Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Mar;18(3):116-9.

[Evaluation of different clinical samples and cell lines in the isolation of enterovirus in pediatric patients]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10905012

[Evaluation of different clinical samples and cell lines in the isolation of enterovirus in pediatric patients]

[Article in Spanish]
J Reina et al. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy of different clinical samples and cellular lines in the isolation of Enteroviruses from pediatric patients.

Methods: In the period july-1997 to july-1999 we analyze the samples of 102 pediatric patients (< 2 years old) with an unknown febrile etiology syndrome. After the process of decontamination the samples were inoculated in the MRC-5, Hep-2 and Vero cell lines by the shell-vial assay. After 2-3 days of incubation the monolayers were stained by a monoclonal antibody against VP1; then the strains were identified as Poliovirus, ECHO-virus or Coxsacke by specific antibodies.

Results: 96 clinical samples were studied (45 pharyngeal swabs, 28 feces, 13 cerebrospinal fluid, 5 bloods, 4 urines and one bronchoalveolar lavage). Enteroviruses were isolated in 48 patients (47%), corresponding to 60 clinical samples (62.5%). The enteroviruses were isolated in 75.5% of pharyngeal swabs, 71.4% of feces, 30.7% of cerebrospinal fluid, one blood (20%) and the bronchoalveolar lavage. 28 patients presented simultaneously both pharyngeal and rectal swabs; in this group the use of both samples permitted the isolation of Enteroviruses in 26 cases (92.8%). Of 60 Enteroviruses, 59 (98.3%) were isolated in the MRC-5 cell line, 23 (38.3%) in the Hep-2, and 14 (23.3%) in the Vero; the MRC-5 demonstrated a significant difference in the isolation of Enteroviruses compared with the other cell lines. The Enteroviruses were identified as 30 (50%) ECHO-virus, 15 (25%) as Poliovirus vaccine, 12 (20%) could not to be identified and in 3 cases (5%) no growth of virus was detected in the culture. The MRC-5 cell line was significatively superior to the other in the isolation of the different Enteroviruses.

Conclusions: To obtain the maximum diagnostic efficacy in front a patient with a possible infection by Enteroviruses, is necessary to use different clinical samples, specially the more related to the infection focci (cerebrospinal fluid or blood). The MRC-5 cell line has been the most efficace in the isolation of Enteroviruses independently of the type of clinical sample or the viral genus. The shell-vial assay is a good method for the isolation and identification of Enteroviruses isolated from clinical samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles