Comparison of endoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer screening in women with mammography and Pap smear
- PMID: 15332031
- DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01708-0
Comparison of endoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer screening in women with mammography and Pap smear
Abstract
Background: This study compared the experiences of women who underwent endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer vs. their experiences with breast and cervical cancer screening by mammography and Pap smear, respectively.
Methods: Women who had either flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening procedure for colorectal cancer were asked to return a questionnaire by mail. In the questionnaire, they were asked about the procedure they had just undergone and to compare it with recent mammograms and Pap smears. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed without sedating the patient; colonoscopy was performed with the patient under deep sedation (midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol administered by an anesthesiologist).
Results: Responses were obtained from 258 women (88%). Of these, 152 had colonoscopy and 106 had flexible sigmoidoscopy. A total of 72% of respondents found colonoscopy to be a comfortable test. Only 26% found flexible sigmoidoscopy uncomfortable, which was similar to mammography and Pap smear, at 22%. In terms of the test considered to be the most embarrassing, the highest response rate (38%) was for the Pap smear. Most women had no preference as to the gender of the endoscopist, but 46% preferred a woman doctor for a Pap smear (p < 0.001). Preparation was regarded as the worst part of the colonoscopy procedure; for flexible sigmoidoscopy, the procedure itself and the preparation were equivalent.
Conclusions: Women found flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy comfortable and less embarrassing than a Pap smear or a mammography. There was no preference with respect to the gender of the physician who performed the colorectal screening procedures, unlike the Pap smear. Most respondents would have the procedure again and would recommend it to others.
Similar articles
-
Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention.J Med Screen. 2005;12(2):89-95. doi: 10.1258/0969141053908294. J Med Screen. 2005. PMID: 15949120
-
Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.Acad Radiol. 2005 Apr;12(4):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.12.024. Acad Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15831418
-
Barriers for Compliance to Breast, Colorectal, and Cervical Screening Cancer Tests among Hispanic Patients.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26703676 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.13.1.1. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000. PMID: 10682879 Review.
-
Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):748-57. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629. Epub 2008 Apr 1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008. PMID: 18381468 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: a literature review and pilot study.Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;23(3):203-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/903545. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19319384 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;22(1):41-7. doi: 10.1155/2008/107467. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18209780 Free PMC article.
-
Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0445-4. Epub 2007 Nov 21. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18030540 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials