Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar;27(2):175-85.
doi: 10.1078/072320204322881790.

Use of the genomic signature in bacterial classification and identification

Tom Coenye  1 , Peter Vandamme
Affiliations

Use of the genomic signature in bacterial classification and identification

Tom Coenye et al. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

In this study we investigated the correlation between dinucleotide relative abundance values (the genomic signature) obtained from bacterial whole-genome sequences and two parameters widely used for bacterial classification, 16S rDNA sequence similarity and DNA-DNA hybridisation values. Twenty-eight completely sequenced bacterial genomes were included in the study. The correlation between the genomic signature and DNA-DNA hybridisation values was high and taxa that showed less than 30% DNA-DNA binding will in general not have dinucleotide relative abundance dissimilarity (delta*) values below 40. On the other hand, taxa showing more than 50% DNA-DNA binding will not have delta* values higher than 17. Our data indicate that the overall correlation between genomic signature and 16S rDNA sequence similarity is low, except for closely related organisms (16S rDNA similarity >94%). Statistical analysis of delta* values between different subgroups of the Proteobacteria indicate that the beta- and gamma-Proteobacteria are more closely related to each other than to the other subgroups of the Proteobacteria and that the alpha- and epsilon-Proteobacteria form clearly separate subgroups. Using the genomic signature we have also predicted DNA-DNA binding values for fastidious or unculturable endosymbionts belonging to the genera Rickettsia, Wigglesworthia and Buchnera.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources