Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study
- PMID: 16939404
- DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060615
Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study
Abstract
To compare the prediction of hip fracture risk of several bone ultrasounds (QUS), 7062 Swiss women > or =70 years of age were measured with three QUSs (two of the heel, one of the phalanges). Heel QUSs were both predictive of hip fracture risk, whereas the phalanges QUS was not.
Introduction: As the number of hip fracture is expected to increase during these next decades, it is important to develop strategies to detect subjects at risk. Quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS), an ionizing radiation-free method, which is transportable, could be interesting for this purpose.
Materials and methods: The Swiss Evaluation of the Methods of Measurement of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk (SEMOF) study is a multicenter cohort study, which compared three QUSs for the assessment of hip fracture risk in a sample of 7609 elderly ambulatory women > or =70 years of age. Two QUSs measured the heel (Achilles+; GE-Lunar and Sahara; Hologic), and one measured the heel (DBM Sonic 1200; IGEA). The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard of the first hip fracture, adjusted for age, BMI, and center, and the area under the ROC curves were calculated to compare the devices and their parameters.
Results: From the 7609 women who were included in the study, 7062 women 75.2 +/- 3.1 (SD) years of age were prospectively followed for 2.9 +/- 0.8 years. Eighty women reported a hip fracture. A decrease by 1 SD of the QUS variables corresponded to an increase of the hip fracture risk from 2.3 (95% CI, 1.7, 3.1) to 2.6 (95% CI, 1.9, 3.4) for the three variables of Achilles+ and from 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7, 3.0) to 2.4 (95% CI, 1.8, 3.2) for the three variables of Sahara. Risk gradients did not differ significantly among the variables of the two heel QUS devices. On the other hand, the phalanges QUS (DBM Sonic 1200) was not predictive of hip fracture risk, with an adjusted hazard risk of 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9, 1.5), even after reanalysis of the digitalized data and using different cut-off levels (1700 or 1570 m/s).
Conclusions: In this elderly women population, heel QUS devices were both predictive of hip fracture risk, whereas the phalanges QUS device was not.
Comment in
-
Quantitative ultrasound and hip fractures?J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Aug;22(8):1311; author reply 1312. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070331. J Bone Miner Res. 2007. PMID: 17388727 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of three bone ultrasounds for the discrimination of subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures among 7562 elderly women.J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Jul;18(7):1261-6. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.7.1261. J Bone Miner Res. 2003. PMID: 12854836
-
[Role of bone ultrasound in predicting hip fracture risk in women 70 years or older: results of the SEMOF study and comparison with literature data].Rev Med Suisse Romande. 2004 Feb;124(2):59-62. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 2004. PMID: 15095612 French.
-
Is time since hip fracture influencing the discrimination between fractured and nonfractured subjects as assessed at the calcaneum by three technologically different quantitative ultrasound devices?Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 Dec;71(6):485-92. doi: 10.1007/s00223-002-2005-6. Epub 2002 Sep 18. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002. PMID: 12232682
-
[Evaluation of post-menopausal osteoporosis using ultrasound].J Radiol. 1999 Mar;80(3):279-84. J Radiol. 1999. PMID: 10327334 Review. French.
-
[Calcium pros and cons. Is QUS available for clinical use? QUS should be used as fracture-risk assessment tool, not as diagnostic tool for osteoporosis].Clin Calcium. 2012 Jan;22(1):120-3. Clin Calcium. 2012. PMID: 22201109 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status.Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):1837-48. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1354-1. Epub 2009 Mar 4. Eur Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19259681 Review.
-
Role of quantitative ultrasound to predict fracture among institutionalised older people with a history of fracture.Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jan;20(1):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0638-7. Epub 2008 May 27. Osteoporos Int. 2009. PMID: 18504637
-
Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques.World J Radiol. 2013 Nov 28;5(11):398-410. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.398. World J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24349644 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland.Osteoporos Int. 2010 Mar;21(3):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0975-1. Epub 2009 Jun 11. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19517155
-
Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jun;21(6):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1037-4. Epub 2009 Aug 20. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19693640
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials