Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):952-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.017. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

Nonrigid image registration for head and neck cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with PET/CT

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Nonrigid image registration for head and neck cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with PET/CT

Rob H Ireland et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: Head and neck radiotherapy planning with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) requires the images to be reliably registered with treatment planning CT. Acquiring PET/CT in treatment position is problematic, and in practice for some patients it may be beneficial to use diagnostic PET/CT for radiotherapy planning. Therefore, the aim of this study was first to quantify the image registration accuracy of PET/CT to radiotherapy CT and, second, to assess whether PET/CT acquired in diagnostic position can be registered to planning CT.

Methods and materials: Positron emission tomography/CT acquired in diagnostic and treatment position for five patients with head and neck cancer was registered to radiotherapy planning CT using both rigid and nonrigid image registration. The root mean squared error for each method was calculated from a set of anatomic landmarks marked by four independent observers.

Results: Nonrigid and rigid registration errors for treatment position PET/CT to planning CT were 2.77 +/- 0.80 mm and 4.96 +/- 2.38 mm, respectively, p = 0.001. Applying the nonrigid registration to diagnostic position PET/CT produced a more accurate match to the planning CT than rigid registration of treatment position PET/CT (3.20 +/- 1.22 mm and 4.96 +/- 2.38 mm, respectively, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: Nonrigid registration provides a more accurate registration of head and neck PET/CT to treatment planning CT than rigid registration. In addition, nonrigid registration of PET/CT acquired with patients in a standardized, diagnostic position can provide images registered to planning CT with greater accuracy than a rigid registration of PET/CT images acquired in treatment position. This may allow greater flexibility in the timing of PET/CT for head and neck cancer patients due to undergo radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image registration stages displayed as red-green fused images in which regions of similar intensity are shown in yellow. (a) Original images. (b) Manual translation. (c) Rigid registration. (d) Nonrigid registration. Red = Treatment planning Computed tomography (CT). Green = Attenuation correction Hawkeye computed tomography (CT) acquired in treatment position. Figure appears in color online.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang D., Schultz C.J., Jursinic P.A. Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:143–151. - PubMed
    1. Paulino A.C., Koshy M., Howell R. Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:1385–1392. - PubMed
    1. Grosu A.L., Piert M., Weber W.A. Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;181:483–499. - PubMed
    1. Heron D.E., Andrade R.S., Flickinger J. Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: A brief technical report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1419–1424. - PubMed
    1. Ciernik I.F., Dizendorf E., Baumert B.G. Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): A feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:853–863. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances