Feasibility of a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay for self-testing of travellers' malaria
- PMID: 10444320
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00419.x
Feasibility of a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay for self-testing of travellers' malaria
Abstract
This open comparative study sought to determine whether, and with what level of instruction, travellers can successfully use and interpret the rapid whole blood malaria diagnostic test, ParaSight F. 160 visitors to the Zürich University Travel Clinic took part in the study. One group received written instructions only, while another group was given combined oral and written instructions on how to test their own blood for malaria infection and interpret a series of 5 prepared test strips. Each volunteer also completed a questionnaire targeted at assessing performance in using the diagnostic, interpretation of the results and acceptability of the concept of self-testing for malaria infection. The main outcome measures were successful performance of the test, correct interpretation of prepared test strips and acceptability of the test. In the group which received only written instructions, 60/80 (75%) were successful, whilst in the group which received written and oral instructions, 72/80 (90%) successfully performed the test (P < 0.02). Overall, 565 (70.6%) test strips were correctly and 165 (20.6%) incorrectly interpreted with 113 (14.1%) false negative interpretations. No prepared test strip was interpreted as false positive. Seventy (8.8%) test strips were not interpreted. Some 91. 9% of all candidates would use such a test if it were available. While it is possible for lay persons to successfully perform the test, interpretation of results poses a problem. In particular, the proportion of false negative interpretations is unacceptable. A combination of written and oral instructions leads to a significantly higher level of successful test performance. If such a test is to be made available to the general public, written instructions must be made concise and foolproof and the test endpoint clearly defined, as the currently available test is more suitable for trained laboratory personnel. In the meantime other candidate diagnostics have become available and these should now be assessed for their suitability in the context of travellers' malaria.
Similar articles
-
MalaQuick versus ParaSight F as a diagnostic aid in travellers' malaria.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 May-Jun;93(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90018-4. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999. PMID: 10492756
-
Comparison of the ParaSight-F test and the ICT Malaria Pf test with the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travellers.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Mar-Apr;92(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(98)90730-1. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998. PMID: 9764322
-
Use of the Parasight-F diagnostic test for imported malaria in a travel clinic.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 Jul-Aug;63(1-2):76-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2000.63.76. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000. PMID: 11358000
-
[Malaria--rapid diagnostic tests and emergency self-medication].Ther Umsch. 2001 Jun;58(6):352-61. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.58.6.352. Ther Umsch. 2001. PMID: 11441695 Review. German.
-
Systematic review of the accuracy of the ParaSight-F test in the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria.Med Sci Monit. 2004 Jul;10(7):MT81-8. Epub 2004 Jun 29. Med Sci Monit. 2004. PMID: 15232515 Review.
Cited by
-
False Positive for Malaria Rapid Test in a Patient With Cytomegalovirus Infection.Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63896. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63896. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39104966 Free PMC article.
-
Adequacy of Serial Self-performed SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Testing for Longitudinal Mass Screening in the Workplace.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210559. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10559. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35522284 Free PMC article.
-
Self-diagnosis of malaria by travellers: a cohort study on the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests provided by a Swiss travel clinic.Malar J. 2017 Oct 28;16(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2079-2. Malar J. 2017. PMID: 29080559 Free PMC article.
-
Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09704-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37386558 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the prozone effect in malaria rapid diagnostic tests.Malar J. 2009 Nov 30;8:271. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-271. Malar J. 2009. PMID: 19948018 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical