Nonrigid image registration for head and neck cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with PET/CT
- PMID: 17445999
- PMCID: PMC2713594
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.017
Nonrigid image registration for head and neck cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with PET/CT
Abstract
Purpose: Head and neck radiotherapy planning with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) requires the images to be reliably registered with treatment planning CT. Acquiring PET/CT in treatment position is problematic, and in practice for some patients it may be beneficial to use diagnostic PET/CT for radiotherapy planning. Therefore, the aim of this study was first to quantify the image registration accuracy of PET/CT to radiotherapy CT and, second, to assess whether PET/CT acquired in diagnostic position can be registered to planning CT.
Methods and materials: Positron emission tomography/CT acquired in diagnostic and treatment position for five patients with head and neck cancer was registered to radiotherapy planning CT using both rigid and nonrigid image registration. The root mean squared error for each method was calculated from a set of anatomic landmarks marked by four independent observers.
Results: Nonrigid and rigid registration errors for treatment position PET/CT to planning CT were 2.77 +/- 0.80 mm and 4.96 +/- 2.38 mm, respectively, p = 0.001. Applying the nonrigid registration to diagnostic position PET/CT produced a more accurate match to the planning CT than rigid registration of treatment position PET/CT (3.20 +/- 1.22 mm and 4.96 +/- 2.38 mm, respectively, p = 0.012).
Conclusions: Nonrigid registration provides a more accurate registration of head and neck PET/CT to treatment planning CT than rigid registration. In addition, nonrigid registration of PET/CT acquired with patients in a standardized, diagnostic position can provide images registered to planning CT with greater accuracy than a rigid registration of PET/CT images acquired in treatment position. This may allow greater flexibility in the timing of PET/CT for head and neck cancer patients due to undergo radiotherapy.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbbe/2860219/fda284cf6cce/gr1.gif)
Similar articles
-
Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):1083-92. doi: 10.1118/1.1688041. Med Phys. 2004. PMID: 15191296
-
Can positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/Computed Tomography (CT) acquired in a nontreatment position be accurately registered to a head-and-neck radiotherapy planning CT?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.041. Epub 2008 Dec 10. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. PMID: 19084350
-
Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging.J Nucl Med. 2004 Apr;45(4):543-52. J Nucl Med. 2004. PMID: 15073248 Clinical Trial.
-
PET/CT: Radiation Therapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer.PET Clin. 2022 Apr;17(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Mar 4. PET Clin. 2022. PMID: 35256302 Review.
-
Clinical implications of defining the gross tumor volume with combination of CT and 18FDG-positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):709-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.046. Epub 2006 Dec 29. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007. PMID: 17197120 Review.
Cited by
-
Practical considerations of linear accelerator-based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jul;18(4):123-132. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12105. Epub 2017 May 18. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28517492 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Gross Target Volumes Based on Diagnostic PET/CT for Primary Esophageal Cancer.Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:550100. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.550100. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33718127 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional 3D staging PET/CT in CT simulation for lung cancer: impact of rigid and deformable target volume alignments for radiotherapy treatment planning.Br J Radiol. 2011 Oct;84(1006):919-29. doi: 10.1259/bjr/29163167. Epub 2011 Jan 11. Br J Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21224293 Free PMC article.
-
Deformable versus rigid registration of PET/CT images for radiation treatment planning of head and neck and lung cancer patients: a retrospective dosimetric comparison.Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-50. Radiat Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24512755 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for the use of PET and PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in research projects.Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e544-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/46048428. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Br J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22374274 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wang D., Schultz C.J., Jursinic P.A. Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:143–151. - PubMed
-
- Paulino A.C., Koshy M., Howell R. Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:1385–1392. - PubMed
-
- Grosu A.L., Piert M., Weber W.A. Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;181:483–499. - PubMed
-
- Heron D.E., Andrade R.S., Flickinger J. Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: A brief technical report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1419–1424. - PubMed
-
- Ciernik I.F., Dizendorf E., Baumert B.G. Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): A feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:853–863. - PubMed