Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging
- PMID: 11357452
- DOI: 10.1007/s002560000320
Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging
Abstract
Objective: To compare the cartilage thickness, volume, and articular surface areas of the knee joint between young healthy, non-athletic female and male individuals.
Subjects and design: MR imaging was performed in 18 healthy subjects without local or systemic joint disease (9 female, age 22.3 +/- 2.4 years, and 9 male, age 22.2 +/- 1.9 years.), using a fat-suppressed FLASH 3D pulse sequence (TR = 41 ms, TE = 11 ms, FA = 30 degrees) with sagittal orientation and a spatial resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. After three-dimensional reconstruction and triangulation of the knee joint cartilage plates, the cartilage thickness (mean and maximal), volume, and size of the articular surface area were quantified, independent of the original section orientation.
Results and conclusions: Women displayed smaller cartilage volumes than men, the percentage difference ranging from 19.9% in the patella, to 46.6% in the medial tibia. The gender differences of the cartilage thickness were smaller, ranging from 2.0% in the femoral trochlea to 13.3% in the medial tibia for the mean thickness, and from 4.3% in the medial femoral condyle to 18.3% in the medial tibia for the maximal cartilage thickness. The differences between the cartilage surface areas were similar to those of the volumes, with values ranging from 21.0% in the femur to 33.4% in the lateral tibia. Gender differences could be reduced for cartilage volume and surface area when normalized to body weight and body weight x body height. The study demonstrates significant gender differences in cartilage volume and surface area of men and women, which need to be taken into account when retrospectively estimating articular cartilage loss in patients with symptoms of degenerative joint disease. Differences in cartilage volume are primarily due to differences in joint surface areas (epiphyseal bone size), not to differences in cartilage thickness.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative relationships of normal cartilage volumes of the human knee joint--assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998 May;197(5):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s004290050149. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998. PMID: 9623672
-
Interindividual variability and correlation among morphological parameters of knee joint cartilage plates: analysis with three-dimensional MR imaging.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Feb;9(2):101-11. doi: 10.1053/joca.2000.0365. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001. PMID: 11237657
-
[Three-dimensional thickness and volume measurements of the knee joint cartilage by MR tomography: reproducibility in volunteers].Rofo. 1997 Dec;167(6):585-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015587. Rofo. 1997. PMID: 9465953 German.
-
In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging--from image to data, from data to theory.Anat Embryol (Berl). 2001 Mar;203(3):147-73. doi: 10.1007/s004290000154. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2001. PMID: 11303902 Review.
-
Sex differences in the brain are not reduced to differences in body size.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:509-511. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Sep 11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. PMID: 34520800 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative study on the association between types of physical activity, physical activity levels, and the incidence of osteoarthritis in adults: the NHANES 2007-2020.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71766-9. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39232062 Free PMC article.
-
Finite deformation elastography of articular cartilage and biomaterials based on imaging and topology optimization.Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):7980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64723-9. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32409711 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of long-term running on the structure and biochemical composition of knee cartilage in males: a cross-sectional study.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):6036-6047. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1563. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 39144037 Free PMC article.
-
Patients with Small Acetabular Cartilage Defects Caused by Femoroacetabular Impingement Do Not Benefit from Microfracture.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6283. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216283. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36362511 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Knee Articular Cartilage Defect Size Between Measurements Obtained on Preoperative MRI Versus During Arthrotomy.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 6;11(9):23259671231193380. doi: 10.1177/23259671231193380. eCollection 2023 Sep. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37693808 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical