Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Mar;46(3):226-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.007. Epub 2007 Nov 22.

Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion

James O Prochaska et al. Prev Med. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare the initial efficacy of Motivational Interviewing (MI), Online Transtheoretical Model (TTM)-tailored communications and a brief Health Risk Intervention (HRI) on four health risk factors (inactivity, BMI, stress and smoking) in a worksite sample.

Method: A randomized clinical trial assigned employees to one of three recruitment strategies and one of the three treatments. The treatment protocol included an HRI session for everyone and in addition either a recommended three TTM online sessions or three MI in person or telephone sessions over 6 months. At the initial post-treatment assessment at 6 months, groups were compared on the percentage who had progressed from at risk to taking effective action on each of the four risks.

Results: Compared to the HRI only group, the MI and TTM groups had significantly more participants in the Action stage for exercise and effective stress management and significantly fewer risk behaviors at 6 months. MI and TTM group outcomes were not different.

Conclusion: This was the first study to demonstrate that MI and online TTM could produce significant multiple behavior changes. Future research will examine the long-term impacts of each treatment, their cost effectiveness, effects on productivity and quality of life and process variables mediating outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of Motivational Interviewing: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2003;71(5):843–861. - PubMed
    1. Butterworth S, Linden A, McClay W, Leo M. The Effect of Motivational Interviewing-based Health Coaching on Employees’ Physical and Mental Health Status. J Occup Healt Psych. 2006;11(4):358–365. - PubMed
    1. Butterworth S, et al. 2007. [unpublished raw data]. Grant # RO1 DP000103.
    1. Carpenter MJ, Hughes JR, Solomon LJ, Callas PW. Both smoking reduction with nicotine replacement therapy and motivational advice increase future cessation among smokers unmotivated to quit. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72:371–381. - PubMed
    1. Evers KE, Prochaska JO, Johnson JL, Mauriello LM, Padula JA, Prochaska JM. A randomized clinical trial of a population- and transtheoretical model-based stress-management intervention. Health Psychology. 2006;25(4):521–529. - PubMed

Publication types