Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jun;73(6):4575-81.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.6.4575-4581.1999.

The role of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-infected dendritic cells in the development of HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis

Affiliations

The role of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-infected dendritic cells in the development of HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis

M Makino et al. J Virol. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

The development of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is closely associated with the activation of T cells which are HTLV-1 specific but may cross-react with neural antigens (Ags). Immature dendritic cells (DCs), differentiated from normal donor monocytes by using recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and recombinant interleukin-4, were pulsed with HTLV-1 in vitro. The pulsed DCs contained HTLV-1 proviral DNA and expressed HTLV-1 Gag Ag on their surface 6 days after infection. The DCs matured by lipopolysaccharides stimulated autologous CD4(+) T cells and CD8(+) T cells in a viral dose-dependent manner. However, the proliferation level of CD4(+) T cells was five- to sixfold higher than that of CD8(+) T cells. In contrast to virus-infected DCs, DCs pulsed with heat-inactivated virions activated only CD4(+) T cells. To clarify the role of DCs in HAM/TSP development, monocytes from patients were cultured for 4 days in the presence of the cytokines. The expression of CD86 Ag on DCs was higher and that of CD1a Ag was more down-regulated than in DCs generated from normal monocytes. DCs from two of five patients expressed HTLV-1 Gag Ag. Furthermore, both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells from the patients were greatly stimulated by contact with autologous DCs pulsed with inactivated viral Ag as well as HTLV-1-infected DCs. These results suggest that DCs are susceptible to HTLV-1 infection and that their cognate interaction with T cells may contribute to the development of HAM/TSP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
(a) Detection of HTLV-1 proviral DNA by nested PCR. Immature DCs were exposed to live HTLV-1 virions for 6 days in vitro. A genomic DNA was extracted from mock- or HTLV-1-infected DCs and amplified by PCR. Lane 1, mock-infected DCs; lanes 2 and 3, HTLV-1-infected DCs. (b) Expression of HTLV-1 Ags on virus-infected DCs. Immature DCs were pulsed with live HTLV-1 for 6 days and examined for HTLV-1 Gag and Env Ag expression by FACScan. –––, control MAb; ———, indicated MAb. The number in each panel represents percent positive cells.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Expression of various molecules on DCs pulsed with HTLV-1. Immature DCs were differentiated from normal healthy donor monocytes, pulsed with 20 CCID50 of live HTLV-1 or equivalent dose of heat-inactivated virions, and matured by LPS (10 ng/ml). –––, control MAb; ———, indicated MAb. The number in each panel represents the mean fluorescence intensity.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
(a) Time-dependent T-cell proliferation stimulated by HTLV-1-infected DCs. Mature HTLV-1-infected DCs were generated by exposure of immature DCs to 20 CCID50 of HTLV-1 and cocultured with unseparated T cells (105/well) at a DC:T-cell ratio of 1:20 or 1:40 in triplicate. Mock-infected DCs were used as a negative control. (b) Ag dose-dependent proliferation of T cells. Immature DCs were pulsed with various doses of live HTLV-1, and unseparated or CD4+ T cells (5 × 104/well) were cocultured with HTLV-1- or mock-infected DCs at a DC:T-cell ratio of 1:20 in triplicate.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Inhibitory effect of various MAbs on DC-CD4 interaction. HTLV-1-infected mature DCs and CD4+ T cells (105/well) were cocultured for 6 days in the presence or absence of MAbs (10 μg/ml) at a DC:CD4+ T-cell ratio of 1:20. The proliferation of T cells in the absence of test MAb was 96,514 ± 1,783 cpm (mean ± standard deviation of triplicate assays). A mixture of normal mouse IgG subclasses (IgG1, Ig2a, Ig2b, and Ig3) was used as control antibody. A representative of three independent experiments is shown.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
Comparison of T-cell-stimulating activities of HTLV-1-infected DCs and inactivated virion-pulsed DCs. (a) Immature DCs were either infected with various doses of HTLV-1 or pulsed with an equivalent dose of heat-inactivated virions, subsequently matured by LPS, and cocultured with autologous unseparated, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (105/well) for 5 days at a DC:T-cell ratio of 1:20. (b) LPS-matured DCs were exposed to live or inactivated virus for 4 days and cocultured with various T cells (105/well) for 5 days at a DC:T-cell ratio of 1:20. A representative result of three independent experiments is shown. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6
Expression of various molecules on DCs generated from uninfected donors and HAM/TSP patients. DCs were generated by using rGM-CSF and rIL-4 from peripheral monocytes for 4 days. Monocytes were purified from PBMCs depleted of CD2+ T cells. The number in the panel for HTLV-1 gag staining of HAM/TSP patient DCs represents the percent positive cells. –––, control MAb; ———, indicated MAb.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7
Autologous T-cell proliferation by DCs from HAM/TSP patients. DCs were generated from peripheral monocytes obtained from an uninfected donor and HAM/TSP patients. Plastic-adherent monocytes were obtained from the population of CD2+ T cells depleted in advance by using beads. CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (5 × 104/well) were stimulated with 2.5 × 103 autologous HTLV-1-infected, inactivated Ag-pulsed or unpulsed DCs per well for 5 days in triplicate. Mature DCs from HAM/TSP patient 2 expressed HTLV-1 Ag on the surface without any exposure to HTLV-1 Ag in vitro and those from patient 1 did not.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhardwaj N. Interactions of viruses with dendritic cells: a double-edged sword. J Exp Med. 1997;186:795–799. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhardwaj N, Bender A, Gonzalez N, Bui L K, Garrett M C, Steinman R M. Influenza virus-infected dendritic cells stimulate strong proliferative and cytolytic responses from human CD8+ T cells. J Clin Investig. 1994;94:797–807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron P U, Fredenthal P S, Barker J M, Gezelter S, Inaba K, Steinman R M. Dendritic cells exposed to human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transmit a vigorous cytopathic infection to CD4+ T cells. Science (Washington, DC) 1992;257:383–387. - PubMed
    1. Cameron P U, Pope M, Gezelter S, Steinman R M. Infection and apoptotic cell death of CD4+ T cells during an immune response to HIV-1 pulsed dedritic cells. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1994;10:61–71. - PubMed
    1. Dhib-Jalbut S, Hoffman P M, Yamabe T, Sun D, Xia J, Eisenberg H, Bergey G, Ruscetti F W. Extracellular human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I Tax protein induces cytokine production in adult human microglial cells. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:787–790. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms