Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun;32(6):808-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0129-2. Epub 2006 Apr 29.

Diagnostic strategy in cancer patients with acute respiratory failure

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic strategy in cancer patients with acute respiratory failure

Elie Azoulay et al. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Nearly 15% of cancer patients experience acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring admission to the intensive care unit, where their mortality is about 50%. This review focuses on ARF in cancer patients. The most recent literature is reviewed, and emphasis is placed on current controversies, most notably the risk/benefit ratio of fiberoptic bronchoscopy and BAL in patients with severe hypoxemia.

Background: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the cornerstone of the causal diagnosis. However, the low diagnostic yield of about 50%, related to the widespread use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients, has generated interest in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and primary surgical lung biopsy. In patients with hypoxemia, bronchoscopy and BAL may trigger a need for invasive mechanical ventilation, thus considerably decreasing the chances of survival.

Discussion: The place for recently developed, effective, noninvasive diagnostic tools (tests on sputum, blood, urine, and nasopharyngeal aspirates) needs to be determined. The prognosis is not markedly influenced by cancer characteristics; it is determined chiefly by the cause of ARF, need for mechanical ventilation, and presence of other organ failures. Although noninvasive ventilation reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and diminishes mortality rate, its prolonged use in patients with severe disease may preclude optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. The appropriateness of switching to endotracheal mechanical ventilation in patients who fail noninvasive ventilation warrants evaluation.

Conclusion: This review discusses risks and benefits from invasive and non invasive diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in critically ill cancer patients with acute respiratory failure. Avenues for research are also suggested in order to improve survival in these very high risk patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scand J Infect Dis. 1989;21(4):359-66 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 8;351(2):145-53 - PubMed
    1. Eur Respir J. 1997 Mar;10(3):695-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 4;338(23):1663-71 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;41(10):1445-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources