Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)
- PMID: 12393746
- DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0772
Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)
Abstract
We analyzed prospectively 1213 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to ascertain the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on complete remission (CR) rate, 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). All patients received similar induction therapy. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 8.3 years. Nonprioritized cytogenetics distinguished t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16) as conferring a significantly better prognosis than normal karyotype. Prognostic impact of many abnormalities could not be determined independently because of their association with complex karyotype. Neither complex karyotype nor secondary aberrations affected outcome of patients with t(8;21), inv(16)/t(16;16), or t(9;11). Among other patients, those with complex karyotypes had significantly worse outcomes than cytogenetically normal patients. Based on outcome for specific cytogenetic abnormalities and karyotype complexity, patients were divided into 3 risk groups: favorable (CR 88%, CIR 54%, OS 55%), intermediate (CR 67%, CIR 67%, OS 24%), and adverse (CR 32%, CIR 92%, OS 5%). Multivariate analyses confirmed the major contribution of cytogenetics to the probability of attaining CR, CIR, and OS. For the adverse-risk group, the probability of achieving CR was 4.0 and 11.9 times lower, the probability of relapse 3.0 and 4.4 times higher, and the risk of death 2.1 and 4.3 times higher than those for the intermediate and favorable groups, respectively. We conclude that although the prognostic impact of many recurring abnormalities has not been ascertained independently of complex karyotype, cytogenetics is among the most useful factors predicting attainment of CR, CIR, and long-term survival in adult AML.
Comment in
-
Description of a novel subtype of acute myeloid leukemia defined by recurrent CBFB insertions.Blood. 2023 Feb 16;141(7):800-805. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017874. Blood. 2023. PMID: 36179268 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The prognostic value of cytogenetics is reinforced by the kind of induction/consolidation therapy in influencing the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia--analysis of 848 patients.Leukemia. 2001 Jun;15(6):903-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402142. Leukemia. 2001. PMID: 11417475 Review.
-
The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial.Blood. 2001 Sep 1;98(5):1312-20. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312. Blood. 2001. PMID: 11520776 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5705-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.15.610. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16110030
-
Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype.Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4173-9. Cancer Res. 1998. PMID: 9751631 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup.Blood. 2003 Jul 15;102(2):462-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3527. Epub 2003 Mar 20. Blood. 2003. PMID: 12649129 Review.
Cited by
-
A comprehensive review of genetic alterations and molecular targeted therapies for the implementation of personalized medicine in acute myeloid leukemia.J Mol Med (Berl). 2020 Aug;98(8):1069-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00109-020-01944-5. Epub 2020 Jul 3. J Mol Med (Berl). 2020. PMID: 32620999 Review.
-
Randomized multicenter phase II study of flavopiridol (alvocidib), cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) versus cytarabine/daunorubicin (7+3) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica. 2015 Sep;100(9):1172-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.125849. Epub 2015 May 28. Haematologica. 2015. PMID: 26022709 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Developmental therapeutics in acute myelogenous leukemia: are there any new effective cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents out there?Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013 Jun;8(2):156-62. doi: 10.1007/s11899-013-0158-1. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013. PMID: 23640069 Review.
-
Targeted Cancer Therapy: Vital Oncogenes and a New Molecular Genetic Paradigm for Cancer Initiation Progression and Treatment.Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Sep 14;17(9):1552. doi: 10.3390/ijms17091552. Int J Mol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27649156 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New strategies in acute myeloid leukemia: redefining prognostic markers to guide therapy.Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5163-71. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0313. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Clin Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22893630 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources