Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 May 16:6:58.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-58.

Paracheck-Pf accuracy and recently treated Plasmodium falciparum infections: is there a risk of over-diagnosis?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Paracheck-Pf accuracy and recently treated Plasmodium falciparum infections: is there a risk of over-diagnosis?

Todd D Swarthout et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: An assessment of the accuracy of Paracheck Pf, a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) detecting histidine rich protein 2 was undertaken amongst children aged 6-59 months in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods: This RDT assessment occurred in conjunction with an ACT efficacy trial. Febrile children were simultaneously screened with both RDT and high quality microscopy and those meeting inclusion criteria were followed for 35 days.

Results: 358 febrile children were screened with 180 children recruited for five weeks follow-up. On screening, the RDT accurately diagnosed all 235 true malaria cases, indicating 100% RDT sensitivity. Of the 123 negative slides, the RDT gave 59 false-positive results, indicating 52.0% (64/123) RDT specificity. During follow-up after treatment with an artemisinin-based combination therapy, 98.2% (110/112), 94.6% (106/112), 92.0% (103/112) and 73.5% (50/68) of effectively treated children were still false-positive by RDT at days 14, 21, 28 and 35, respectively.

Conclusion: Results show that though the use of Paracheck-Pf is as sensitive as microscopy in detecting true malaria cases, a low specificity did present a high frequency of false-positive RDT results. What's more, a duration of RDT false-positivity was found that significantly surpassed the 'fortnight' after effective treatment reported by its manufacturer. Though further research is needed in assessing RDT accuracy, study results showing the presence of frequent false positivity should be taken into consideration to avoid clinicians inappropriately focusing on malaria, not identifying the true cause of illness, and providing unnecessary treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of children with continued false-positive RDTs at clinic visit, stratified by day-0 parasite density. Legend of parasite density: ● 50–20000; ■ 20–50000; ▲ 10–20000; ◆ 2–10000

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amexo M, Tolhurst R, Barnish G, Bates I. Malaria misdiagnosis: effects on the poor and vulnerable. Lancet. 2004;364:1896–1898. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17446-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howard RJ, Uni S, Aikawa H, Leech JH, Lew AM, Wellems TE, Rener J, Taylor DW. Secretion of a malarial Histidine-Rich Protein (Pf HRP II) from Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:1269–1277. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parra ME, Evans CB, Taylor DW. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 in the plasma of humans with malaria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1629–1634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humar A, Ohrt C, Harrington MA, Pillai D, Kain KC. ParaSight® F test compared with the polymerase chain reaction and microscopy for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travellers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:44–48. - PubMed
    1. Singh N, Shukla MM. Short Report: Field evaluation of posttreatment sensitivity for monitoring parasite clearance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria by use of the Determine™ Malaria PF test in Central India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:314–316. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources