Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- PMID: 12698123
Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective comparison of three different types of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Objective: To determine the efficacy of bone marrow and demineralized bone matrix as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusion.
Summary of background data: Several reports have documented a high morbidity associated with harvesting autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for spinal fusion. Composite bone graft consisting of demineralized bone matrix and aspirated bone marrow may reduce the morbidity and still retain the osteoinductive properties of iliac crest autograft.
Methods: Three different bone grafting techniques were used by a single surgeon in 88 consecutive patients who had posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Segmental instrumentation with dual-rod fixation was used in all cases. Selection of type of graft was determined historically by the time when the operations were performed. Autologous ICBG was used in Group A, freeze-dried corticocancellous allograft in Group B, and composite graft of autologous bone marrow and demineralized bone matrix in Group C. Seventy-seven patients were reviewed, with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up (mean, 3 years 7 months; range, 2 years-9 years 5 months). Radiographs were assessed for pseudarthrosis and loss of correction of 10 degrees or more. Loss of 10 degrees of correction has been previously identified as an indicator of potential pseudarthrosis or fusion instability. Both of these criteria were used to compare success of fusion.
Results: Failure caused by pseudarthroses was seen in two patients (2.6%), one in Group A and one in Group B. Eleven patients lost greater than 10 degrees of correction, but only one demonstrated pseudarthroses. The 13 patients with pseudarthroses or loss of correction constitute the failure group for purposes of graft assessment. The failure rate was 12.5% in Group A (ICBG), 28% in Group B (freeze-dried corticocancellous allograft), and 11.1% in Group C (composite graft of autologous bone marrow and demineralized bone matrix). Eliminating patients with crankshaft phenomenon did not substantially change the results. There was no morbidity associated with bone marrow aspiration.
Conclusions: Fusion rates were comparable for GroupA (ICBG) and Group C (composite graft of autologous bone marrow and demineralized bone matrix). The composite graft is our preferred graft for fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Similar articles
-
Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Oct 15;20(20):2211-6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. PMID: 8545714 Clinical Trial.
-
Long adult spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum using rhBMP-2 versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2205-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0485c. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19752707
-
Posterior spinal fusion: allograft versus autograft bone.J Spinal Disord. 1990 Dec;3(4):370-5. J Spinal Disord. 1990. PMID: 2134450
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):772-4; discussion 775. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17414911 Review.
-
Bone grafting options in children.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1648-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce8f4b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20628337 Review.
Cited by
-
Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Mar 13;10:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100112. eCollection 2022 Jun. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022. PMID: 35330662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cell therapy in bone healing disorders.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010 Sep 23;2(2):e20. doi: 10.4081/or.2010.e20. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010. PMID: 21808710 Free PMC article.
-
Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications.SAS J. 2010 Sep 1;4(3):75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004. eCollection 2010. SAS J. 2010. PMID: 25802654 Free PMC article.
-
A level-1 pilot study to evaluate of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate as a graft extender in the posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):170-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0844-1. Epub 2008 Dec 12. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19082847 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.Eur Spine J. 2013 Jun;22(6):1423-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2718-4. Epub 2013 Feb 26. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23440339 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials