Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Aug 25;48(17):5448-65.
doi: 10.1021/jm050090o.

Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols

Andreas Evers  1 , Gerhard Hessler, Hans Matter, Thomas Klabunde
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols

Andreas Evers et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

In this paper, we compare protein- and ligand-based virtual screening techniques for identifying the ligands of four biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). For the screening of the virtual compound libraries, we used (1) molecular docking into GPCR homology models, (2) ligand-based pharmacophore and Feature Tree models, (3) three-dimensional (3D)-similarity searches, and (4) statistical methods [partial least squares (PLS) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models] based on two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors. The comparison of the different methods in retrieving known antagonists from virtual libraries shows that in our study the ligand-based pharmacophore-, Feature Tree-, and 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)-based screening techniques provide enrichment factors that are higher than those provided by molecular docking into the GPCR homology models. Nevertheless, the hit rates achieved when docking with GOLD and ranking the ligands with GoldScore (up to 60% among the top-ranked 1% of the screened databases) are still satisfying. These results suggest that docking into GPCR homology models can be a useful approach for lead finding by virtual screening when either little or no information about the active ligands is available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources