Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Sep;74(7):365-81.
doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00105.x.

Hormonal and local control of mammary branching morphogenesis

Mark D Sternlicht  1 , Hosein Kouros-Mehr, Pengfei Lu, Zena Werb
Affiliations
Review

Hormonal and local control of mammary branching morphogenesis

Mark D Sternlicht et al. Differentiation. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Unlike other branched organs, the mammary gland undergoes most of its branching during adolescent rather than embryonic development. Its morphogenesis begins in utero, pauses between birth and puberty, and resumes in response to ovarian estrogens to form an open ductal tree that eventually fills the entire mammary fat pad of the young female adult. Importantly, this "open" architecture leaves room during pregnancy for the organ to develop milk-producing alveoli like leaves on otherwise bare branches. Thereafter, the ducts serve to deliver the milk that is produced throughout lactation. The hormonal cues that elicit these various phases of mammary development utilize local signaling cascades and reciprocal stromal-epithelial interactions to orchestrate the tissue reorganization, differentiation and specific activities that define each phase. Fortunately, the mammary gland is rather amenable to experimental inquiry and, as a result, we have a fair, although incomplete, understanding of the mechanisms that control its development. This review discusses our current sense and understanding of those mechanisms as they pertain to mammary branching, with the caveat that many more aspects are still waiting to be solved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Murine terminal end bud (TEB) and duct morphology. (A) High-magnification carmine alum-stained whole mount of a TEB that has recently bifurcated to form two new primary ducts. Two new secondary side-branches are also present along the trailing duct (open arrowhead), as is an area of increased cellularity that may represent a nascent lateral bud (closed arrowhead). Increased stromal cellularity is apparent around the bifurcating TEB. Scale bar: 200 µm. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained section of a bifurcating TEB with an early lateral side-branch (closed arrowhead). Scale bar: 100 µm. (Image courtesy of A.J. Ewald, UCSF) (C) Schematic diagram depicting the major features of a bifurcating TEB. Notable features include the considerable proliferative activity (mitoses) within the TEBs, the single layer of TEB cap cells and multilayered pre-luminal body cells, the characteristic presence of a fibroblast-and collagen-rich stromal collar surrounding the neck of the bifurcating TEB, and its conspicuous absence beyond the invading distal cap of each new TEB. An increased number of macrophages and eosinophils is also shown. Although there is no evidence that normal ductal cells ever cross the basal lamina, thinning of the basement membrane (dashed lines) at the leading edge of the invading ducts may reflect partial enzymatic degradation and/or incomplete de novo synthesis of the basal lamina.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Provisional model depicting some of the key endocrine and paracrine pathways involved in mammary branching morphogenesis. Solid arrows indicate interactions that influence mammary branching, whereas hashed lines indicate putative interconnections between known signaling cascades or indirect interactions for which signaling intermediates (e.g., mitogen-activated protein kinase) have not yet been determined.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Affolter M, Bellusci S, Itoh N, Shilo B, Thiery JP, Werb Z. Tube or not tube: remodeling epithelial tissues by branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:11–18. - PubMed
    1. Andrechek ER, White D, Muller WJ. Targeted disruption of ErbB2/Neu in the mammary epithelium results in impaired ductal outgrowth. Oncogene. 2005;24:932–937. - PubMed
    1. Basson MA, Akbulut S, Watson-Johnson J, Simon R, Carroll TJ, Shakya R, Gross I, Martin GR, Lufkin T, McMahon AP, Wilson PD, Costantini FD, Mason IJ, Licht JD. Sprouty1 is a critical regulator of GDNF/RET-mediated kidney induction. Dev Cell. 2005;8:229–239. - PubMed
    1. Beer HD, Florence C, Dammeier J, McGuire L, Werner S, Duan DR. Mouse fibroblast growth factor 10:cDNA cloning, protein characterization, and regulation of mRNA expression. Oncogene. 1997;15:2211–2218. - PubMed
    1. Bocchinfuso WP, Lindzey JK, Hewitt SC, Clark JA, Myers PH, Cooper R, Korach KS. Induction of mammary gland development in estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Endocrinology. 2000;141:2982–2994. - PubMed

Publication types