Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities
- PMID: 15187053
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720
Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities
Abstract
Context: Despite the importance of diversity of cancer trial participants with regard to race, ethnicity, age, and sex, there is little recent information about the representation of these groups in clinical trials.
Objective: To characterize the representation of racial and ethnic minorities, the elderly, and women in cancer trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.
Design, setting, and patients: Cross-sectional population-based analysis of all participants in therapeutic nonsurgical National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Cooperative Group breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer clinical trials in 2000 through 2002. In a separate analysis, the ethnic distribution of patients enrolled in 2000 through 2002 was compared with those enrolled in 1996 through 1998, using logistic regression models to estimate the relative risk ratio of enrollment for racial and ethnic minorities to that of white patients during these time periods.
Main outcome measure: Enrollment fraction, defined as the number of trial enrollees divided by the estimated US cancer cases in each race and age subgroup.
Results: Cancer research participation varied significantly across racial/ethnic and age groups. Compared with a 1.8% enrollment fraction among white patients, lower enrollment fractions were noted in Hispanic (1.3%; odds ratio [OR] vs whites, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.77; P<.001) and black (1.3%; OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.74; P<.001) patients. There was a strong relationship between age and enrollment fraction, with trial participants 30 to 64 years of age representing 3.0% of incident cancer patients in that age group, in comparison to 1.3% of 65- to 74-year-old patients and 0.5% of patients 75 years of age and older. This inverse relationship between age and trial enrollment fraction was consistent across racial and ethnic groups. Although the total number of trial participants increased during our study period, the representation of racial and ethnic minorities decreased. In comparison to whites, after adjusting for age, cancer type, and sex, patients enrolled in 2000 through 2002 were 24% less likely to be black (adjusted relative risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.89; P<.001). Men were more likely than women to enroll in colorectal cancer trials (enrollment fractions: 2.1% vs 1.6%, respectively; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.24-1.35; P<.001) and lung cancer trials (enrollment fractions: 0.9% vs 0.7%, respectively; OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16-1.31; P<.001).
Conclusions: Enrollment in cancer trials is low for all patient groups. Racial and ethnic minorities, women, and the elderly were less likely to enroll in cooperative group cancer trials than were whites, men, and younger patients, respectively. The proportion of trial participants who are black has declined in recent years.
Comment in
-
Disparities in participation in cancer clinical trials.JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):922; author reply 922-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.922-a. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15328321 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities.Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3328-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9500-y. Epub 2007 Aug 8. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17682824
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Participants in Precision Oncology Clinical Studies.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33205. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34748007 Free PMC article.
-
Age-, sex-, and race-based differences among patients enrolled versus not enrolled in acute lung injury clinical trials.Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1450-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de451b. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20386308 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, Female, and Older Individuals in Vaccine Clinical Trials.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33606033 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24643646 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tracking the dropout patients of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with locally advanced oral cavity cancer.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08420-4. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34078311 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of surgery and adjuvant therapy in older patients with colorectal cancer: a STROBE-compliant article.Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e266. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000266. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. PMID: 25526455 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The SEER Program's evolution: supporting clinically meaningful population-level research.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Aug 1;2024(65):110-117. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae022. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024. PMID: 39102886 Free PMC article.
-
Palliative chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients 80 years of age and older.Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):144-53. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2996. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Curr Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27330342 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and ethnic minority patient participation in N-of-1 trials: perspectives of healthcare providers and patients.Per Med. 2021 Jul;18(4):347-359. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0166. Epub 2021 May 28. Per Med. 2021. PMID: 34047197 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical