Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening
- PMID: 12743135
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068
Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening
Abstract
One of the most promising approaches to management of ovarian cancer is early detection. Stage I ovarian cancer can be cured with currently available therapy in more than 90% of patients. However, fewer than 25% of ovarian cancers are currently detected in stage I. Detection of a greater fraction of cancers at an early stage might improve clinical outcome. Given a prevalence of one patient with ovarian cancer among 2,500 asymptomatic postmenopausal women in the general population, a successful screening strategy must have a sensitivity of more than 75% and a specificity of more than 99.6% to achieve a positive predictive value of 10%. Approaches to screening include transvaginal sonography, serum markers, and two-stage strategies that use alterations in serum markers to prompt sonographic examination. Among the serum markers, CA-125 has been studied most extensively. Isolated values of CA-125 lack adequate sensitivity or specificity, but when monitored over time, serial CA-125 values can achieve a specificity of 99.6%. However, sensitivity is limited and CA-125 may only be expressed by 80% of early-stage cancers. Multiple markers may exhibit greater specificity when studied over time. To combine multiple markers, more sophisticated mathematical analysis will be required. At present, screening women at conventional risk should be restricted to clinical trials. In the future, however, screening for ovarian cancer may reduce the morbidity and mortality of this disease.
Similar articles
-
Early detection of ovarian cancer: new technologies in pursuit of a disease that is neither common nor rare.Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2004;115:233-47; discussion 247-8. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2004. PMID: 17060970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 Nov-Dec;15 Suppl 3:274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00441.x. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005. PMID: 16343244 Review.
-
Update on ovarian cancer screening.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;19(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328011ec99. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17218847 Review.
-
Results from an ultrasound-based familial ovarian cancer screening clinic: a 10-year observational study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;21(4):378-85. doi: 10.1002/uog.65. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12704748
-
Ovarian cancer screening. The use of serial complementary tumor markers to improve sensitivity and specificity for early detection.Cancer. 1995 Nov 15;76(10 Suppl):2092-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951115)76:10+<2092::aid-cncr2820761331>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1995. PMID: 8635006 Review.
Cited by
-
Early detection of ovarian cancer.Biomark Med. 2008 Jun;2(3):291-303. doi: 10.2217/17520363.2.3.291. Biomark Med. 2008. PMID: 20477415 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of candidate serologic markers for type I and type II ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.039. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Gynecol Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21704359 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a multi-marker model combining HE4, CA125, progesterone, and estradiol for distinguishing benign from malignant pelvic masses in postmenopausal women.Tumour Biol. 2016 Feb;37(2):2183-91. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4037-3. Epub 2015 Sep 9. Tumour Biol. 2016. PMID: 26349751
-
Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.Future Oncol. 2012 Jan;8(1):55-71. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.135. Future Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22149035 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The growing teratoma syndrome.Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Mar;34(3):259-62. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1045-z. Epub 2003 Oct 10. Pediatr Radiol. 2004. PMID: 14551755
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous