Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health
- PMID: 11744509
- PMCID: PMC1240626
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.109-1240626
Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health
Abstract
Exposures to extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) emanating from the generation, transmission, and use of electricity are a ubiquitous part of modern life. Concern about potential adverse health effects was initially brought to prominence by an epidemiologic report two decades ago from Denver on childhood cancer. We reviewed the now voluminous epidemiologic literature on EMF and risks of chronic disease and conclude the following: a) The quality of epidemiologic studies on this topic has improved over time and several of the recent studies on childhood leukemia and on cancer associated with occupational exposure are close to the limit of what can realistically be achieved in terms of size of study and methodological rigor. b) Exposure assessment is a particular difficulty of EMF epidemiology, in several respects: i) The exposure is imperceptible, ubiquitous, has multiple sources, and can vary greatly over time and short distances. ii) The exposure period of relevance is before the date at which measurements can realistically be obtained and of unknown duration and induction period. iii) The appropriate exposure metric is not known and there are no biological data from which to impute it. c) In the absence of experimental evidence and given the methodological uncertainties in the epidemiologic literature, there is no chronic disease for which an etiological relation to EMF can be regarded as established. d) There has been a large body of high quality data for childhood cancer, and also for adult leukemia and brain tumor in relation to occupational exposure. Among all the outcomes evaluated in epidemiologic studies of EMF, childhood leukemia in relation to postnatal exposures above 0.4 microT is the one for which there is most evidence of an association. The relative risk has been estimated at 2.0 (95% confidence limit: 1.27-3.13) in a large pooled analysis. This is unlikely to be due to chance but, may be, in part, due to bias. This is difficult to interpret in the absence of a known mechanism or reproducible experimental support. In the large pooled analysis only 0.8% of all children were exposed above 0.4 microT. Further studies need to be designed to test specific hypotheses such as aspects of selection bias or exposure. On the basis of epidemiologic findings, evidence shows an association of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with occupational EMF exposure although confounding is a potential explanation. Breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and suicide and depression remain unresolved.
Similar articles
-
Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30 Suppl 1:1-30. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004. PMID: 15255560 Review.
-
Maternal occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields before, during, and after pregnancy in relation to risks of childhood cancers: findings from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers, 1953-1981 deaths.Am J Ind Med. 1999 Apr;35(4):348-57. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199904)35:4<348::aid-ajim5>3.0.co;2-x. Am J Ind Med. 1999. PMID: 10086211
-
Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) and brain cancer in adults and children: review and comment.Neuro Oncol. 1999 Jul;1(3):212-20. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/1.3.212. Neuro Oncol. 1999. PMID: 11550314 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between occupational exposure to power frequency electromagnetic fields and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review.Am J Ind Med. 2003 Feb;43(2):212-20. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10148. Am J Ind Med. 2003. PMID: 12541277 Review.
-
Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies.Risk Anal. 2005 Aug;25(4):927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00635.x. Risk Anal. 2005. PMID: 16268940
Cited by
-
Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation.Environ Health. 2015 Jan 21;14:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-14-7. Environ Health. 2015. PMID: 25604825 Free PMC article.
-
A Genome-Wide mRNA Expression Profile in Caenorhabditis elegans under Prolonged Exposure to 1750MHz Radiofrequency Fields.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 26;11(1):e0147273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147273. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26811916 Free PMC article.
-
Melatonin: does it have utility in the treatment of haematological neoplasms?Br J Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;175(16):3251-3262. doi: 10.1111/bph.13966. Epub 2017 Sep 9. Br J Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 28880375 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of a triaxial fluxgate magnetometer and Toftness sensometer for body surface EMF measurement.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2004 Dec;48(4):273-81. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2004. PMID: 17549105 Free PMC article.
-
Childhood leukemia: electric and magnetic fields as possible risk factors.Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):962-70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6020. Environ Health Perspect. 2003. PMID: 12782499 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical