Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells
- PMID: 17637670
- DOI: 10.1038/nature05965
Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells
Abstract
Although directed migration is a feature of both individual cells and cell groups, guided migration has been studied most extensively for single cells in simple environments. Collective guidance of cell groups remains poorly understood, despite its relevance for development and metastasis. Neural crest cells and neuronal precursors migrate as loosely organized streams of individual cells, whereas cells of the fish lateral line, Drosophila tracheal tubes and border-cell clusters migrate as more coherent groups. Here we use Drosophila border cells to examine how collective guidance is performed. We report that border cells migrate in two phases using distinct mechanisms. Genetic analysis combined with live imaging shows that polarized cell behaviour is critical for the initial phase of migration, whereas dynamic collective behaviour dominates later. PDGF- and VEGF-related receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor act in both phases, but use different effector pathways in each. The myoblast city (Mbc, also known as DOCK180) and engulfment and cell motility (ELMO, also known as Ced-12) pathway is required for the early phase, in which guidance depends on subcellular localization of signalling within a leading cell. During the later phase, mitogen-activated protein kinase and phospholipase Cgamma are used redundantly, and we find that the cluster makes use of the difference in signal levels between cells to guide migration. Thus, information processing at the multicellular level is used to guide collective behaviour of a cell group.
Similar articles
-
Guidance receptor promotes the asymmetric distribution of exocyst and recycling endosome during collective cell migration.Development. 2013 Dec;140(23):4797-806. doi: 10.1242/dev.094979. Epub 2013 Nov 6. Development. 2013. PMID: 24198275
-
Guidance of cell migration by the Drosophila PDGF/VEGF receptor.Cell. 2001 Oct 5;107(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00502-5. Cell. 2001. PMID: 11595182
-
Myosin II governs collective cell migration behaviour downstream of guidance receptor signalling.J Cell Sci. 2017 Jan 1;130(1):97-103. doi: 10.1242/jcs.179952. Epub 2016 Mar 31. J Cell Sci. 2017. PMID: 27034137
-
[Main components of gene network controlling development of dorsal appendages of egg chorion in Drosophila melanogaster].Ontogenez. 2012 May-Jun;43(3):163-74. Ontogenez. 2012. PMID: 22834131 Review. Russian.
-
Cell migration in invertebrates: clues from border and distal tip cells.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Aug;11(4):457-63. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00217-3. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001. PMID: 11448633 Review.
Cited by
-
Cell migration.Compr Physiol. 2012 Oct;2(4):2369-92. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110012. Compr Physiol. 2012. PMID: 23720251 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microtubules and Lis-1/NudE/dynein regulate invasive cell-on-cell migration in Drosophila.PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040632. Epub 2012 Jul 13. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22808215 Free PMC article.
-
Hemocyte-secreted type IV collagen enhances BMP signaling to guide renal tubule morphogenesis in Drosophila.Dev Cell. 2010 Aug 17;19(2):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.019. Dev Cell. 2010. PMID: 20708591 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced optical imaging in living embryos.Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010 Oct;67(20):3489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0440-5. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010. PMID: 20614161 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rap1 GTPase promotes coordinated collective cell migration in vivo.Mol Biol Cell. 2018 Nov 1;29(22):2656-2673. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-12-0752. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Mol Biol Cell. 2018. PMID: 30156466 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials