Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Jan;64(1):29-33.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.022905. Epub 2004 Jun 18.

Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement

F Tubach  1 , P Ravaud, G Baron, B Falissard, I Logeart, N Bellamy, C Bombardier, D Felson, M Hochberg, D van der Heijde, M Dougados
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement

F Tubach et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: In clinical trials, at the group level, results are usually reported as mean and standard deviation of the change in score, which is not meaningful for most readers.

Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, and functional impairment in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: A prospective multicentre 4 week cohort study involving 1362 outpatients with knee or hip OA was carried out. Data on assessment of pain and patient's global assessment, measured on visual analogue scales, and functional impairment, measured on the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale, were collected at baseline and final visits. Patients assessed their response to treatment on a five point Likert scale at the final visit. An anchoring method based on the patient's opinion was used. The MCII was estimated in a subgroup of 814 patients (603 with knee OA, 211 with hip OA).

Results: For knee and hip OA, MCII for absolute (and relative) changes were, respectively, (a) -19.9 mm (-40.8%) and -15.3 mm (-32.0%) for pain; (b) -18.3 mm (-39.0%) and -15.2 mm (-32.6%) for patient's global assessment; (c) -9.1 (-26.0%) and -7.9 (-21.1%) for WOMAC function subscale score. The MCII is affected by the initial degree of severity of the symptoms but not by age, disease duration, or sex.

Conclusion: Using criteria such as MCII in clinical trials would provide meaningful information which would help in interpreting the results by expressing them as a proportion of improved patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aspects of the cumulative distribution function used to determine the MCII (changes in pain score in patients with knee OA; n = 265). Among patients considering their response to treatment as good on a five point Likert scale, 75% experienced a decrease in pain between baseline and final visit of >19.9 mm on a 0–100 mm VAS (a change between –100 mm and –19.9 mm).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients' assessment of their response to treatment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505-14 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1992 Mar;19(3):451-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances