Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls
- PMID: 18026754
- DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0445-9
Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls
Abstract
Meta-analysis offers the opportunity to combine evidence from retrospectively accumulated or prospectively generated data. Meta-analyses may provide summary estimates and can help in detecting and addressing potential inconsistency between the combined datasets. Application of meta-analysis in genetic associations presents considerable potential and several pitfalls. In this review, we present basic principles of meta-analytic methods, adapted for human genome epidemiology. We describe issues that arise in the retrospective or the prospective collection of relevant data through various sources, common traps to consider in the appraisal of evidence and potential biases that may interfere. We describe the relative merits and caveats for common methods used to trace inconsistency across studies along with possible reasons for non-replication of proposed associations. Different statistical models may be employed to combine data and some common misconceptions may arise in the process. Several meta-analysis diagnostics are often applied or misapplied in the literature, and we comment on their use and limitations. An alternative to overcome limitations arising from retrospective combination of data from published studies is to create networks of research teams working in the same field and perform collaborative meta-analyses of individual participant data, ideally on a prospective basis. We discuss the advantages and the challenges inherent in such collaborative approaches. Meta-analysis can be a useful tool in dissecting the genetics of complex diseases and traits, provided its methods are properly applied and interpreted.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018. PMID: 29218357
-
Combining molecular and genetic data from different sources.IARC Sci Publ. 2011;(163):323-36. IARC Sci Publ. 2011. PMID: 22997870 Review.
-
Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology.J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 12. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32540390 Review.
-
Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9260. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16014203
Cited by
-
Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond.Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Jun;14(6):379-89. doi: 10.1038/nrg3472. Epub 2013 May 9. Nat Rev Genet. 2013. PMID: 23657481 Review.
-
Statistical significance in genetic association studies.Clin Invest Med. 2010 Oct 1;33(5):E266-70. doi: 10.25011/cim.v33i5.14351. Clin Invest Med. 2010. PMID: 20926032 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A multicenter study to map genes for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: baseline characteristics and heritability.Cornea. 2012 Jan;31(1):26-35. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821c9b8f. Cornea. 2012. PMID: 22045388 Free PMC article.
-
Searching for genes that matter in acute kidney injury: a systematic review.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;4(6):1020-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05411008. Epub 2009 May 14. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19443624 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach.BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 2;18(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4163-6. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29499652 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources