Does in situ replacement of a staphylococcal infected vascular graft with a rifampicin impregnated gelatin sealed Dacron graft reduce the incidence of subsequent infection?
- PMID: 10688422
Does in situ replacement of a staphylococcal infected vascular graft with a rifampicin impregnated gelatin sealed Dacron graft reduce the incidence of subsequent infection?
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or S. epidermidis prosthetic vascular graft infections by in situ replacement with a rifampicin bonded Gelsoft graft.
Methods: Interposition grafts were placed in the internal carotid artery of 56 merino sheep and the graft surface directly inoculated with 10(8) colony forming units (CFU) of MRSA (29) or S. epidermidis (27). At three weeks, grafts were harvested and sheep allocated to three groups. In the MRSA infected group, sheep received grafts soaked in 1.2 mg/ml (12), 10 mg/ml (10) and no (7) rifampicin. For S. epidermidis, sheep received grafts soaked in 1.2 mg/ml (10), 10 mg/ml (9) and no (8) rifampicin. There were two deaths, in the MRSA study group, one each from the rifampicin treated groups. The remaining sheep were euthanased and grafts harvested three weeks following regrafting. Grafts at harvests were assessed for perigraft abscess formation, anastomotic disruption and graft thrombosis. Swabs were taken to assess bacterial growth in the perigraft tissues, and external and internal graft surfaces. A 3-5 mm segment of graft was incubated in a broth medium. For S. epidermidis the remainder of the graft was ground and then incubated in a broth medium.
Results: For MRSA, no statistical difference between the groups was reached for any of the measured parameters. For S. epidermidis, a significant reduction was reached for total infected specimens in the 10 mg/ml group compared to both control (p<0.001) and 1.2 mg/ml (p<0.005) groups. Graft reinfection was also less likely to occur with S. epidermidis than MRSA.
Conclusions: In conclusion, replacement of S. epidermidis infected vascular grafts with 10 mg/ml rifampicin soaked Gelsoft graft is effective in reducing subsequent S. epidermidis infection. This conclusion cannot be extended to MRSA infected vascular grafts.
Similar articles
-
Does in situ replacement of a staphylococcal infected vascular graft with a rifampicin impregnated gelatin sealed Dacron graft reduce the incidence of subsequent infection?Int Angiol. 2000 Jun;19(2):158-65. Int Angiol. 2000. PMID: 10905800
-
Efficacy of collagen silver-coated polyester and rifampin-soaked vascular grafts to resist infection from MRSA and Escherichia coli in a dog model.Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;22(6):815-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18835516
-
An increased concentration of rifampicin bonded to gelatin-sealed Dacron reduces the incidence of subsequent graft infections following a staphylococcal challenge.Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Jun;6(3):268-73. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00003-9. Cardiovasc Surg. 1998. PMID: 9705099
-
Antibiotic-impregnated grafts for aortic reconstruction.Semin Vasc Surg. 2011 Dec;24(4):211-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.10.015. Semin Vasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 22230676 Review.
-
Antibiotics-why so many and when should we use them?Semin Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;15(4):268-74. doi: 10.1053/svas.2002.36262. Semin Vasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 12478501 Review.
Cited by
-
Primary infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: surgical procedures, early mortality rates, and a survey of the prevalence of infectious organisms over a 30-year period.Surg Today. 2011 Mar;41(3):346-51. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4279-z. Epub 2011 Mar 2. Surg Today. 2011. PMID: 21365414
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical