Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Mar;16(1):17-42.
doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.

Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review

Julie A Alvarez  1 , Eugene Emory
Affiliations
Review

Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review

Julie A Alvarez et al. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Currently, there is debate among scholars regarding how to operationalize and measure executive functions. These functions generally are referred to as "supervisory" cognitive processes because they involve higher level organization and execution of complex thoughts and behavior. Although conceptualizations vary regarding what mental processes actually constitute the "executive function" construct, there has been a historical linkage of these "higher-level" processes with the frontal lobes. In fact, many investigators have used the term "frontal functions" synonymously with "executive functions" despite evidence that contradicts this synonymous usage. The current review provides a critical analysis of lesion and neuroimaging studies using three popular executive function measures (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Phonemic Verbal Fluency, and Stroop Color Word Interference Test) in order to examine the validity of the executive function construct in terms of its relation to activation and damage to the frontal lobes. Empirical lesion data are examined via meta-analysis procedures along with formula derivatives. Results reveal mixed evidence that does not support a one-to-one relationship between executive functions and frontal lobe activity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of construing the validity of these neuropsychological tests in anatomical, rather than cognitive and behavioral, terms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Psychiatry Res. 1997 Oct 31;75(3):145-57 - PubMed
    1. Trends Neurosci. 1994 Feb;17(2):75-9 - PubMed
    1. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(4):270-82 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988 Oct;10(5):565-75 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1993 Jun 17;363(6430):623-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources