Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Aug;55(8):1216-23.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01259.x.

Frailty in older men: prevalence, progression, and relationship with mortality

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Frailty in older men: prevalence, progression, and relationship with mortality

Peggy M Cawthon et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the association between frailty and health status, the progression of frailty, and the relationship between frailty and mortality in older men.

Design: Cross-sectional and prospective cohort study.

Setting: Six U.S. clinical centers.

Participants: Five thousand nine hundred ninety-three community-dwelling men aged 65 and older.

Measurements: Frailty was defined as three or more of the following: sarcopenia (low appendicular skeletal mass adjusted for height and body fat), weakness (grip strength), self-reported exhaustion, low activity level, and slow walking speed. Prefrail men met one or two criteria; robust men had none. Follow-up averaged 4.7 years.

Results: At baseline, 240 subjects (4.0%) were frail, 2,395 (40.0%) were prefrail, and 3,358 were robust (56.0%). Frail men were less healthy in most measures of self-reported health than prefrail or robust men. Frailty was somewhat more common in African Americans (6.6%) and Asians (5.8%) than Caucasians (3.8%). At the second visit, men who were frail at baseline tended to remain frail (24.2%) or die (37.1%) or were unable to complete the follow-up visit (26.2%); robust men tended to remain robust (54.4%). Frail men were approximately twice as likely to die as robust men (multivariate hazard ratio (MHR)=2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.55-2.72). Mortality risk for frail men was greater in all weight categories than for nonfrail men but was highest for normal-weight frail men (MHR=2.39, 95% CI=1.51-3.79, P for interaction=.01). The relationship between frailty and mortality was somewhat stronger in younger men than older men (P for interaction=.01).

Conclusion: Frailty in older men is associated with poorer health and a greater risk of mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources