Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity reduces fitness in experimentally infected mice
- PMID: 17603099
- PMCID: PMC1950649
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.074815
Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity reduces fitness in experimentally infected mice
Abstract
It is often suggested that heterozygosity at major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci confers enhanced resistance to infectious diseases (heterozygote advantage, HA, hypothesis), and overdominant selection should contribute to the evolution of these highly polymorphic genes. The evidence for the HA hypothesis is mixed and mainly from laboratory studies on inbred congenic mice, leaving the importance of MHC heterozygosity for natural populations unclear. We tested the HA hypothesis by infecting mice, produced by crossbreeding congenic C57BL/10 with wild ones, with different strains of Salmonella, both in laboratory and in large population enclosures. In the laboratory, we found that MHC influenced resistance, despite interacting wild-derived background loci. Surprisingly, resistance was mostly recessive rather than dominant, unlike in most inbred mouse strains, and it was never overdominant. In the enclosures, heterozygotes did not show better resistance, survival, or reproductive success compared to homozygotes. On the contrary, infected heterozygous females produced significantly fewer pups than homozygotes. Our results show that MHC effects are not masked on an outbred genetic background, and that MHC heterozygosity provides no immunological benefits when resistance is recessive, and can actually reduce fitness. These findings challenge the HA hypothesis and emphasize the need for studies on wild, genetically diverse species.
Figures
Similar articles
-
MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11260-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162006499. Epub 2002 Aug 12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. PMID: 12177415 Free PMC article.
-
Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote superiority during coinfection.Infect Immun. 2003 Apr;71(4):2079-86. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.4.2079-2086.2003. Infect Immun. 2003. PMID: 12654829 Free PMC article.
-
Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity enhances reproductive success.Mol Ecol. 2011 Apr;20(7):1546-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05009.x. Epub 2011 Feb 3. Mol Ecol. 2011. PMID: 21291500
-
Genetic basis for MHC-dependent mate choice.Adv Genet. 2007;59:129-45. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(07)59005-X. Adv Genet. 2007. PMID: 17888797 Review.
-
Parasites and individual major histocompatibility complex diversity--an optimal choice?Microbes Infect. 2004 Oct;6(12):1110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.05.025. Microbes Infect. 2004. PMID: 15380781 Review.
Cited by
-
Putative SNPs in Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 Genes Conferring Susceptibility to Natural Infection of Haemonchus Contortus in Southern Indian Sheep.Acta Parasitol. 2024 Mar;69(1):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s11686-023-00778-8. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Acta Parasitol. 2024. PMID: 38240996
-
Differential MHC class I expression in distinct leukocyte subsets.BMC Immunol. 2011 Jul 15;12:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-12-39. BMC Immunol. 2011. PMID: 21762519 Free PMC article.
-
Female partner preferences enhance offspring ability to survive an infection.BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Jan 23;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-14. BMC Evol Biol. 2014. PMID: 24450606 Free PMC article.
-
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterozygote superiority to natural multi-parasite infections in the water vole (Arvicola terrestris).Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1119-28. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1525. Proc Biol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19129114 Free PMC article.
-
What evolutionary processes maintain MHC IIꞵ diversity within and among populations of stickleback?Mol Ecol. 2021 Apr;30(7):1659-1671. doi: 10.1111/mec.15840. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Mol Ecol. 2021. PMID: 33576071 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Apanius, V., D. Penn, P. R. Slev, L. R. Ruff and W. K. Potts, 1997. The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 17: 179–224. - PubMed
-
- Arkush, K. D., A. R. Giese, H. L. Mendonca, A. M. McBride, G. D. Marty et al., 2002. Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 966–975.
-
- Bernatchez, L., and C. Landry, 2003. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: What have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J. Evol. Biol. 16: 363–377. - PubMed
-
- Bonneaud, C., J. Mazuc, O. Chastel, H. Westerdahl and G. Sorci, 2004. Terminal investment induced by immune challenge and fitness traits associated with major histocompatibility complex in the house sparrow. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 58: 2823–2830. - PubMed
-
- Borghans, J. A., A. J. Noest and R. J. De Boer, 2003. Thymic selection does not limit the individual MHC diversity. Eur. J. Immunol. 33: 3353–3358. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials