Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jul 28;152(3):349-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.01.015. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

Current and future centrally acting antitussives

Affiliations
Review

Current and future centrally acting antitussives

Donald C Bolser. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. .

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to highlight some important issues regarding current centrally acting antitussive drugs as well as discuss the implications of these matters on the development of future cough suppressants. Drugs that act in the central nervous system to inhibit cough are termed centrally acting and this designation is based exclusively on evidence obtained from animal models. This classification can include drugs that act both at peripheral and central sites following systemic administration. These drugs are intended to reduce the frequency and/or intensity of coughing resulting from disorders of any etiology. There are a number of central cough suppressants identified by their efficacy in animal models and the most prominent of these are codeine and dextromethorphan. Although the exact neural elements on which these drugs act are currently unknown, they are thought to inhibit a functionally identified component of the central system for cough known as the gating mechanism. The efficacy of codeine and dextromethorphan in humans has recently been questioned. These drugs are less effective on cough induced by upper airway disorders than in pathological conditions involving the lower airways in humans. The reasons for this difference in antitussive sensitivity are not clear. We propose that sensory afferents from different regions of the airways actuate coughing in humans by antitussive sensitive and insensitive control elements in the central nervous system. This hypothesis is consistent with results from an animal model in which laryngeal and tracheobronchial cough had different sensitivities to codeine. Other factors that may be very important in the action of central antitussive drugs in humans include the role of sensations produced by a tussigenic stimulus as well as plasticity of central pathways in response to airway inflammation. Resolution of these issues in the human will be a challenging process, but one which will lay the foundation for the development of more effective cough suppressants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adcock JJ, Schneider C, Smith TW. Effects of codeine, morphine and a novel opioid pentapeptide BW443C, on cough, nociception and ventilation in the unanaesthetized guinea-pig. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;93:93–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aylward M, Maddock J, Davies DE, Protheroe A, Leideman T. Dextromethorphan and codeine: comparison of plasma kinetics and antitussive effects. Eur J Respir Dis. 1984;65:283–291. - PubMed
    1. Belcher N, Rees PJ. Effects of pholcodine and salbutamol on citric acid induced cough in normal subjects. Thorax. 1986;41:74–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belvisi MG, Geppetti P. Cough. 7 Current and future drugs for the treatment of chronic cough. Thorax. 2004;59:438–440. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolser D, Poliacek I, Jakus J, Fuller DD, Davenport PW. Neurogenesis of cough, other airway defensive behaviors, and breathing: a holonarchical system? Respir Physiol. 2006;152:255–265. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances