Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-92.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1049-5. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review

Affiliations
Review

Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review

Maurits W van Tulder et al. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Within the framework of evidence-based medicine high-quality randomised trials and systematic reviews are considered a necessary prerequisite for progress in orthopaedics. This paper summarises the currently available evidence on surgical and other invasive procedures for low back pain. Results of systematic reviews conducted within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group were used. Data were gathered from the latest Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. The Cochrane reviews were updated using the evidence summary on surgery and other invasive procedures from the COST B13 European Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Facet joint, epidural, trigger point and sclerosant injections have not clearly been shown to be effective and can consequently not be recommended. There is no scientific evidence on the effectiveness of spinal stenosis surgery. Surgical discectomy may be considered for selected patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapses that fail to resolve with the conservative management. Cognitive intervention Combined with exercises is recommended for chronic low back pain, and fusion surgery may be considered only in carefully selected patients after active rehabilitation programmes during 2 years time have failed. Demanding surgical fusion techniques are not better than the traditional posterolateral fusion without internal fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine. 2000;25:1424–1435. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barendse GAM, Berg SGM, Kessels AHF, Weber WEJ, Kleef M. Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for chronic discogenic back pain: lack of effect from a 90-second 70 C lesion. Spine. 2001;26:287–292. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Béliveau P. A comparison between epidural anaesthesia with and without corticosteroid in the treatment of sciatica. Rheumatol Phys Med. 1971;11:40–43. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/11.1.40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benoist M, Bonneville JF, Lassale B, Runge M, Gillard C, Vazquez Suarez J, Deburge A. A randomized, double-blind study to compare low-dose with standard-dose chymopapain in the treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine. 1993;18:28–34. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bontoux D, Alcalay M, Debiais F, Garrouste O, Ingrand P, Azais I, Roualdes G. Treatment of lumbar disk hernia by intra-disk injection of chymopapain or triamcinolone hexacetonide. Comparative study of 80 cases [Traitement des hernies discales lombaires par injection intradiscale de chymopapaine ou d’hexacetonide de triamcinolone. Etude comparee de 80 cas] Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1990;57:327–331. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources