Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
- PMID: 10871972
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1790
Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
Abstract
Background: Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is an underused cancer prevention procedure. Physicians often cite patient discomfort as a reason for not requesting sigmoidoscopy, but patient experiences and attitudes toward sigmoidoscopy have not been well studied.
Objective: To measure patient satisfaction and the determinants of satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy.
Methods: An instrument to assess satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy was developed. Responses were evaluated with a factor analysis, tested for reproducibility and internal consistency, and validated against an external standard.
Results: A total of 1221 patients (666 men and 555 women; mean age, 61.8 years) were surveyed after sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed by a nurse practitioner (n = 668), internist (n = 344), or gastrointestinal specialist (n= 184). More than 93% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed they would be willing to undergo another examination, and 74.9% would strongly recommend the procedure to their friends. Regarding pain and discomfort, 76.2% strongly agreed or agreed that the examination did not cause a lot of pain, 78.1% stated that it did not cause a lot of discomfort, and 68.5% thought that it was more comfortable than they expected. Fifteen percent to 25% of the patients indicated they had a lot of pain, great discomfort, or more discomfort than expected. Women were more likely to have significant pain or discomfort than men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.3; P<.001).
Conclusions: Approximately 70% of individuals who undergo screening sigmoidoscopy are satisfied and find the procedure more comfortable than expected, whereas only 15% to 25% find the procedure unpleasant. Physicians should not project discomfort onto patients as a reason for not requesting screening sigmoidoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Mar;8(3):120-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599753. J Gen Intern Med. 1993. PMID: 8455106
-
Procedure-related abdominal discomfort in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):3056-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07101.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12492190
-
Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1074-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30215.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15180728 Clinical Trial.
-
Flexible sigmoidoscopy: screening for colorectal cancer.Am Fam Physician. 1999 Mar 15;59(6):1537-46. Am Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10193595 Review.
-
Flexible sigmoidoscopy: screening for colorectal cancer.Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jan 15;59(2):313-24, 327-8. Am Fam Physician. 1999. Corrected and republished in: Am Fam Physician. 1999 Mar 15;59(6):1537-46.. PMID: 9930126 Corrected and republished. Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of the experience of a Cytosponge test: analysis of patient survey data from the BEST3 trial.BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 10;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02630-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 36627580 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial.BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):e054258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35393308 Free PMC article.
-
Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 34706652 Free PMC article.
-
Water immersion sigmoidoscopy versus standard insufflation for colorectal cancer screening: A cohort study.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan-Feb;28(1):39-45. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_198_21. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 34494603 Free PMC article.
-
Satisfaction with high-resolution anoscopy for anal cancer screening among men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional survey in Abuja, Nigeria.BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6567-3. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32024521 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources