Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;34(5):765-70.
doi: 10.1177/0363546505282623. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

Differences in torsional joint stiffness of the knee between genders: a human cadaveric study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in torsional joint stiffness of the knee between genders: a human cadaveric study

Wei-Hsiu Hsu et al. Am J Sports Med. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background: In many sports, female athletes have a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury than do male athletes. Among many risk factors, the lower rotatory joint stiffness of female knees has been suggested for the increased rate of anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Hypothesis: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees have significantly lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than do male knees at low flexion angles, despite the fact that no such gender differences would be found in response to an anterior tibial load.

Study design: Comparative laboratory study.

Methods: Joint kinematics of 82 human cadaveric knees (38 female, 44 male) in response to (1) combined rotatory loads of 10 N x m valgus and +/- 5 N x m internal tibial torques and (2) a 134-N anterior-posterior tibial load were measured using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system.

Results: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees had as much as 25% lower torsional joint stiffness (female: 0.79 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.91; male: 1.06 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.17) and up to 35% higher rotatory joint laxity (female: 26.2 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 24.5 degrees-27.9 degrees; male: 20.5 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 18.8 degrees-22.2 degrees) than did male knees (P < .05), whereas there were no gender differences in response to the anterior tibial load (P > .05).

Conclusion: Female knees had lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than did male knees in response to combined rotatory loads.

Clinical relevance: Larger axial rotations of female knees in response to rotatory loads may affect the distribution of forces in soft tissues and the function of muscles that provide knee stability. Control algorithms used during the biomechanical testing of cadaveric knees and computational knee models might need to be gender specific.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources