Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;8(4):270-80.
doi: 10.2174/156802608783790901.

Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility

Affiliations
Review

Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility

Paul Thevenot et al. Curr Top Med Chem. 2008.

Abstract

Implantable medical devices are increasingly important in the practice of modern medicine. Unfortunately, almost all medical devices suffer to a different extent from adverse reactions, including inflammation, fibrosis, thrombosis and infection. To improve the safety and function of many types of medical implants, a major need exists for development of materials that evoked desired tissue responses. Because implant-associated protein adsorption and conformational changes thereafter have been shown to promote immune reactions, rigorous research efforts have been emphasized on the engineering of surface property (physical and chemical characteristics) to reduce protein adsorption and cell interactions and subsequently improve implant biocompatibility. This brief review is aimed to summarize the past efforts and our recent knowledge about the influence of surface functionality on protein:cell:biomaterial interactions. It is our belief that detailed understandings of bioactivity of surface functionality provide an easy, economic, and specific approach for the future rational design of implantable medical devices with desired tissue reactivity and, hopefully, wound healing capability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic drawing to depict the protein:biomaterial interactions which often lead to conformational changes of adsorbed proteins and the subsequent exposure of hidden proinflammatory epitopes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic drawing of fibrin(ogen) showing the approximate locations of some of the epitopes which have been implicated to be responsible for triggering foreign body reactions. The potential inflammatory epitopes include P1 (γ190–202), P2 (γ377–395), RGDS (Aα 572–575), and RGDF (Aα 95–98).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prominent fibrotic tissue formation was found surrounding poly-L-lactic acid particles which were subcutaneously implanted in Balb/C mice for 2 weeks. The presence of collagenous fibrotic tissue create diffusion barrier for drug transport from implanted particles to blood stream.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schmidt DR, Kao WJ. The interrelated role of fibronectin and interleukin-1 in biomaterial-modulated macrophage function. Biomaterials. 2007;28:371–382. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson B, Ekdahl FN, Mollnes TE, Lambris JD. The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation. Mol Immun. 2007;44:82–94. - PubMed
    1. Trumpy I, Lyberg T. In vivo deterioration of proplast-teflon temporomandibular joint interpositional implants: A scanning electron microscopic and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:624–629. - PubMed
    1. Henry CH, Wolford LM. Treatment outcomes for temporomandibular joint reconstruction after Proplast-Teflon implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:352–358. - PubMed
    1. Thornhill TS, Ozuna RM, Shortkroff S, Keller K, Sledge CB, Spector M. Biochemical and histological evaluation of the synovial-like tissue around failed (loose) total joint replacement prostheses in human subjects and a canine model. Biomaterials. 1990;11:69–72. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances