Abstract
Small promoters capable of driving potent neuron-restricted gene expression are required to support successful brain circuitry and clinical gene therapy studies. However, converting large promoters into functional MiniPromoters, which can be used in vectors with limited capacity, remains challenging. In this study, we describe the generation of a novel version of alphaherpesvirus latency-associated promoter 2 (LAP2), which facilitates precise transgene expression exclusively in the neurons of the mouse brain while minimizing undesired targeting in peripheral tissues. Additionally, we aimed to create a compact neural promoter to facilitate packaging of larger transgenes. Our results revealed that MiniLAP2 (278 bp) drives potent transgene expression in all neurons in the mouse brain, with little to no expression in glial cells. In contrast to the native promoter, MiniLAP2 reduced tropism in the spinal cord and liver. No expression was detected in the kidney or skeletal muscle. In summary, we developed a minimal pan-neuronal promoter that drives specific and robust transgene expression in the mouse brain when delivered intravenously via AAV-PHP.eB vector. The use of this novel MiniPromoter may broaden the range of deliverable therapeutics and improve their safety and efficacy by minimizing the potential for off-target effects.
Subject terms: Cellular neuroscience, Neurological disorders, Genetic engineering, Genetic vectors, Gene regulation
Introduction
The field of translational neuroscience has brought forth innovative technologies with immense potential for the treatment of prevalent neurological disorders causing disability. Among these advancements, recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-based gene therapy has emerged as a highly promising technology [1]. rAAV is extensively employed in both in vitro and in vivo studies for neural circuit mapping because of its exceptional transfection efficiency and ability to maintain the stable expression of transgenes [2]. However, targeting transgene expression in specific tissues and cell types remains challenging [3, 4]. The use of a cell type-specific promoter can result in improved targeting, which may limit the detection of transgenic proteins by antigen-presenting cells and eliminate undesirable immune responses [5]. Regrettably, most neuron-specific promoters exhibit modest levels of transgene expression [6]. As a result, substantial doses of AAV vectors are frequently administered to achieve therapeutic effectiveness. However, this approach can give rise to significant drawbacks, including thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and hepatotoxicity, as an adverse effect [7, 8]. Promoters with constitutive activity, such as human cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer (CMV; 752 bp) [9], calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKIIa; 1,300 bp) [10], CMV enhancer fused to the chicken beta-actin promoter (CAG; 912 bp) [11, 12] and neuron-specific enolase (NSE; 1800 bp) [13], have demonstrated remarkable potency in selectively driving transgene expression in neurons. However, the substantial size of these promoter sequences restricts the use of large therapeutic transgenes or the incorporation of multiple small transgenes. Many strategies have been devised to enhance cell-specific expression and maximize AAV payload capacity. These strategies include the utilization of dual or triple AAV systems to divide large transgenes into multiple segments [14]; design of therapeutic mini-genes [15]; and/or incorporation, or deletion of viral regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) or enhancers [16–18]. Prior studies have highlighted the effectiveness of inserting TFBSs directly upstream of native promoters. This not only amplifies promoter activity but also substantially augments the specificity of transgene targeting [19]. Likewise, enhancers, those DNA regulatory components responsible for conferring cell type-specific gene expression, when paired with a small promoter, enable accurate tagging of distinct brain regions and cell types, transcending various species [20]. Notably, certain enhancers like the mDlx enhancer retain their specificity even when introduced intravenously into mice through dedicated AAV-PHP.eB vectors [21]. Cutting-edge genomic techniques, such as open chromatin analysis, have played a pivotal role in the discovery of new enhancers, thereby expanding available toolkits [22–26]. Nevertheless, ongoing endeavors to identify and validate enhancers, particularly those exhibiting enhanced efficiency after systemic delivery, will further augment the capabilities of AAV-based tools in the realm of neuroscience research.
The swine herpesvirus pathogen pseudorabies virus (PrV) has been extensively used in CNS neuronal network analyses because it can infect all types of neurons [27, 28]. The constitutive PrV alphaherpesvirus latency-associated promoter (LAP) has a cluster of two tandem promoter sequences (LAP1 and LAP2) that drive sustained transcription of latency-associated transcripts (LATs) [29–32]. In our previous studies, we demonstrated that systemic administration of PrV LAPs drives potent neuron-specific transgene expression independent of PrV infection in the brain and spinal cord, with an activity profile of LAP2 > LAP1_2 tandem» LAP1 [33]. Here, we modified LAP2 to restrict transgene expression in the brain, reduce its distribution to peripheral tissues, and maximize the carrying capacity of AAV. The newly engineered 278 bp promoter that drives an mCherry reporter (MiniLAP2-mCherry) was delivered intravenously into adult mice via AAV-PHP.eB vector at a dose of 5 × 1011 genome copies (gc)/mouse. PHP.eB-LAP2-mCherry was similarly injected to facilitate a side-by-side comparison. After four weeks, we examined mCherry expression in the brain, spinal cord, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle of these mice. We found that the PHP.eB-MiniLAP2 vector induced specific and potent transgene expression in neuronal cells of the mouse brain. In contrast, minimal transgene expression was detected in the spinal cord and liver but not in the kidney and skeletal muscles. These findings suggest that fine-tuning promoter-mediated tissue specificity may be accomplished by adjusting promoter design and incorporating selected TFBSs. In addition to improved specificity, the compact nature of this promoter has proven to be particularly advantageous for scAAV vectors. Hence, the truncated version of LAP2 facilitates the packaging of large or multiple small transgenes without compromising expression efficiency, thereby expanding therapeutic options for addressing brain disorders.
Results and discussion
Considering the critical role of the 3’ end region in promoter-mediated gene transcription [34], we postulated that the LAP2 sequence could potentially be minimized by removing specific DNA elements and motifs positioned directly upstream of the TATA box. We used TRANSFAC® and JASPAR software to predict potential TFBSs within the LAP2 sequence. Thus, we introduced a series of 5’ truncations (21, 46, 65, 91, 149, and 172 bp) immediately upstream of the TATA box, depending on the location of critical TFBSs for expression in neurons, resulting in six promoter variants (Fig. 1A). To assess and compare promoter activities, MiniLAP2 variants were used in constructs designed to drive expression of the fluorescent protein mCherry. Both native and truncated promoter plasmids were transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 (293 T) cells, which exhibit properties similar to those of immature neurons [35]. We evaluated the transfection efficiency based on mCherry fluorescence intensity. Significantly elevated levels of mCherry fluorescence were noted in cells transfected with the truncated 383 bp construct (64%), mirroring the expression levels observed in cells transfected with the native LAP2 construct (404 bp) (75%) (Fig. 1B, C, I). In contrast, none of the other five MiniLAP2 constructs exhibited notable mCherry expression in these cells, indicating a substantial reduction in promoter function (<10%) (Fig. 1D–H, I). These findings suggest that promoter sequence elements located between positions 21 and 172 bp relative to the TATA box play a critical role in facilitating efficient transcription.
A comprehensive analysis of the potential TFBSs in this critical area revealed only a single CREB motif. Previous studies of other members of the herpesvirus family, including herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), revealed that CREB motifs located proximal to the TATA box are necessary to support basal neuronal gene expression [36]. Based on the overall architectural similarity between the LAP2 and HSV-1 gene promoters, we designed a minimal LAP2 promoter by removing the first 160 bp immediately upstream of the TATA box while retaining the 12 bp CREB motif (Fig. 2A). Given that attempts to minimize the promoter could potentially compromise specificity and weaken transgene expression, leading to increased susceptibility to gene silencing, we implemented a strategy to address this issue. We inserted a modified CTCF motif directly upstream of the CREB site to use it as an enhancer-blocking insulator (Fig. 2A). This approach was intended to prevent unwanted interactions and maintain promoter integrity, thereby enhancing transgene expression while preserving specificity. CTCFs contribute to a diverse array of regulatory functions, including transcriptional activation and repression, genome instability, RNA splicing, RNA binding, and enhancer/promoter insulation [37]. For instance, Zimmerman et al. [19], demonstrated that the orientation of the CTCF motif and/or the number of accessible zinc-finger binding sites may have an impact on transgene expression. These effects were observed when the CTCF element was inserted upstream or downstream of the CMV or elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1α) promoter. More specifically, the authors discovered that incorporating a modified CTCF motif (34 bp) with an upstream stabilizer sequence, which had the ability to bind eight of the eleven zinc fingers of its CCCTC-binding factor partner, resulted in substantial enhancement of transgene expression compared to the native motif. This improvement was observed when the modified CTCF motif was inserted downstream of the EF1α promoter [19].
To characterize the novel MiniLAP2 promoter (278 bp) and explore its capacity to drive transgene expression in vivo, we used engineered ssAAV-PHP.eB capsids for gene transfer. This capsid can cross the blood-brain barrier and promote efficient biodistribution and transduction in the CNS [33, 38, 39]. Packaged PHP.eB-MiniLAP2-mCherry and PHP.eB-LAP2-mCherry were delivered by unilateral injection of 5 ×1011 gc/mouse into the retro-orbital sinus. The brain, spinal cord, liver, kidney, and quadriceps muscle were collected 30 days post-inoculation to evaluate and compare reporter gene expression (Fig. 2B). A validated anti-mCherry antibody [33] was used to amplify the reporter protein signal. Representative images of sagittal brain sections revealed widespread and strong mCherry expression in both the promoters (Fig. 2C). Moreover, we detected abundant native mCherry signal in the CA2 region and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, as well as in the cortex and cerebellum (Fig. 2D). Confocal microscopy demonstrated that the expression of the transgene driven by PHP.eB-MiniLAP2 was remarkably enriched in various regions of the brain (Fig. 3A–O). Furthermore, when measuring fluorescence intensity (Fig. 3U), there were no statistically significant differences between the two promoters in the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, or cerebellum (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3K–O, P–T). Similarly, no discernible distinctions were observed when quantifying the number of mCherry-positive cells (Fig. 3V). Specifically, our findings revealed that the percentages of mCherry-positive cells identified in the cortex and hippocampus (80–83%, P < 0.002) were significantly higher than those detected in the striatum and cerebellum (64–70%), regardless of the promoter construct used (Fig. 3V). These findings established that both promoters drive analogous transgene expression within the brain following a single systemic AAV administration, even in the presence of a 40% reduction compared to the native sequence.
To determine whether MiniLAP2 drives neuron-specific expression in vivo, we performed co-immunostaining of mCherry protein with neuronal markers (anti-neuronal nuclear protein [NeuN]) and non-neuronal cell types, including astrocytes (anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]), microglia (anti-ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 [Iba1]), and oligodendrocytes (anti-oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 [Olig2]) (Fig. 4). Within the cortex, mCherry was detected in large pyramidal neurons in somatomotor area layers II–III and V (Fig. 4A1, C). Prominent expression was also detected in the hippocampus, specifically in neurons of the granular layer and hilus of the dentate gyrus (Fig. 4B1, C). Conversely, very few mCherry-positive non-neuronal cells were detected, including only 1% and 3% of astrocytes in cortex and hippocampus, respectively. Similarly, only 1% microglia and 1% oligodendrocytes were mCherry-positive in mice inoculated with the MiniPromoter (Fig. 4A2–A, B2–B4, C). These findings indicated that MiniLAP2 drives neuron-specific transgene expression in the brain of mice systemically inoculated with AAV-PHP.eB.
We next evaluated mCherry expression in regions containing specific inhibitory and excitatory neurons and performed immunostaining to determine whether mCherry was preferentially expressed in GABAergic (anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase [GAD67]-positive), glutamatergic (anti-vesicular glutamate transporter 2 [vGlut2]-positive), or dopaminergic (anti-tyrosine hydroxylase [TH]-positive) cells. Representative confocal images revealed that GAD67 was concentrated primarily in the soma of GABAergic neurons, as well as in an overlapping pattern with mCherry in pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region (Fig. 5A). We also detected MiniLAP2-driven transgene expression in glutamatergic neurons in the cerebellum (Fig. 5B) and well as those in the substantia nigra (TH-positive neurons) (Fig. 5C). In addition to the brain, we evaluated PHP.eB-MiniLAP2-mediated transgene expression in the spinal cord (Fig. 5D–H). Negligible transgene expression was observed in the dorsal and ventral horns of the lumbar spinal cord, in which only approximately 4% of mCherry-positive cells were co-immunostained with anti-NeuN (Fig. 5D, E, H). This notable 70% reduction, compared to native LAP2 (Fig. 5F–H), strongly suggests that the design of the MiniLAP2 sequence facilitates selective transgene expression specifically in brain neurons while exhibiting limited expression in the spinal cord.
To evaluate the distribution of AAV-MiniLAP2 in the cellular compartments of brain neurons, we examined the images and performed quantitative analysis of the AAV vector genome (DNA) and transcript (mRNA) in mouse brains 30 days after systemic administration of the vector. For these experiments, we used RNAscope/BaseScope® approaches to detect mCherry mRNA and AAV DNA, respectively. In both the cortex and the hippocampal CA2 region, individual dots representing DNA signals were clearly visible within cell nuclei, with positivity rates of 68% and 75%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1A–B, 1E, 1I). A semi-quantitative assessment of DNA was performed using the Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) scoring criteria (see Materials and Methods). Using this system, the cortex and hippocampus received an ACD score of 3, corresponding to an average of 10–15 viral gc per cell, and <10% of the dots were localized in clusters (Supplementary Fig. 1J). Interestingly, the signal levels denoting the viral transcripts in these regions were more homogeneous. We found that mCherry RNA transcripts were concentrated as foci in all regions of the cortex that were evaluated (Supplementary Fig. 1D, C) and that transcription was much more active in hippocampal CA neurons than in the dentate gyrus (Supplementary Fig. 1D, F). Transgene transcripts were detected in 71% and 85% of cells in the cortex and hippocampus, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1K). Notably, while mRNA was detected in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, we cannot rule out the possibility that nuclear location may result (all or in part) from interactions between the antisense probe and the sense strand of AAV DNA. We determined that both regions exhibited >15 dots per cell, with >10% of the dots found in the clusters (Supplementary Fig. 1L). As expected, increased mCherry levels were discerned following the systemic delivery of PHP.eB-MiniLAP2, affirming the operational efficacy of MiniLAP2.
We then examined the AAV-MiniLAP2 performance in peripheral tissues, utilizing immunohistochemical and morphometric techniques to assess mCherry expression (Fig. 6). Upon systemic administration of PHP.eB-MiniLAP2, we observed absence of transgene expression in the kidney (Fig. 6A3) and negligible expression of mCherry in the liver (Fig. 6B3) which contrasts markedly with the expression levels observed for the native LAP2 promoter (Fig. 6A2, C2). While no expression was observed for both promoters in skeletal muscles like negative control (Fig 6C1-3). mCherry expression in the liver was quantified as the number of positive pixels per square micron detected within the liver lobule. Using this method, we observed significantly lower mCherry immunostaining in liver tissues from mice inoculated with PHP.eB-MiniLAP2 than in mice inoculated with PHP.eB-LAP2, detected at 1% and 11%, respectively (Fig. 6D–F). Notably, previous studies utilizing PET image analysis have revealed that systemic administration of PHP.eB-CAG in C57BL/6 mice leads to substantial transgene expression in peripheral organs [40]. High levels of transduction were specifically observed in the liver and kidney within the initial 4–21 h post administration. Furthermore, a biodistribution analysis demonstrated that the presence of PHP.eB-CAG-mNeonGreen in the liver remained consistently high for up to three weeks following administration [41]. In light of these results, our findings highlight the potential of our MiniLAP2 design when packaged into the PHP.eB capsid. This design demonstrated a substantial reduction in off-target transgene expression in peripheral tissues compared with the native LAP2 promoter following systemic administration in C57BL/6 mice.
In this study, we aimed to achieve targeted transgene expression, specifically in brain neurons, by using a compact promoter sequence delivered via an rAAV vector. Our results revealed several noteworthy and biologically significant findings that hold promise for the development of novel promoters designed to overcome existing challenges. This study demonstrates the potential utility of MiniLAP2 in treating brain-related genetic disorders, as it possesses the advantage of being compatible with AAV vectors because of its compact size, and it leads to robust and sustained transgene expression in brain neurons while reducing off-target effects on peripheral tissues after intravenous administration.
Materials and methods
Construction and production of AAVs
All AAV vectors were produced by the Princeton Neuroscience Institute (PNI) Viral Core Facility (Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University), and contained mCherry driven by MiniLAP2 or LAP2. These vectors also include WPRE (woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element) and human growth hormone polyadenylation (pA) sequence. The AAV plasmid was transfected into 293 T cells using PEI MAX (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) and culture in six-well plates. Three days later, the mCherry-positive fluorescent cells were imaged with a Nikon Ti-E inverted epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The resulting AAV plasmids were selected and packaged into ssAAV-PHP.eB serotype as previously described [33]. The AAV titer was measured by qPCR using TaqMan (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and reported as genome copies (gc) per ml [42, 43].
Animals
Five-week-old wild-type C57BL/6 male mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used for all experiments. The mice were maintained under a 12-hr light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Special care was taken to minimize suffering and to reduce the number of animals used to the minimum required for statistical inference. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Princeton University (protocol 1947-19). Intravenous administration of rAAV vectors was performed via injection into the retro-orbital sinus. In this study, we used a cohort of 12 mice, which were distributed into three groups, each consisting of four mice. Specifically, one group received injections of PHP.eB-LAP2 (100 μl of 5 × 1011 gc), another received PHP.eB-MiniLAP2 (100 μl of 5 × 1011 gc) injections, and the third group served as a negative control and received buffer injections. Negative control mice were injected with 100 μl of buffer (1X PBS, 172 mM NaCl, 0.001% Pluronic F68, and 5% glycerol) without AAV. Animals were euthanized 30 days post-inoculation via intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (400 mg/kg)/xylazine (50 mg/kg), followed by perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Histology
Whole brain and spinal cord tissues were post-fixed for 2 h at room temperature (RT). The liver, kidneys, and quadriceps muscles were post-fixed for 24 h at 4 °C. All tissues were dehydrated in a sucrose gradient as previously described [44]. Paraffin blocks and sections (5 µm thickness) for immunohistochemistry (IHC), frozen blocks followed by sections (10 µm thickness) for and immunofluorescence (IF) and in situ hybridization (ISH) were prepared by HistoWiz, Inc. (Brooklyn, NY, USA).
IHC and IF staining
Tissues to be evaluated by chromogenic IHC detection of mCherry were counterstained with hematoxylin. All staining procedures were performed using a Leica Bond RX Automated Stainer (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) by HistoWiz Inc. IF staining of brain and spinal cord sections was performed as previously described [33]. Briefly, cryosections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT (Supplementary Table 1). Nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and mounted with Vectashield® Vibrance antifade mounting media (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA).
mRNA/DNA ISH
ISH detection of mCherry mRNA was performed using RNAscope® 2.5 High Definition (HD) Red assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics [ACD], Newark, CA, USA). Briefly, brain sections were boiled for 15 min in the target retrieval solution and pretreated with proteinase plus solution for 30 min at 40 °C. Pretreated tissues were incubated with RNAscope® target probes (Supplementary Table 2) for 2 h at 40 °C and counterstained with hematoxylin. To detect mCherry DNA, the protocol was adapted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and included incubation with RNase A (5 mg/ml, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for 30 min at 40 °C immediately before hybridization with the DNAscope® target probe (Supplementary Table 2) via overnight incubation at 40 °C. The tissues were then counterstained with hematoxylin.
Image analysis
Whole-slide scanning (40x) was performed using an Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica Microsystems). Morphometry of the resulting histological images was performed using HALO® software by HistoWiz Inc. Fluorescent images were captured using a Leica SP8-LSCM confocal microscope (20x). Whole brains were imaged using a NanoZoomer S60 microscopic scanner (Hamamatsu, Japan). Image reconstructions of z-stacks and intensity projection images were generated using ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) and quantified using QuPath 0.3.0 software (https://qupath.github.io) [45]. The fluorescence intensity was calculated using an adaptation of the corrected total cell fluorescence formula [46]. Briefly, Cells were selected by drawing a region of interest (ROI) by tracking cells in DAPI expression and normalized to the background intensity from non-fluorescent cells. To RNA/DNA ISH the average number of dots per cell was calculated using the following ACD scoring criteria: 0 (no staining or <1 dot/10 cells), 1 (1–3 dots/cell), 2 (4–9 dots/cell and/or few to no dot clusters), 3 (10–15 dots/cell and/or <10% of the dots in clusters), and 4 (>15 dots/cell and/or >10% of the dots in clusters).
Statistical analysis
No data was excluded from analysis. The allocation of animals and samples to separate groups was randomized. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to evaluate differences between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate differences among multiple groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
I thank Professor Sam Wang from the Department of Molecular Biology and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute (PNI), Princeton University, for kindly sharing consumables and equipment. Angela Chan and Oliver Huang from the Viral Vector Core Facility at PNI, Princeton University, for assistance with cloning and AAV production, Mahdi Kooshkbaghi from Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, for software assistance, and Esteban A. Engel from the Viral Vector Core Facility at PNI, Princeton University, for generous funding support. This work was partially supported by a PNI Research Innovator grant, Princeton IP Accelerator grant, NJ-ACTS UL1TR003017 grant, and NIH grants P40OD010996 and NIH-1U01NS113868. Figure 2B was created using BioRender (https://biorender.com/).
Author contributions
CJM: investigation, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, software, visualization, conceptualization, validation, supervision, project administration, writing the original draft.
Data availability
The data presented in this study are available in “Engineered compact pan-neuronal promoter from Alphaherpesvirus LAP2 enhances target gene expression in the mouse brain and reduces tropism in the liver.” Original findings are available upon request.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41434-023-00430-0.
References
- 1.Tuszynski MH. Translational Neuroscience. New York, NY: Springer; 2016. 584 p.
- 2.Hui Y, Zheng X, Zhang H, Li F, Yu G, Li J, et al. Strategies for Targeting Neural Circuits: How to Manipulate Neurons Using Virus Vehicles. Front Neural Circuits. 2022;16:882366. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.882366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Montano-Samaniego M, Bravo-Estupinan DM, Mendez-Guerrero O, Alarcon-Hernandez E, Ibanez-Hernandez M. Strategies for Targeting Gene Therapy in Cancer Cells With Tumor-Specific Promoters. Front Oncol. 2020;10:605380. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.605380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cring MR, Sheffield VC. Gene therapy and gene correction: targets, progress, and challenges for treating human diseases. Gene Ther. 2022;29:3–12. doi: 10.1038/s41434-020-00197-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haery L, Deverman BE, Matho KS, Cetin A, Woodard K, Cepko C, et al. Adeno-Associated Virus Technologies and Methods for Targeted Neuronal Manipulation. Front Neuroanat. 2019;13:93. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Powell SK, Rivera-Soto R, Gray SJ. Viral expression cassette elements to enhance transgene target specificity and expression in gene therapy. Discov Med. 2015;19:49–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Domenger C, Grimm D. Next-generation AAV vectors-do not judge a virus (only) by its cover. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:R3–R14. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kishimoto TK, Samulski RJ. Addressing high dose AAV toxicity - ‘one and done’ or ‘slower and lower’? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22:1067–71. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2060737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nieuwenhuis B, Haenzi B, Hilton S, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Hobo B, Verhaagen J, et al. Optimization of adeno-associated viral vector-mediated transduction of the corticospinal tract: comparison of four promoters. Gene Ther. 2021;28:56–74. doi: 10.1038/s41434-020-0169-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sohal VS, Zhang F, Yizhar O, Deisseroth K. Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature. 2009;459:698–702. doi: 10.1038/nature07991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hollidge BS, Carroll HB, Qian R, Fuller ML, Giles AR, Mercer AC, et al. Kinetics and durability of transgene expression after intrastriatal injection of AAV9 vectors. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1051559. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1051559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Finneran DJ, Njoku IP, Flores-Pazarin D, Ranabothu MR, Nash KR, Morgan D, et al. Toward Development of Neuron Specific Transduction After Systemic Delivery of Viral Vectors. Front Neurol. 2021;12:685802. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.685802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Delzor A, Dufour N, Petit F, Guillermier M, Houitte D, Auregan G, et al. Restricted transgene expression in the brain with cell-type specific neuronal promoters. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2012;23:242–54. doi: 10.1089/hgtb.2012.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maturana CJ, Verpeut JL, Kooshkbaghi M, Engel EA. Novel tool to quantify with single-cell resolution the number of incoming AAV genomes co-expressed in the mouse nervous system. Gene Ther. 2021;30:463–8. doi: 10.1038/s41434-021-00272-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang Y, Duan D. Novel mini-dystrophin gene dual adeno-associated virus vectors restore neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression at the sarcolemma. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23:98–103. doi: 10.1089/hum.2011.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Leeuw CN, Dyka FM, Boye SL, Laprise S, Zhou M, Chou AY, et al. Targeted CNS Delivery Using Human MiniPromoters and Demonstrated Compatibility with Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2014;1:5. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2013.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Au HKE, Isalan M, Mielcarek M. Gene Therapy Advances: A Meta-Analysis of AAV Usage in Clinical Settings. Front Med. 2021;8:809118. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.809118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wagner HJ, Weber W, Fussenegger M. Synthetic Biology: Emerging Concepts to Design and Advance Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2004018. doi: 10.1002/advs.202004018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zimmerman D, Patel K, Hall M, Elmer J. Enhancement of transgene expression by nuclear transcription factor Y and CCCTC-binding factor. Biotechnol Prog. 2018;34:1581–8. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Challis RC, Ravindra Kumar S, Chen X, Goertsen D, Coughlin GM, Hori AM, et al. Adeno-Associated Virus Toolkit to Target Diverse Brain Cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2022;45:447–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-111020-100834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dimidschstein J, Chen Q, Tremblay R, Rogers SL, Saldi GA, Guo L, et al. A viral strategy for targeting and manipulating interneurons across vertebrate species. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1743–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.4430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Graybuck LT, Daigle TL, Sedeno-Cortes AE, Walker M, Kalmbach B, Lenz GH, et al. Enhancer viruses for combinatorial cell-subclass-specific labeling. Neuron. 2021;109:1449–64.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hrvatin S, Tzeng CP, Nagy MA, Stroud H, Koutsioumpa C, Wilcox OF, et al. A scalable platform for the development of cell-type-specific viral drivers. Elife. 2019;8:1–23. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mich JK, Graybuck LT, Hess EE, Mahoney JT, Kojima Y, Ding Y, et al. Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108754. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nair RR, Blankvoort S, Lagartos MJ, Kentros C. Enhancer-Driven Gene Expression (EDGE) Enables the Generation of Viral Vectors Specific to Neuronal Subtypes. iScience. 2020;23:100888. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vormstein-Schneider D, Lin JD, Pelkey KA, Chittajallu R, Guo B, Arias-Garcia MA, et al. Viral manipulation of functionally distinct interneurons in mice, non-human primates and humans. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1629–36. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0692-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Card JP, Enquist LW. Transneuronal circuit analysis with pseudorabies viruses. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2014;68:151–39. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0105s68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fortino TA, Randelman ML, Hall AA, Singh J, Bloom DC, Engel E, et al. Transneuronal tracing to map connectivity in injured and transplanted spinal networks. Exp Neurol. 2022;351:113990. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cheung AK, Smith TA. Analysis of the latency-associated transcript/UL1-3.5 gene cluster promoter complex of pseudorabies virus. Arch Virol. 1999;144:381–91. doi: 10.1007/s007050050511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jin L, Schnitzlein WM, Scherba G. Identification of the pseudorabies virus promoter required for latency-associated transcript gene expression in the natural host. J Virol. 2000;74:6333–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.14.6333-6338.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Taharaguchi S, Kobayashi T, Yoshino S, Ono E. Analysis of regulatory functions for the region located upstream from the latency-associated transcript (LAT) promoter of pseudorabies virus in cultured cells. Vet Microbiol. 2002;85:197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00513-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Taharaguchi S, Yoshino S, Amagai K, Ono E. The latency-associated transcript promoter of pseudorabies virus directs neuron-specific expression in trigeminal ganglia of transgenic mice. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:2015–22. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.19080-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maturana CJ, Verpeut JL, Pisano TJ, Dhanerawala ZM, Esteves A, Enquist LW, et al. Small Alphaherpesvirus Latency-Associated Promoters Drive Efficient and Long-Term Transgene Expression in the CNS. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020;17:843–57. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sahu B, Hartonen T, Pihlajamaa P, Wei B, Dave K, Zhu F, et al. Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements. Nat Genet. 2022;54:283–94. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-01009-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shaw G, Morse S, Ararat M, Graham FL. Preferential transformation of human neuronal cells by human adenoviruses and the origin of HEK 293 cells. FASEB J. 2002;16:869–71. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0995fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Perng GC, Jones C. Towards an understanding of the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-reactivation cycle. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2010;2010:262415. doi: 10.1155/2010/262415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Braccioli L, de Wit E. CTCF: a Swiss-army knife for genome organization and transcription regulation. Essays Biochem. 2019;63:157–65. doi: 10.1042/EBC20180069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mathiesen SN, Lock JL, Schoderboeck L, Abraham WC, Hughes SM. CNS Transduction Benefits of AAV-PHP.eB over AAV9 Are Dependent on Administration Route and Mouse Strain. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020;19:447–58. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chan KY, Jang MJ, Yoo BB, Greenbaum A, Ravi N, Wu WL, et al. Engineered AAVs for efficient noninvasive gene delivery to the central and peripheral nervous systems. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1172–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seo JW, Ingham ES, Mahakian L, Tumbale S, Wu B, Aghevlian S, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging of novel AAV capsids maps rapid brain accumulation. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15818-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Seo JW, Ajenjo J, Wu B, Robinson E, Raie MN, Wang J, et al. Multimodal imaging of capsid and cargo reveals differential brain targeting and liver detargeting of systemically-administered AAVs. Biomaterials. 2022;288:121701. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chan A, Maturana CJ, Engel EA. Optimized formulation buffer preserves Adeno-associated virus-9 infectivity after 4 degrees C storage and freeze/thawing cycling. J Virol Methods. 2022;309:114598. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Maturana CJ, Verpeut JL, Engel EA. Single-Cell Quantification of Triple-AAV Vector Genomes Coexpressed in Neurons. Curr Protoc. 2022;2:e430. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Laval K, Maturana CJ, Enquist LW. Mouse Footpad Inoculation Model to Study Viral-Induced Neuroinflammatory Responses. J Vis Exp. 2020. 10.3791/61121. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Maturana CJ, Chan A, Verpeut JL, Engel EA. Local and systemic administration of AAV vectors with alphaherpesvirus latency-associated promoter 2 drives potent transgene expression in mouse liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle. J Virol Methods. 2023;314:114688. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Maturana CJ, Aguirre A, Saez JC. High glucocorticoid levels during gestation activate the inflammasome in hippocampal oligodendrocytes of the offspring. Dev Neurobiol. 2017;77:625–42. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in “Engineered compact pan-neuronal promoter from Alphaherpesvirus LAP2 enhances target gene expression in the mouse brain and reduces tropism in the liver.” Original findings are available upon request.