Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Nov;27(11):837-47.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20226.

Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease

Affiliations
Review

Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease

Frank G Hillary et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

The inter-related cognitive constructs of working memory (WM) and processing speed are fundamental components to general intellectual functioning in humans. Importantly, both WM and processing speed are highly susceptible to disruption in cases of brain injury, neurologic illness, and even in normal aging. A goal of this article is to summarize and critique the functional imaging studies of speeded working memory in neurologically impaired populations. This review focuses specifically on the role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in mediating WM performance and integrates the relevant WM literature in healthy adults with the current findings in the clinical literature. One important finding emerging from a summary of this literature is the dissociable contributions made by ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC and DLPFC) in guiding performance on tasks of WM. Throughout this review, it is shown that when cerebral resources are challenged, it is DLPFC, and often right DLPFC specifically, that plays a critical role in modulating WM functioning. In addition, this article will examine the relationship between task performance and brain activation across studies to clarify the role of increased DLPFC activity in clinical samples. Finally, explanations are offered for the observed increased DLPFC activation and the potentially unique role of right DLPFC in mediating WM performance during periods of cerebral challenge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
R‐values for correlational analysis between duration since diagnosis and extent of frontal cortex activation (number of active voxels) for TBI and MS samples (original data presented in Christodoulou et al. [2001] and Chiaravalloti et al. [2005], respectively).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archibald CJ, Fisk JD (2000): Information processing efficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22: 686–701. - PubMed
    1. Audoin B, Ibarrola D, Ranjeva JP, Confort‐Gouny S, Malikova I, Ali‐Cherif A, Pelletier J, Cozzone P (2003): Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS. Hum Brain Mapp 20: 51–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audoin B, Van Au Duong M, Ranjeva JP, Ibarrola D, Malikova I, Confort‐Gouny S, Soulier E, Viout P, Ali‐Cherif A, Pelletier J and others. (2004): Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 24: 216–228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A (1992): Working memory. Science 255: 556–559. - PubMed
    1. Bergerbest D, Ghahremani DG, Gabrieli JD (2004): Neural correlates of auditory repetition priming: reduced fMRI activation in the auditory cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 966–977. - PubMed

Publication types