Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Dec;12(12):2070-7.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.258.

Relationships between insulin sensitivity and measures of body fat in asymptomatic men and women

Justo Sierra-Johnson  1 , Bruce D Johnson, Kent R Bailey, Stephen T Turner
Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Relationships between insulin sensitivity and measures of body fat in asymptomatic men and women

Justo Sierra-Johnson et al. Obes Res. 2004 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether measures of body fat by DXA scanning can improve prediction of insulin sensitivity (S(I)) beyond what is possible with traditional measures, such as BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

Research methods and procedures: Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests were performed in 256 asymptomatic non-Hispanic white subjects from Rochester, MN (age 19-60 years; 123 men and 133 women) to determine the S(I) index by Bergman's minimal model technique. Height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences were measured for calculation of BMI and WHR; DXA was used to determine fat in the head, upper body, abdomen, and lower body. Linear regression was used to assess their relationships with S(I) after sex stratification and adjustment for age.

Results: After controlling for age, increases in traditional and DXA measures of fat were consistently associated with smaller declines in S(I) among women than among men. In men, after controlling for age, all of the predictive information of S(I) was provided by waist circumference (additional R2 = 0.39, p < 0.001); none of the DXA measures improved the ability to predict S(I). In women, after adjustment for age, BMI, and WHR, the only DXA measure that improved the prediction of S(I) was percentage head fat (additional R2 = 0.03, p < 0.001).

Discussion: Equivalent increases in most measures of body fat had lesser impact on S(I) in women than in men. In both sexes, the predictive information provided by DXA measures is approximately equal to, but not additive to, that provided by simpler, traditional measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources