Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays
- PMID: 15464301
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.06.008
Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays
Abstract
Pulse rate difference limen (PRDL) and amplitude modulation difference limen (AMDL) were assessed as a function of base rate and cochlear electrode location in seven (three for AMDL) subjects implanted with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ implant. The MED-EL COMBI 40+ electrode array allows deep insertion of the electrode up to the apex of the cochlea to minimize the rate/place mismatch for pulse rates below 500 pps. A three interval, two alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used to measure the difference limen. The base rate was in the range between 200 and 800 pps. The carrier rate for the AMDL measurement was 5081 pps. The PRDL increased with increasing base pulse rate. At 200 pps the average PRDL measured at the apical electrode amounted to 48.7 pps, at 400 pps the average PRDL reached 206.6 pps. No significant difference between PRDL obtained from apical or basal electrodes could be observed. AMDL was higher than PRDL at all tested base rates. The ability to discriminate rate changes is limited to base rates up to about 283 pps. The results indicate that rate changes smaller than a major third do not elicit distinguishable auditory perceptions in electrical hearing. The absence of a difference between apical and basal electrode locations indicates that a reduction of the rate/place mismatch does not improve discrimination performance.
Similar articles
-
Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.Hear Res. 2005 Apr;202(1-2):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.004. Hear Res. 2005. PMID: 15811699
-
Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays.Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):275-83. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200406000-00008. Ear Hear. 2004. PMID: 15179118
-
New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Jun;14(3):142-9. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000011. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013. PMID: 22733121
-
The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.Hear Res. 2006 Mar;213(1-2):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Jan 25. Hear Res. 2006. PMID: 16442249
-
Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec;126(11):1182-7. doi: 10.1080/00016480600672683. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 17050311
Cited by
-
Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1937-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010. J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20130202 Free PMC article.
-
Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?Hear Res. 2019 Jan;371:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 3. Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 30423498 Free PMC article.
-
[Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].HNO. 2007 Aug;55(8):613-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-006-1485-5. HNO. 2007. PMID: 17136415 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Mar;8(1):119-33. doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0068-1. Epub 2007 Jan 10. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17216383 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients.J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Sep 1;156(3):2060-2076. doi: 10.1121/10.0029023. J Acoust Soc Am. 2024. PMID: 39345135 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous