Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep;73(9):7515-23.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.9.7515-7523.1999.

Envelope-dependent restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spreading in CD4(+) T lymphocytes: R5 but not X4 viruses replicate in the absence of T-cell receptor restimulation

Affiliations

Envelope-dependent restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spreading in CD4(+) T lymphocytes: R5 but not X4 viruses replicate in the absence of T-cell receptor restimulation

E Vicenzi et al. J Virol. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replicates in activated CD4(+) T lymphocytes. However, only CD4(+) Th2 and Th0, but not Th1, CD4(+) T-cell clones have been reported to efficiently support HIV-1 replication. This dichotomous pattern was further investigated in the present study in Th1, Th2, or Th0 cell lines derived from umbilical human cord blood and in T-cell clones obtained from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy adults. Both primary and laboratory-adapted HIV-1 strains with CCR5 as the exclusive entry coreceptor (R5 viruses) efficiently replicated in Th1, Th2, and Th0 cells. In sharp contrast, CXCR4-dependent (X4) viruses poorly replicated in both polarized and unpolarized CD4(+) T cells, including adults' PBMC infected several days after mitogenic stimulation. Unlike the X4 HIV-1(NL4-3), a chimera in which the env gene had been replaced with that of the R5 HIV-1(NL(AD8)), efficiently replicated in both Th1 and Th2 cells. This X4-dependent restriction of HIV replication was not explained by either the absence of functional CXCR4 on the cell surface or by the inefficient viral entry and reverse transcription. T-cell receptor stimulation by anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies fully rescued X4 HIV-1 replication in both Th1 and Th2 cells, whereas it did not alter the extent and kinetics of R5 HIV-1 spreading. Thus, R5 HIVs show a replicative advantage in comparison to X4 viruses in their ability to efficiently propagate among suboptimally activated T lymphocytes, regardless of their polarized or unpolarized functional profiles. This observation may help to explain the absolute predominance of R5 HIVs over X4 viruses observed after viral transmission and during early-stage disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
R5 but not X4 laboratory-adapted HIV-1 strains replicate in Th1 and Th2 CB lines and T-cell clones. All cells were infected with equal amounts of RT activities of laboratory-adapted BaL (R5) (●) and LAI/IIIB (X4) (○). Ten independent experiments were performed, with similar results.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
R5 but not X4 primary HIV-1 isolates replicate in Th1 and Th2 CB lines and T-cell clones. HIV isolates were obtained from infected individuals and characterized for MT-2 cell tropism and chemokine receptor usage, avoiding further in vitro passages. This experiment is representative of four independently performed. ●, BER (R5); ○, BON (X4).
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
R5 but not X4 HIVs replicate in unpolarized T cells. (A) Three independent cell clones from a single donor were infected by equal amounts of virus. Solid symbols, BAL (R5); open symbols, LAI/IIIB (X4). (B) CB cells were stimulated by PHA and IL-2 without Th1 or Th2 polarizing stimuli and maintained in IL-2-enriched medium. When restimulated with PMA and ionomycin, these cells coexpressed both IFN-γ and IL-4. These cells were infected with the laboratory-adapted strains LAI/IIIB (○) and BaL (●) and with the primary X4 BON virus (□).
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Long-term culture of PHA-activated PBMC (PHA blasts) results in loss of X4 virus replication and persistent R5 production. PBMC were freshly isolated from an individual and stimulated with PHA. At 3 days after stimulation, cells were washed and resuspended in an IL-2-enriched medium. Cells were immediately infected with either LAI/IIIB or BaL or were left uninfected in culture for an additional 4 or 8 days, respectively, at which time points they were infected with the same MOI of both viruses.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
A virus chimeric for R5 Env acquires the ability to efficiently replicate in Th1 or Th2 cells. Th1 and Th2 CB lines were infected with comparable amounts of NL4-3 (X4) (Th1 [○] and Th2 [□] or its chimera NL(AD8) (Th1 [●] and Th2 [▴]). Five independent experiments provided similar results.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6
Expression of functional CXCR4 molecules on Th1 and Th2 CB lines. (A) Comparable expressions of CXCR4 and IL-8, but lack of SDF-1 expression, were observed in CB lines of Th1 or Th2 phenotype. (B) Chemotaxis of Th1 and Th2 cells to exogenous SDF-1. Both types of cells show a comparable concentration-dependent response to the chemokine.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7
Lack of X4 HIV spreading among Th1 and Th2 CB lines. Comparable levels of HIV DNA from X4 and R5 HIV are retrotranscribed in both cell types up to 72 h postinfection, after which only R5 viruses efficiently propagated in the cell cultures.
FIG. 8
FIG. 8
Anti-CD3 MAb reactivation of X4 virus replication. CB lines were infected and were either left unstimulated (○) or were stimulated with mitogenic concentrations of anti-CD3 mAb (●). No substantial effects were observed upon infection by R5 viruses, whereas a potent upregulation of viral replication occurred in X4-infected cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adachi A, Gendelman H E, Koenig S, Folks T, Willey R, Rabson A, Martin M A. Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone. J Virol. 1986;59:284–291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiuti A, Turchetto L, Cota M, Cipponi A, Brambilla A, Arcelloni C, Paroni R, Vicenzi E, Bordignon C, Poli G. Human CD34+ cells express CXCR4 and its ligand stromal cell derived factor-1. Implications for infection by T-cell tropic human immunodeficiency virus. Blood. 1999;94:62–73. - PubMed
    1. Aiuti A, Webb I J, Bleul C, Springer T, Gutierrez-Ramos J C. The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood. J Exp Med. 1997;185:111–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger E A, Doms R W, Fenyo E M, Korber B T, Littman D R, Moore J P, Sattentau Q J, Schuitemaker H, Sodroski J, Weiss R A. A new classification for HIV-1. Nature. 1998;391:240. - PubMed
    1. Biswas P, Mengozzi M, Mantelli B, Delfanti F, Brambilla A, Vicenzi E, Poli G. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 upregulates functional CXCR4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coreceptors in U937 minus clones: NF-κB-independent enhancement of viral replication. J Virol. 1998;72:8380–8383. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms