentiation and survival. VEGFR-2 levels were associated with poor tumor differentiation. There was no significant prognostic value for any of the VEGF family members or their receptors except for VEGFR-1 where high levels were associated with a poor overall survival.
Conclusion: Serum VEGF levels vary significantly in the same cohort of patients with variable clinico-pathological features and prognostic values. The simultaneous measurement of VEGF receptors levels in sera may overcome the limitations of a single biomarker assay.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prognostic and predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor and its soluble receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 levels in the sera of small cell lung cancer patients.Med Oncol. 2008;25(4):394-9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-008-9052-4. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Med Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18317954
-
Serum vascular endothelial growth factor A and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 as prognostic biomarkers for uterine cervical cancer.Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1612-1619. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01495-x. Epub 2019 Jun 24. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31236742
-
Human Plasma Levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, their Soluble Receptor - VEGFR-2 and Applicability of these Parameters as Tumor Markers in the Diagnostics of Breast Cancer.Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Oct;25(4):1477-1486. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0527-0. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Pathol Oncol Res. 2019. PMID: 30387014 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive significance of preoperative serum VEGF-C and VEGF-D, independently and combined with Ca19-9, for the presence of malignancy and lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;102(6):699-703. doi: 10.1002/jso.21677. J Surg Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20672317
-
Circulating lymphangiogenic growth factors in gastrointestinal solid tumors, could they be of any clinical significance?World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 7;14(17):2691-701. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2691. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18461654 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Knockdown of VEGF receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) impairs macrophage infiltration, angiogenesis and growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC).Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 Nov 15;12(10):872-80. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.10.17672. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011. PMID: 21989163 Free PMC article.
-
Radiolabeling and evaluation of (64)Cu-DOTA-F56 peptide targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 in the molecular imaging of gastric cancer.Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 15;5(11):3301-10. eCollection 2015. Am J Cancer Res. 2015. PMID: 26807312 Free PMC article.
-
125I-F56 Peptide as Radioanalysis Agent Targeting VEGFR1 in Mice Xenografted with Human Gastric Tumor.ACS Med Chem Lett. 2017 Jan 20;8(2):266-269. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00498. eCollection 2017 Feb 9. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2017. PMID: 28197324 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification and cell-to-cell variation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors.Exp Cell Res. 2011 Apr 15;317(7):955-65. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.12.014. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Exp Cell Res. 2011. PMID: 21185287 Free PMC article.
-
Serum angiopoietin-2 and soluble VEGFR-2 levels predict malignancy of ovarian neoplasm and poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer.BMC Cancer. 2014 Sep 23;14:696. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-696. BMC Cancer. 2014. PMID: 25245329 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson C, Nijagal A, Kim J. Molecular markers for gastric adenocarcinoma: an update. Mol Diagn Ther. 2006;10:345–352. - PubMed
-
- Al-Moundhri MS, Al-Bahrani B, Burney IA, Nirmala V, Al-Madhani A, Al-Mawaly K, Al-Nabhani M, Thomas V, Ganguly SS, Grant CS. The prognostic determinants of gastric cancer treatment outcome in Omani Arab patients. Oncology. 2006;70:90–96. - PubMed
-
- Miyahara R, Niwa Y, Matsuura T, Maeda O, Ando T, Ohmiya N, Itoh A, Hirooka Y, Goto H. Prevalence and prognosis of gastric cancer detected by screening in a large Japanese population: data from a single institute over 30 years. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1435–1442. - PubMed
-
- Barchielli A, Amorosi A, Balzi D, Crocetti E, Nesi G. Long-term prognosis of gastric cancer in a European country: a population-based study in Florence (Italy). 10-year survival of cases diagnosed in 1985-1987. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:1674–1680. - PubMed
-
- Al-Moundhri MS, Nirmala V, Al-Hadabi I, Al-Mawaly K, Burney I, Al-Nabhani M, Thomas V, Ganguly SS, Grant C. The prognostic significance of p53, p27 kip1, p21 waf1, HER-2/neu, and Ki67 proteins expression in gastric cancer: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 121 Arab patients. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:243–252. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical