Você está mergulhado em um projeto de design gráfico. Como você lida com as expectativas do cliente em relação aos limites de revisão?

Balancing creativity with client demands can be tricky. Here’s a tip: set revision limits upfront and stick to them. If revisions spiral, gently remind them of initial agreements.

When you've created the final design, changes and revisions are only possible to an extent, about that, the design is considered as a new design. To handle this situation for client expectations on revision limits, you can: 1. Set your work boundaries clear and define what constitutes a revision. 2. Communicate transparently about the revision process and costs. 3. Prioritize feedback and offer design guidance. 4. Provide flexible solutions and alternatives. 5. Establish a change order process for additional revisions.

Lorsque vous êtes plongé dans un projet de design graphique, gérer les attentes des clients en matière de limites de révision nécessite une communication claire dès le départ. Il est essentiel de définir dès le début le nombre de révisions incluses dans le contrat, en expliquant les étapes du processus créatif et en précisant les coûts supplémentaires pour toute révision au-delà de la limite convenue. Cela permet de maintenir un équilibre entre répondre aux besoins du client et éviter des révisions incessantes qui pourraient impacter la qualité et les délais du projet.

I find that establishing a well-defined scope of work at the beginning of the project, well before any design has been executed, is essential to managing revisions limits. Indeed, there is a vast gulf separating revisions from rework and from redesign. Revisions can be accounted for and managed to a reasonable degree, and up-front explanations of those allowances with the client's agreement can be referenced when the number of revisions become unreasonable. Rework and redesign are different beasts, necessitating conversations with the client to articulate the difference. A detailed discovery process, a well-written scope of work, and frequent check-ins with the client can all help mitigate revision hell.

Once, while managing a high-stakes design project, I faced issues with excessive revision requests. Initially, the client was allotted three revisions, but they wanted more. I reminded them of the original agreement and explained how additional changes would impact the timeline and cost. To address this, I proposed a phased review process, allowing incremental feedback without overwhelming the project. This approach maintained control over the scope while keeping the client happy. The project was completed on time, and the client valued the structured handling of revisions, highlighting the importance of clear communication and proactive planning.