Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun 30:126-127:2-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

Short-term receptor trafficking in the dorsal vagal complex: an overview

Affiliations
Review

Short-term receptor trafficking in the dorsal vagal complex: an overview

Kirsteen N Browning et al. Auton Neurosci. .

Abstract

Sensory information from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is transmitted centrally via primary afferents that terminate within the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (NTS) and utilize glutamate as their major neurotransmitter. Neurons of the NTS integrate this sensory information and transmit it to parasympathetic preganglionic neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV), as well as to other areas, using principally glutamate, GABA and norepinephrine as neurotransmitters. Although susceptible to modulation by a vast array of neurotransmitters, the glutamatergic NTS to DMV synapse seems to play a minor role in the tonic modulation of gastric vagal reflexes. GABAergic neurotransmission between the NTS and DMV, however, is of critical importance as its in vivo blockade induces dramatic effects on gastric tone, motility and secretion. In in vitro experiments, however, this synapse appears initially resistant to modulation by most exogenously applied neuromodulators. Using opioid peptides as a model, this review will discuss the remarkable plasticity of the NTS-DMV GABAergic synapse. Modulation of this synapse appears dependent upon the levels of cAMP within the brainstem circuit. In particular, this review will outline how vagal afferent inputs appear to dampen the cAMP-PKA system via tonic activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Removal of vagal sensory input, coincident activation of the cAMP-PKA system, or inhibition of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors, allows receptor trafficking to occur selectively at the level of the NTS-DMV GABAergic synapse. Thus, we propose that the state of activation of vagal sensory inputs determines the gastric motor response via selective engagement of GABAergic synapses. This mini-review is based upon a presentation given at the International Society for Autonomic Neuroscience meeting in Marseille, France in July 2005.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
μ-opioid mediated inhibition of GABAergic but not glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the rat brainstem is dependent upon activation of the cAMP–PKA pathway. A: In a gastric-projecting rat DMV neuron, electrical stimulation of the adjacent NTS induced glutamatergic evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs) that were inhibited by the μ-opioid agonist, Met-Enkephalin (ME) in a concentration-dependent manner. B: In contrast, in a gastric-projecting rat DMV neuron, electrical stimulation of the adjacent NTS induced GABAergic evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) that were unresponsive initially to ME (10μM; left). Following superfusion with the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin (10μM) which itself had no effect on eIPSC amplitude (middle), re-application of ME (10μM) induced an inhibition in eIPSC amplitude (right). C: Following superfusion with forskolin (10μM), ME induced a concentration-dependent inhibition in eIPSCs in an initially unresponsive neuron. D: The “uncovering” of the presynaptic inhibitory actions of ME was dependent upon increasing cAMP levels, as shown by the inhibition in eIPSC amplitude by the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin, but not its inactive analog, dideoxyforskolin, by the stable cAMP analog, 8-bromocAMP, but not by the adenylate cyclase inhibitor, dideoxyforskolin. Furthermore, the ME-induced inhibition in eIPSC amplitude was dependent on the PKA pathway as shown by the blocking of its effect following application of the PKA inhibitor, H89, but not the PKG inhibitor, K15823. *P<0.05 vs. control. Results are expressed as mean±S.E.M.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Vagal afferent input controls cAMP levels in GABAergic nerve terminals. A: In a gastric-projecting DMV neuron from a vagally intact rat, ME (10μM) induced an inhibition in eIPSC amplitude only following activation of the adenylate cyclase pathway (e.g. superfusion with forskolin (10μM) as shown; left). In contrast, in a rat in which the vagal afferent nerves were removed either chemically (perivagal capsaicin application) or surgically (afferent rootlet rhizotomy), ME (10μM) inhibited eIPSC amplitude without the need for prior activation of adenylate cyclase (right). Indeed, further activation of adenylate cyclase (e.g. forskolin, 10μM) resulted in no further inhibition by ME. B: Vagal deafferentation increases expression of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) on GABAergic profiles. MOR-IR: red; Glutamic acid decarboxylase-IR (GAD-IR; used to label GABAergic nerve terminals): green; profiles double-labeled for MOR and GAD: yellow. Panel a. Low magnification micrograph illustrating a portion of the DVC from the control (vagally intact) side of the brainstem. Panel b. High magnification micrograph illustrating the detail of a MOR-IR profile co-localized with GAD-IR (open arrowhead). The magnification is insert “b” shown in panel A. Panel c. Low magnification, micrograph illustrating a portion of the DVC from the contralateral (deafferented) side of the same sliceasin Panel A. Panel d. High magnification micrograph illustrating the detail of several MOR-IR profiles co-localized with GAD-IR (open arrowhead). The magnification is insert “d” shown in panel B. Scale bar=20μm in a and c; 2μm in b and d.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) act as a “brake” on cAMP levels. A: ME (10μM) has no effect on eIPSC amplitude in a gastric-projecting DMV neuron (left). Following superfusion with the group II mGluR selective antagonist, EGLU (200μM), subsequent re-application of ME decreased eIPSC amplitude (right). B: Histogram illustrating that ME (10μM) inhibits eIPSC amplitude following superfusion with the group II mGluR selective antagonist, EGLU (200μM), but not the group III mGluR selective antagonist, MSOP (500μM). *P<0.05 vs. control. Results are expressed as mean±S.E.M.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andresen MC, Kunze DL. Nucleus tractus solitarius–gateway to neural circulatory control. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1994;56:93–116. - PubMed
    1. Andresen MC, Yang M. Non-NMDA receptors mediate sensory afferent synaptic transmission in medial nucleus tractus solitarius. Am. J. Physiol. 1990;259:H1307–H1311. - PubMed
    1. Baptista V, Zheng ZL, Coleman FH, Rogers RC, Travagli RA. Characterization of neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius pars centralis. Brain Res. 2005;1052:139–146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertolino M, Vicini S, Gillis RA, Travagli RA. Presynaptic α2-adrenoceptors inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission in rat brain stem. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;272:G654–G661. - PubMed
    1. Browning KN, Travagli RA. Characterisation of the in vitro effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on identified neurones of the rat dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV). Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999;128:1307–1315. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources