Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar 20;203(3):607-17.
doi: 10.1084/jem.20052005. Epub 2006 Feb 27.

Intensified and protective CD4+ T cell immunity in mice with anti-dendritic cell HIV gag fusion antibody vaccine

Affiliations

Intensified and protective CD4+ T cell immunity in mice with anti-dendritic cell HIV gag fusion antibody vaccine

Christine Trumpfheller et al. J Exp Med. .

Abstract

Current human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine approaches emphasize prime boost strategies comprising multiple doses of DNA vaccine and recombinant viral vectors. We are developing a protein-based approach that directly harnesses principles for generating T cell immunity. Vaccine is delivered to maturing dendritic cells in lymphoid tissue by engineering protein antigen into an antibody to DEC-205, a receptor for antigen presentation. Here we characterize the CD4+ T cell immune response to HIV gag and compare efficacy with other vaccine strategies in a single dose. DEC-205-targeted HIV gag p24 or p41 induces stronger CD4+ T cell immunity relative to high doses of gag protein, HIV gag plasmid DNA, or recombinant adenovirus-gag. High frequencies of interferon (IFN)-gamma- and interleukin 2-producing CD4+ T cells are elicited, including double cytokine-producing cells. In addition, the response is broad because the primed mice respond to an array of peptides in different major histocompatibility complex haplotypes. Long-lived T cell memory is observed. After subcutaneous vaccination, CD4+ and IFN-gamma-dependent protection develops to a challenge with recombinant vaccinia-gag virus at a mucosal surface, the airway. We suggest that a DEC-targeted vaccine, in part because of an unusually strong and protective CD4+ T cell response, will improve vaccine efficacy as a stand-alone approach or with other modalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Immunization of T cells with one dose of anti–DEC-p24 fusion mAb vaccine. (A) BALB/c mice were injected i.p. with PBS, maturation stimulus alone (25 μg αCD40 mAb and 50 μg poly IC), 5 μg control Ig-p24 or anti–DEC-p24 mAbs and maturation stimulus, and 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 without maturation stimulus. After 17 d, splenic CD8+ T cells (top) or CD4+ T cells (bottom) were restimulated with CD11c+ DCs and peptide (AMQMLKETI, p24 197–205, 2 μg/ml), HIV gag p24 peptide pools (2 μg/ml), or medium alone for 2 d. IFN-γ secretion was evaluated by ELISPOT. (B) As in A, but immunization of BALB/c mice with graded doses of anti–DEC-p24 and a maturation stimulus. Data are representative of two to four similar experiments with two mice pooled in each experiment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Strong CD4+ T cell responses to a single dose of anti–DEC-p24 fusion mAb vaccine. (A) BALB/c mice were immunized s.c. with graded doses of anti–DEC-p24 or control Ig-p24 mAbs and maturation stimulus. 19 d later, we assessed the percentage of IFN-γ+ CD4+ cells in gated CD3+ splenic T cells using gag p24 peptide pools. One of three similar experiments with two mice pooled in each experiment is shown. (B) As in A, but several experiments showing responses to 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 or control Ig-p24 mAbs with maturation stimulus given either s.c. or i.p. to BALB/c mice. Background activity (<0.1%) of nonvaccinated mice boosted with the HIV gag p24 peptide pools was subtracted from the percentage of IFN-γ+ CD4+ cells. Each point represents two mice pooled in each experiment. (C) BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice were treated s.c. with PBS or 2 and 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 or control Ig-p24 mAbs, respectively, each with maturation stimulus. IFN-γ and IL-2 production was monitored at 19 d. Numbers are the percentage of CD4+ cells producing cytokines to HIV gag p24 peptide pool 3 in BALB/c or pool 1 in C57BL/6 mice. These experiments were repeated two to four times with similar results. (D) Comparison of immune responses of wild-type and DEC-205−/− mice to 3 μg anti–DEC-p24 vaccine and maturation stimulus. IFN-γ secretion in response to HIV gag p24 peptide pools by CD4+ splenocytes as in A. Background frequencies (vaccinated mice boosted in medium only) were <0.01% in the top right quadrants. Data are representative of two similar experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Enhanced efficacy of anti–DEC-p24 plus anti-CD40/poly IC relative to DNA and nontargeted protein vaccines. (A) C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with maturation stimulus and the proteins indicated above each panel. IFN-γ secretion was evaluated after 18 d in the spleen by intracellular cytokine staining as the percentage of IFN-γ CD4+ cells among CD3+ lymphocytes in response to HIV gag p24 peptide pool 4. Data are one of two to four similar experiments. (B) BALB/c mice were injected with 2 μg anti–DEC-p24 s.c. plus maturation stimulus, one or two doses of 50 μg DNA encoding HIV gag p24 protein i.m., or PBS. IFN-γ secretion in response to HIV gag p24 peptide pool 3 was evaluated as in A. Data shown are one of two to four similar experiments. (C) BALB/c mice were immunized i.p. with 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 or control Ig-p24 antibodies plus maturation stimulus, two doses of 50 μg DNA encoding HIV gag p24 protein i.m., or PBS. IFN-γ secretion was evaluated as in A, but the response to HIV gag p24 peptide pool 2 (containing a dominant peptide presented on MHC class I) and p24 pool 3 (containing a peptide presented on MHC class II) are shown for T cells directly stained for CD8 expression. Data shown are from one of two similar experiments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Breadth and strength of responses to DC-targeted HIV gag vaccine. (A) 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 mAb in combination with maturation stimulus was administered either i.p. to BALB/c mice (top) or s.c. to C57BL/6 (middle) and C3H (bottom) mice. 18 d later, IFN-γ secretion in spleen CD3+ T cells was measured to medium or different HIV gag p24 peptide pools. Data are representative of two to four experiments with two mice pooled in each experiment. (B) C57BL/6 mice were immunized s.c. with 5 μg anti–DEC-p41 or control Ig-p41 mAbs and maturation stimulus. IFN-γ secretion in spleen CD3+ T cells was measured at 15 d in response to medium or different HIV gag p24 and p17 peptide pools. Data shown are from one of three experiments. (C) In three experiments C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated s.c. with 2 μg anti–DEC-p24 with maturation stimulus, and 19 d later, splenocytes were restimulated with graded doses of HIV gag p24 peptide number 6 from pool 1 (QAISPRTLNAWVKVV, p24 aa 145–159) or peptide number 8 from pool 4 (VDRFYKTLRAEQASQ, p24 aa 297–311).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Long-lived gag p24-memory to DC-targeted vaccine. BALB/c mice were immunized i.m. with two doses of 50 μg HIV gag p24 DNA or i.p. with 5 μg anti–DEC-p24 and control Ig-p24 mAb with maturation stimulus. C57BL/6 mice were similarly immunized, but the fusion antibodies and maturation stimulus were given s.c. CD4+ T cells were enriched by depleting MHC II+ and CD8+ cells from the lymph node (30 wk after BALB/c immunization) or spleen (at 19 wk for C57BL/6), CFSE labeled, and restimulated with CD11c+ DCs plus the peptide pools as indicated, anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, or medium. Proliferation was evaluated by CFSE dilution at 4 d. Numbers are the percentage of CD4+ proliferating T cells. Control PBS-immunized mice showed similar proliferative responses to control Ig-p24 mAb or two doses of DNA gag p24 vaccine. Data are representative of two to three experiments on the same batch of immunized mice.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A single dose of anti–DEC-p24 vaccine elicits CD4- dependent protection at a mucosal surface. (A and B) Groups of four to six BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice were immunized as in Fig. 1 and challenged at 2–3 wk with 5 × 104 PFU of vaccinia-gag intranasally. Weight was measured for 6–7 d, and then lung virus titers were evaluated by plaque assay. Data are representative of two experiments in BALB/c and one in C57BL/6. (C and D) C57BL/6 or IFN-γR knockout mice were immunized s.c. with 2 μg anti–DEC-p24 with maturation stimulus or with PBS and challenged with 2.5 × 104 PFU of vaccinia-gag 20 d later. (E and F) CD4+ T cells were depleted from C57BL/6 immunized mice with three doses of anti-CD4 mAb or control rat Ig 1–3 d before challenge. Data shown are one of three similar experiments. Weights are expressed as average body weight, whereas vaccinia plaque-forming titers (in CV-1 cells) are shown as a mean ± SD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seder, R.A., and J.R. Mascola. 2003. Basic immunology of vaccine development. In The Vaccine Book. B.R. Bloom and P.-H. Lambert, editors. Academic Press, Boston. 51–72 pp.
    1. Berzofsky, J.A., J.D. Ahlers, J. Janik, J. Morris, S. Oh, M. Terabe, and I.M. Belyakov. 2004. Progress on new vaccine strategies against chronic viral infections. J. Clin. Invest. 114:450–462. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pantaleo, G., and R.A. Koup. 2004. Correlates of immune protection in HIV-1 infection: what we know, what we don't know, what we should know. Nat. Med. 10:806–810. - PubMed
    1. Saul, A., V. Nussenzweig, and R.S. Nussenzweig. 2004. Rationale for malaria vaccine development. In Novel Vaccination Strategies. S.H.E. Kaufmann, editor. Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. 479–503.
    1. Frazer, I.H. 2004. Prevention of cervical cancer through papillomavirus vaccination. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:46–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms