Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Dec;171(4):1823-35.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047464. Epub 2005 Sep 2.

The HhH2/NDD domain of the Drosophila Nod chromokinesin-like protein is required for binding to chromosomes in the oocyte nucleus

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The HhH2/NDD domain of the Drosophila Nod chromokinesin-like protein is required for binding to chromosomes in the oocyte nucleus

Wei Cui et al. Genetics. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Nod is a chromokinesin-like protein that plays a critical role in segregating achiasmate chromosomes during female meiosis. The C-terminal half of the Nod protein contains two putative DNA-binding domains. The first of these domains, known as the HMGN domain, consists of three tandemly repeated high-mobility group N motifs. This domain was previously shown to be both necessary and sufficient for binding of the C-terminal half of Nod to mitotic chromosomes in embryos. The second putative DNA-binding domain, denoted HhH(2)/NDD, is a helix-hairpin-helix(2)/Nod-like DNA-binding domain. Although the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not required or sufficient for chromosome binding in embryos, several well-characterized nod mutations have been mapped in this domain. To characterize the role of the HhH(2)/NDD domain in mediating Nod function, we created a series of UAS-driven transgene constructs capable of expressing either a wild-type Nod-GFP fusion protein or proteins in which the HhH(2)/NDD domain had been altered by site-directed mutagenesis. Although wild-type Nod-GFP localizes to the oocyte chromosomes and rescues the segregation defect in nod mutant oocytes, two of three proteins carrying mutants in the HhH(2)/NDD domain fail to either rescue the nod mutant phenotype or bind to oocyte chromosomes. However, these mutant proteins do bind to the polytene chromosomes in nurse-cell nuclei and enter the oocyte nucleus. Thus, even though the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not essential for chromosome binding in other cell types, it is required for chromosome binding in the oocyte. These HhH(2)/NDD mutants also block the localization of Nod to the posterior pole of stage 9-10A oocytes, a process that is thought to facilitate the interaction of Nod with the plus ends of microtubules (Cui et al. 2005). This observation suggests that the Nod HhH2/NDD domain may play other roles in addition to binding Nod to meiotic chromosomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The structure of the Drosophila Nod chromokinesin-like protein. (A) A schematic comparison of the structure of the full-length Nod protein. The motor-like domain of Nod falls entirely within the first 318 amino acids at the N terminus. Shaded regions indicate the HMGN domains, the putative D-box cyclin destruction domain (see discussion), and the two HhH motifs. Note that the HhH(2)/NDD domain, as described by Doherty et al. (1996), is composed of two HhH motifs, both of which are encompassed by regions of predicted α-helical structure. (B) Sequence composition of numerous proteins containing the HhH(2)/NDD domain (adapted from Doherty et al. 1996). Listed below the Nod sequence are three of the nine sequences used by Doherty et al. (1996) to define the HhH(2)/NDD domain. The last two sequences are from the chromokinesins XKid and HKid (Funabiki and Murray 2000; Tokai et al. 1996). Cylinder represents α-helix and arrows represent β-strands. (C) The structure of existing mutants in the Nod HhH(2)/NDD domain (Rasooly et al. 1994; Zwick et al. 1999). Underlining denotes the mutations existing in nod alleles, * denotes the breakpoint in nodb17, and ** denotes that the remaining 20 amino acids are altered by a frameshift mutation in nodb1. (D) Mutants in the HhH(2)/NDD domain produced by site-directed in vitro mutagenesis. * denotes the positions of the mutated amino acids, and underlining denotes the mutations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Wild-type or mutant Nod-GFP localization stage 7 nod + oocytes. Oocytes expressing wild-type or mutant UAS-Nod-GFP were stained with DAPI (blue) and anti-GFP antibody (GFP) and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Arrowhead indicates the location of oocyte nucleus. Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
NodNDD1,2-GFP localizes within the oocyte nuclei envelope but not on the oocyte nuclei. Oocytes expressing NodNDD1,2-GFP were stained with DAPI (blue) and anti-GFP antibody (GFP) and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Arrowhead indicates the location of oocyte nucleus. Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Localization of wild-type or mutant Nod-GFP in stage 13–14 nod+/nod+ oocytes. Wild-type or mutant UAS-Nod-GFP expressing oocytes were stained with DAPI (blue), anti-GFP antibody (green), and anti-tubulin antibody (red) and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Localization of wild-type or mutant Nod-GFP in stage 7 nod/nod oocytes. FM7nodb27/y noda oocytes carrying either wild-type or mutant UAS-Nod-GFP expressing oocytes were stained with DAPI (blue) and anti-GFP antibody (GFP) and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Arrowhead indicates the location of oocyte nucleus. Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Localization of wild-type or mutant Nod-GFP in stage 13–14 nod oocytes. FM7nodb27/y noda;pol/pol oocytes carrying wild-type or mutant UAS-Nod-GFP construct were stained with DAPI (blue), anti-GFP antibody (green), and anti-tubulin antibody (red) and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Expression of wild-type or mutant Nod-GFP construct in stage 9 nod+/nod+ oocytes. Wild-type or mutant UASp:Nod-GFP expressing oocytes were stained with anti-GFP antibody and analyzed by deconvolution microscopy. Bar, 20 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshar, K., N. Barton, R. S. Hawley and L. S. B. Goldstein, 1995. a DNA binding and meiotic chromosome localization of the Drosophila NOD kinesin-like protein. Cell 81: 129–138. - PubMed
    1. Afshar, K., J. Scholey and R. S. Hawley, 1995. b Identification of the chromosome localization domain of the Drosophila Nod kinesin-like protein. J. Cell Biol. 131: 833–843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arn, E. A., B. J. Cha, W. E. Theurkauf and P. M. Macdonald, 2003. Recognition of a bicoid mRNA localization signal by a protein complex containing Swallow, Nod, and RNA binding proteins. Dev. Cell 4: 41–51. - PubMed
    1. Carpenter, A. T. C., 1973. A meiotic mutant defective in distributive disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 73: 393–428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castro, A., S. Vigneronl, C. Bernis, J. C. Labbe and T. Lorca, 2003. Xkid is degraded in a D-box, KEN-box, and A-box-independent pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 4126–4138. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources