Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0268592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268592

Post-translational modifications glycosylation and phosphorylation of the major hepatic plasma protein fetuin-A are associated with CNS inflammation in children

Frederik Ricken 1,2, Ahu Damla Can 1,2, Steffen Gräber 2, Martin Häusler 1,#, Willi Jahnen-Dechent 2,*,#
Editor: Pavel Strnad3
PMCID: PMC9544022  PMID: 36206263

Abstract

Fetuin-A is a liver derived plasma protein showing highest serum concentrations in utero, preterm infants, and neonates. Fetuin-A is also present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The origin of CSF fetuin-A, blood-derived via the blood-CSF barrier or synthesized intrathecally, is presently unclear. Fetuin-A prevents ectopic calcification by stabilizing calcium and phosphate as colloidal calciprotein particles mediating their transport and clearance. Thus, fetuin-A plays a suppressive role in inflammation. Fetuin-A is a negative acute-phase protein under investigation as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS). Here we studied the association of pediatric inflammatory CNS diseases with fetuin-A glycosylation and phosphorylation. Paired blood and CSF samples from 66 children were included in the study. Concentration measurements were performed using a commercial human fetuin-A/AHSG ELISA. Of 60 pairs, 23 pairs were analyzed by SDS-PAGE following glycosidase digestion with PNGase-F and Sialidase-AU. Phosphorylation was analyzed in 43 pairs by Phos-TagTM acrylamide electrophoresis following alkaline phosphatase digestion. Mean serum and CSF fetuin-A levels were 0.30 ± 0.06 mg/ml and 0.644 ± 0.55 μg/ml, respectively. This study showed that serum fetuin-A levels decreased in inflammation corroborating its role as a negative acute-phase protein. Blood-CSF barrier disruption was associated with elevated fetuin-A in CSF. A strong positive correlation was found between the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient and the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient, suggesting predominantly transport across the blood-CSF barrier rather than intrathecal fetuin-A synthesis. Sialidase digestion showed increased asialofetuin-A levels in serum and CSF samples from children with neuroinflammatory diseases. Desialylation enhanced hepatic fetuin-A clearance via the asialoglycoprotein receptor thus rapidly reducing serum levels during inflammation. Phosphorylation of fetuin-A was more abundant in serum samples than in CSF, suggesting that phosphorylation may regulate fetuin-A influx into the CNS. These results may help establish Fetuin-A as a potential biomarker for neuroinflammatory diseases.

Introduction

Fetuin-A (alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein, genetic symbols AHSG/FETUA) is a 60 kDa glycoprotein which is predominantly synthesized in liver cells, abundant in serum [1], attains highest serum concentrations in utero and in preterm children and reaches normal serum levels soon after birth [2]. Synthesis is repressed during acute phase by proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta or IL-6, but is induced by high blood glucose and glucocorticoid levels as well as growth factors and insulin [35]. The cystatin-like amino-terminal protein folding domain CY1 mediates high affinity binding of fetuin-A to apatite in bone and teeth [6]. Fetuin-A is modified post-translationally in several ways. It is processed by limited proteolysis and carries up to six serine and one threonine FAM20C phosphorylation sites [79]. Sequence prediction and experimental work according to Uniprot entry P02765 list altogether two N-linked and six O-linked glycosylation sites [10].

Glycosylation is important for cell-protein interaction, regulating protein internalization, protein degradation, regulation of cell growth, differentiation and death [11, 12]. Glycans are involved in leucocyte-trafficking, i.e. adhesion of immune cells to endothelial cells [13]. Impaired glycosylation may lead to organ malformation and dysfunction and enhance tumor cell survival [11]. Fetuin-A has altogether eight putative glycosylation sites with terminal sialic acid. Of these, six O-glycans were shown to comprise core 1 or core 8 glycans, containing N-acetylgalactosamine, galactose and terminal sialic acids attached to T270, S280, S293, T339, T341 and S346, according to Uniprot [10, 14]. Two complex N-glycans containing N-acetylglucosamine, hexose and terminal sialic acids are attached to N156 and N176, respectively [10, 14].

Sialic acid monosaccharides decorate both O- and N-glycans. Posttranslational acetylation or hydroxylation further increase variability. Sialic acids are cleaved by sialidases located on the cell surface, in the cytoplasm and in microorganisms [15]. Increased sialidase activity was observed in septicemia [16]. Sialic acids may stabilize molecules and membranes, interact with cells and the extracellular matrix, protect proteins and glycan-bound monosaccharides from proteases, glycosidases and from oxidative stress. Sialic acids induce immune tolerance, inhibit immune cells and regulate immune cell migration [15, 17]. The terminally bound sialic acids are of particular importance for fetuin-A metabolism as they protect circulating fetuin-A from hepatic clearance through the asialoglycoprotein receptor, which is expressed on hepatocytes and liver macrophages [18, 19]. Attenuated fetuin-A sialylation has been observed in autoimmune diseases [17], in neonates with intrauterine growth retardation [20] and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [21], whereas increased sialylated fetuin-A serum levels were recorded in patients with allergies [22].

Most studies on fetuin-A glycosylation indicate a major role of fetuin-A sialylation for immune regulation. This includes counter regulation of the innate immune response in a rat model of carrageenan injection [23], augmentation of the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by human peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages [24], promotion of Th2 immune response in mice [22], a neuroprotective effect in a rat model of cerebral stroke [25] and a protective effect on survival in an endotoxin-model of septicemia in mice [26]. Sialylated fetuin-A is thought to be a carrier of spermine, which inhibits secretion of proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages and monocytes [27].

Protein phosphorylation regulates enzyme and receptor activity modulating metabolic activity and protein-protein interactions with downstream signaling [2830]. Several phosphorylated proteins have been discussed as biomarkers for neurological diseases, including transferrin [31], alpha synuclein [32] or phosphorylated neurofilament H [33], but only phosphorylated tau has so far been established as a biomarker of neurodegenerative disorders [34].

Fetuin-A plays an important role in mineralized matrix metabolism [35]. Fetuin-A inhibits precipitation of calcium phosphate from supersaturated salt solutions [36]. Phosphorylated fetuin-A was shown to preferentially bind calcium phosphate [37] forming complexes similar or identical to calciprotein particles (CPP), which we and others showed to stabilize calcium and phosphate thus preventing mineral precipitation and ectopic calcification [35, 3840]. Fetuin-A acts as an inhibitor of dystrophic calcification together with other extracellular regulators of mineralization including magnesium and pyrophosphate [41]. Fetuin-A phosphorylation was also claimed critical for inhibiting insulin receptor binding and signaling [42], a role soon debated [43, 44] and not convincingly confirmed thereafter. The role of phosphofetuin-A in cerebrospinal fluid has never been studied.

In brain tissue strong fetuin-A staining has been reported for prenatal age suggesting its presence throughout brain development [45]. An intrathecal synthesis of fetuin-A in the choroid plexus was described in rats [46]. Although the amount of cerebral fetuin-A staining rapidly decreases after birth, fetuin-A presence was confirmed in pathological conditions including multiple sclerosis, ischemia and infections [47].

Altered protein composition of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is of diagnostic value in various neurological diseases. In this context, basic diagnostic tools are assessment of the blood-CSF barrier and of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis as modelled by Reiber et al. [48]. Accordingly, proteins gain access to the CSF either by passive entry from intravascular fluid (80%), or else are synthesized intrathecally, particularly by the choroid plexus (20%). This results in a concentration gradient with higher protein concentrations in ventricular than in lumbar CSF [49]. The concentration of plasma-derived proteins in CSF depends on their concentration in serum, the concentration gradient between plasma and CSF and the flow rate of the CSF [50]. Slowing of the CSF flow rate in inflammatory processes leads to an increase of the CSF protein concentration [51]. Similarly, reduced CSF flow rates in the elderly and in neonates may contribute to their higher CSF protein concentrations [50]. Hereby the blood-CSF barrier is considered a functional barrier. Disturbed blood-CSF barrier function with high CSF protein concentrations and increased CSF/serum protein quotients may also be based on a slow CSF flow rate. Calculation of the age-dependent CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient (QAlb) is used for clinical assessment of the blood-CSF barrier function. Accordingly, pathological intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis is diagnosed based on CSF and serum quotients for antibodies (QIg) and albumin (QAlb) [49, 50].

In addition to blood-CSF barrier function and intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis various CSF proteins have been screened in order to establish biomarkers that may help diagnose certain neurological diseases or monitor their activity [52]. As for multiple sclerosis these candidate biomarkers include transcription factors, neurofilaments, receptors, microRNA, antibodies to viruses and also fetuin-A [52, 53]. Fetuin-A levels in CSF correlated with disease activity [54] and fetuin-A knock-out mice were protected from experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) [55]. In line with its role as a negative acute phase protein, fetuin-A serum levels were reported to decline with inflammatory activity [56]. Cognitive decline in the elderly was associated with both low fetuin-A serum and CSF concentrations [57, 58].

The aim of this study was to gain knowledge on the physiology of posttranslational fetuin-A modifications, i.e. of glycosylation and phosphorylation, in the CSF compartment as this might help to assess its suitability as a biomarker for inflammatory CNS disease. We determined amount, glycosylation, and phosphorylation of fetuin-A in blood and CSF of probands with and without cerebral inflammatory disease.

Methods

Probands

Paired Blood and CSF samples had been obtained from 66 children treated at the Childrens´ hospital of RWTH Aachen University Hospital during venous and lumbar punctures performed for routine clinical analysis. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen University (EK 139/07). Written parental consent (and patient consent so far applicable) was available for all probands. Long-term storage of the samples was done at -80° Celsius.

Clinical data collected included basic clinical diagnoses, age at investigation, serum C-reactive protein concentrations, CSF/serum quotients for IgG and albumin, CSF cells and protein levels and blood count. The laboratory tests were performed as part of routine clinical testing by the central laboratory of the RWTH Aachen University hospital. Total serum protein was measured using Biuret method (Total Protein Gen. 2 Kit; cobas c 701 module for clinical chemistry; Roche Diagnostics International AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Total CSF protein was measured using turbidimetry (Total Protein Urine/CSF Gen. 3 kit; cobas c 501 module for clinical chemistry; Roche Diagnostics International AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Albumin in CSF and serum was assessed using immunonephelometry (N Antiserum to Human Albumin; BN ProSpec nephelometer, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). IgG was measured in CSF and Serum using immunonephelometry (N Antiserum to Human-IgG, BN ProSpec nephelometer, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). CSF cells and blood count was assessed using flow cytometry.

For measurement of fetuin-A in serum and CSF using ELISA, paired blood and CSF samples of 66 probands were obtained including 27 samples from probands without an inflammatory CNS disease, 35 samples from patients with an inflammatory disease of the CNS and 4 samples without reliable classification in one of the two groups. Clinical data is shown in Table 1, diagnoses are displayed in Table 2.

Table 1. Clinical data of samples for measurement of fetuin-A in CSF and serum with ELISA.

Total (n = 66) Inflammatory (n = 35) Non-Inflammatory (n = 27) Unclear (n = 4)
Age at investigation (years) * 12.49 ± 4,63 (range 1.55–17.88) 12.15 ± 4.51 (range 2.48–17.88) 12.80 ± 4.97 (range 1.55–17.65) 13.44 ± 2.56 (range 10.58–16.57)
Sex distribution
Female 42 21 18 3
male 24 14 9 1
Serum protein (g/dl) * 73.55 ± 5.99 (n = 66) 74.17 ± 5.89 (n = 35) 72.89 ± 6.37 (n = 27) 72.50 ± 2.60 (n = 4)
CSF protein (g/l) * 0.36 ± 0.45 (n = 66) 0.45 ± 0.60 (n = 35) 0.26 ± 0.10 (n = 27) 0.23 ± 0.09 (n = 4)
CSF albumin quotient QAlb * 5.94 ± 9.49 (n = 53) 7.87 ± 12.60 (n = 28) 3.73 ± 2.06 (n = 22) 4.03 ± 1.64 (n = 3)
C-reactive protein (CRP) (
total number 64 35 25 4
CRP elevated (≥ 5 mg/l) 9 4 4 1
CRP negative (< 5 mg/l) 55 31 21 3
Blood-CSF border (BCB) disorder
total number 53 28 22 3
BCB disrupted 11 8 2 1
BCB normal 42 20 20 2
Intrathecal IgG synthesis
total number 48 26 21 2
IgG synthesis present 10 9 1 0
IgG synthesis absent 39 17 20 2

* data shown as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 2. Clinical diagnoses of samples for measurement of fetuin-A in CSF and serum with ELISA.

Inflammatory (n = 35) Non-inflammatory (n = 27) Unclear (n = 4)
diagnosis n Diagnosis n diagnosis N
ADEM 5 ataxia 1 exclusion demyelination disease 1
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis 1 chronic cephalgia 11 exclusion neuroborreliosis 1
clinically isolated syndrome 1 chronic shoulder pain 1 exclusion meningitis 1
demyelinating disease 1 dyskinesia 1 vestibular neuritis 1
facial palsy 10 epilepsy 3
Guillain-Barré syndrome 2 exclusion meningitis 1
Herpes simplex virus encephalitis 1 paresthesia 1
MS 4 paroxysmal movement disorder 1
neuritis nervi optici 3 plexus neuropathy 1
neuroborreliosis 5 pseudotumor cerebri 1
neuromyelitis optica 1 recurrent febrile seizures 1
Varicella zoster virus encephalitis 1 somatization disorder 2
tremor 1
visual loss 1

ADEM acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; MS multiple sclerosis

Glycosylation was studied in 23 paired CSF/serum samples, including 10 controls and 13 samples derived from patients with inflammatory diseases of the CNS. Clinical data and diagnoses are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3. Clinical data of samples for glycosylation studies.

Total (n = 23) Inflammatory (n = 13) control (n = 10)
Age at investigation (years) * 12.95 ± 4.09 (range 3.97–17.65) 11.41 ± 4.64 (range 3.97–17.29) 14.95 ± 1.82 (range 12.13–17.65)
Sex distribution
female 16 8 8
male 7 5 2

* data shown as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 4. Clinicial diagnoses of samples for glycosylation and phosphorylation studies.

Inflammatory for glycosylation studies (n = 13) Inflammatory for phosphorylation studies (n = 33) Control for glycosylation and phosphorylation studies (n = 10)
diagnosis n diagnosis n diagnosis n
ADEM 2 ADEM 4 chronic cephalgia 5
Herpes simplex virus encephalitis 1 Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis 1 epilepsy 1
MS 4 clinically isolated syndrome 4 exclusion meningitis 1
neuroborreliosis 5 facial palsy 10 exclusion neuroborreliosis 1
SSPE 1 Guillain-Barré syndrome 2 somatization disorder 2
Herpes simplex virus encephalitis 1
MS 4
neuritis nervi optici 4

ADEM acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; MS multiple sclerosis; SSPE Sclerosing Subacute Panencephalitis

For phosphorylation studies paired blood and CSF samples of 43 probands were investigated including 10 controls and 33 samples from patients with inflammatory CNS diseases. Clinical diagnoses and data are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Prior to analysis, the samples were blinded.

Table 5. Clinical data of samples for phosphorylation studies.

Total (n = 43) Inflammatory (n = 33) control (n = 10)
Age at investigation (years) * 12.35 ± 4.65 (range 0.50–18.12) 11.57 ± 4.95 (range 0.50–18.12) 14.95 ± 1.82 (range 12.13–17.65)
Sex distribution
female 31 23 8
male 12 10 2
Serum protein (g/dl) * 73.63 ± 5.82 (n = 41) 71.38 ± 14.12 (n = 31) 73.50 ± 5.14 (n = 10)
CSF protein (g/l) * 1.16 ± 4.94 (n = 43) 1.43 ± 5.61 (n = 33) 0.25 ± 0.08 (n = 10)
CSF albumin quotient QAlb * 6.48 ± 11.63 (n = 35) 7.89 ± 13.10 (n = 27) 3.40 ± 1.08 (n = 8)
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Total number 41 32 9
CRP elevated (≥ 5 mg/l) 6 5 1
CRP negative (< 5 mg/l) 35 27 8
Blood-CSF border (BCB) disorder
total number 34 26 8
BCB disrupted 7 7 0
BCB normal 27 19 8
Intrathecal IgG synthesis
Total number 32 24 8
IgG synthesis present 8 8 0
IgG synthesis absent 24 16 8

* data shown as mean ± standard deviation.

ELISA measurement of fetuin-A in serum and CSF

For ELISA studies of fetuin-A concentrations we used the Human Fetuin-A/AHSG DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) as well as 96 well plates and solutions from the DuoSet Ancillary Reagent Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) according to the manufacturers´ recommendations. After dissolving the capture-antibody in 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and dilution to 4 μg/ml in PBS, 100 μl of this capture-antibody solution were transferred to every well of the microtiter plate and incubated overnight at 4°C. The next day the plates were washed twice adding 400 μl PBS-T washing buffer (PBS, 0.05% Tween®20) to every well.

Thereafter the plate was blocked with reagent solution (1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, pH 7.2–7.4) adding 300 μl to each well for one hour at room temperature. Thereafter the plates were again washed twice as described above. Prior to transfer to the wells, serum samples were diluted 1:1,000,000 and CSF samples were diluted 1:4,000 in reagent solution. The standards contained in the ELISA kit (see above) were used to prepare a dilution series with reagent solution consisting of seven standards with concentrations between 31.25 pg/ml and 2 ng/ml. Then 200 μl of test solution or standard were transferred to every well and incubated for two hours at room temperature to allow binding of fetuin-A to the capture antibody. This was followed by three washing cycles (400 μl washing buffer/well). The detection antibody was dissolved in 1 ml reagent solution and diluted to 200 ng/ml in reagent solution. 100 μl of this detection antibody solution were transferred to each well to allow binding of the detection antibody to fetuin-A, leading to a “capture antibody”–“fetuin-A”—“detection antibody” sandwich. After incubation for 2 hours at room temperature additional washing was performed as described above. 100 μl of Streptavidin-HRP solution (1:200 diluted in reagent solution) were transferred to each well and allowed to bind to the detection antibody. After 20 minutes additional washing was performed. This was followed by adding 100 μl substrate solution to each well (1:1 mixture of Color Reagent A (H2O2) and Color Reagent B (tetramethylbenzidine)). After 20 minutes of incubation while protected from light 50 μl of Stop solution (2 NH2SO4) were added to each well and the result was quantified using the Fluostar optima Microplate reader (BMG LABTECH GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany). Color change at 450 nm versus color change at 540 nm reference wavelength was measured. The standards were used to generate a standard line which was then used to determine the respective fetuin-A concentrations. Statistical analysis with multiple linear regression was performed using SPSS statistics (IBM Germany GmbH, Ehningen, Germany). Graphical analysis was performed using SPSS and EXCEL (Microsoft).

Glycosylation and phosphorylation analyses

To study glycosylation of fetuin-A we established a method, based on digestion of CSF and serum samples with glycosidases combined with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot techniques. Glycosidases were PNGase-F and sialiase-Au from an Enzymatic CarboRelease Kit (QA-Bio, KE-DG01, QA-Bio, Inc., Palm Desert, USA). PNGaseF (Peptide-N4-(acetyl-ß-glucosaminyl)-asparagine amidase N-Glycosidase F) cleaves N-acetylglucosamine from Asparagine without affecting the structure of the glycan. Sialidase-Au cleaves sialic acids that are bound to a saccharide chain.

Preliminary tests showed that 10% polyacrylamide gels separated well the cleavage products produced by PNGase-F, Sialidase-Au and O-Glycosidase, and that pretreatment of CSF and serum with sialidase-Au was necessary for digestion of fetuin-A with O-glycosidase, β-galactosidase and glucosaminidase. It was also determined that combined cleavage of CSF and serum with sialidase-Au, O-glycosidase, β-galactosidase and glucosaminidase followed by PNGase-F did not improve on consecutive digestion with sialidase-Au and PNGase-F only. Therefore, the latter combination was used throughout this study to separately assess N-glycosylation (PNGase-F digestion) and sialylation (sialidase-Au digestion). A proteinase inhibitor was added to the final reagent solution to stop proteolytic activity that may be present in sera of patients suffering septicemia [59].

To assess its phosphorylation state, fetuin-A was analysed using Phos-Tag™-polyacrylamide gels (Wako Chemicals GmbH, Neuss, Deutschland) with and without pretreatment with alkaline phosphatase (alkaline phosphatase, bovine, 0.151 U/ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Unlike conventional SDS-PAGE, Phos-Tag™-PAGE separated phospho-isomers of fetuin-A, which were detected by immunblotting. We also studied PNGase-F digestion of fetuin-A revealing complete cleavage of N-glycosyl carbohydrate sidechains after three hours.

For glycosylation studies serum samples were diluted 1:100 in ultrapure water. CSF samples were not diluted. Both serum and CSF were mixed with reaction buffer (5x), protease inhibitor and denaturation solution. This mixture was denatured and afterwards mixed with Triton-X. It was then distributed to three reaction tubes, containing no glycosidase, 1 μl PNGase-F or 1 μl sialidase-Au. Thereafter, the solutions were allowed to digest for three hours at 37°C. After the digestion, 25 μl of solution were taken from each reaction tube and mixed with 5 μl 6x SDS buffer (10 ml 6x SDS buffer consist of: 7 ml 4x stacking gel buffer (0.5M Tris, 0.4% SDS (pH 6.8) + 3 ml glycerin + 0.93 g dithiothreitol (DTT) + 1g SDS + 1.2 mg bromophenol blue sodium salt). This mixture was briefly boiled (5 minutes, 96°C) to stop digestion.

For phosphorylation studies serum samples were diluted 1:10 in physiological saline, CSF samples were not diluted. 80 μl of diluted serum or 80 μl CSF were mixed with 10 μl NEBuffer-3 (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 7,9; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, USA) and 10 μl proteinase-inhibitor. This mixture was split into aliquots and alkaline phosphatase was added or not. The solutions were allowed to digest for one hour at 37°C. To end the digestion, the mixture was heat denatured as above.

Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE or Phos-Tag™-PAGE, respectively. For the glycosylation studies, SDS-PAGE was performed with Mini-PROTEAN® tetra system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, USA) in SDS-buffer according to Laemmli (25mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS) (running time 60 minutes, 20mA), using 10% polyacrylamide gels. For phosphorylation analyses, ready-to-use SuperSep™ Phos-tag™- gels (7.5%, including the collection and separation gel parts, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany) containing Zn2+- Ions were applied using XCell II or XCell Surelock electrophoresis system (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Marietta, USA), filled with running buffer (0.25 mol/l Tris, 1.92 mol/l glycine, 1% SDS).

Both gels from SDS-Page and Phos-Tag™-PAGE were then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Semi dry blots were performed using an OwlTM Semidry Electric Blotter HEP-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Marietta, USA) at 150 mA constant current per gel for 60 minutes. Protein transfer was verified by Ponceau-S staining.

Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C in blocking solution comprising PBS-T (PBS, 0.05% Tween-20) and 5% nonfat dried milk powder. Primary antibody (polyclonal rabbit anti-human fetuin-A, AS5359, made in house [59]) was diluted 1:1000 in blocking solution and incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C. Secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-coupled polyclonal anti-rabbit immunoglobulins, P0217, DAKO, Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) was diluted 1:5000 in blocking solution and incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C. Following antibody incubations membranes were washed three times with PBS-T for 5 minutes. Bound antibody was detected by chemiluminescence in substrate solution (0.1M TRIS/HCl, pH 8.5, 1.25mM 3-aminopthalhydrazide, 0.45mM p-coumaric acid, 0.015% hydrogen peroxide) using ImageQuantTM LAS4000 mini (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany). The amount of phosphorylated fetuin-A among total fetuin-A was quantified using Image J software (Rasband, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Absolute phosphofetuin-A values were calculated from the proportion of phosphorylated fetuin-A among total fetuin-A and the fetuin-A concentrations from ELISA measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistics. Graphical analysis was performed with SPSS and EXCEL.

Results

Fetuin-A concentrations in serum and CSF

Fetuin-A serum concentrations are decreased in probands with inflammatory CNS diseases and elevated C-reactive protein serum levels

Fetuin-A is a negative acute phase protein [60]. To study whether inflammatory processes might be associated with altered serum fetuin-A concentrations we studied samples from 66 probands (Tables 1 and 2). The mean serum fetuin-A concentration was 0.30 mg/ml ± 0.06. A multiple linear regression model was applied to assess relationships between fetuin-A serum concentrations as dependent variable and age, C-reactive protein concentration (cut off: 5 mg/l) and presence of an inflammatory CNS disorder as influencing factors. Analyzing 60 samples we established that increased serum C-reactive protein level was associated with lower serum fetuin-A (p < 0.001). Also, samples of patients with an inflammatory CNS disorder had lower serum fetuin-A (p = 0.006). Fig 1A and 1B depict the serum fetuin-A concentrations of different proband groups as boxplots, distinguished by the C-reactive protein level (Fig 1A) and the presence or absence of an inflammatory CNS disorder (Fig 1B), respectively. The statistical results of the linear regression analysis are shown in S1 Table.

Fig 1. Concentrations of fetuin-A in serum and CSF.

Fig 1

Fig 1 shows the results of the concentration measurements of fetuin-A in CSF and serum. The correlation of fetuin-A in serum (y-axis, mg/ml) with an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (x-axis, (A)) and the presence of neuroinflammatory disease (x-axis, (B)) is shown. The relation between fetuin-A in CSF (y-axis, μg/ml) and a disruption of the blood-CSF barrier (x-axis) is displayed in (C). (D) and (E) show the connection of the serum fetuin-A/total serum protein ratio (y-axis) with an intrathecal IgG synthesis (x-axis, (D)) and the disruption of the blood-CSF barrier (x-axis, (E)). In (F), the link between the CSF fetuin-A/total CSF protein ratio (y-axis) and age (x-axis, years) is shown as a scatter plot. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient QFet (y-axis, x103) and the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient QAlb (x-axis, x103, (G)) and the presence of a blood-CSF barrier disruption (x-axis, (H)). (G) represents a scatter blot double logarithmically. Values of the control group (black) and inflammatory group (white) are plotted separately. (H) shows a boxplot.

CSF fetuin-A levels are higher in probands with disturbed blood-CSF barrier function

To study which factors might influence CSF fetuin-A, we measured CSF fetuin-A levels and post-translational modifications. Mean CSF fetuin-A concentration in all 66 samples was 0.644 μg/ml ± 0.55 and thus roughly 500-fold lower than in serum. Data from 45 probands, including 26 with and 19 without inflammatory CNS diseases were included in the analysis. A multiple linear regression model was applied to assess relationships between CSF fetuin-A level and age at investigation, C-reactive protein concentrations (cut off: 5 mg/l), presence of an inflammatory CNS disorder, blood-CSF barrier function and presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis as confounding factors. A disturbed blood-CSF barrier function was defined at a CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient QAlb > 5 x 10−3 (age ≤ 15 years) or QAlb > 6.5 x 10−3 (age > 15 years), respectively. CSF fetuin-A concentrations were higher in probands with disturbed blood-CSF barrier function (p < 0.001; Fig 1C) and lower in probands with elevated serum C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.001; S1 Fig) (S2 Table). The effect of a blood-CSF barrier dysfunction had a stronger influence on the CSF fetuin-A concentration.

The serum fetuin-A/serum total protein ratio is lower in probands with intrathecal IgG synthesis and in probands with disrupted blood-CSF barrier function

To assess whether not only absolute fetuin-A concentrations but also the proportion of fetuin-A in total serum protein might be affected by different factors we performed a multiple linear regression including the serum fetuin-A/serum total protein ratio as dependent variable and the following as influencing variables: presence of CNS inflammation, age, C-reactive protein concentrations (cut-off 5 mg/l), presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis and presence of disturbed blood-CSF barrier function. Data from 45 probands were included. In the presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis, the serum fetuin-A/serum protein ratio decreased significantly (p = 0.006; Fig 1D). Additionally, we found lower serum fetuin-A/serum protein ratios with a disturbed blood-CSF barrier (p = 0.005, Fig 1E) (S3 Table).

The CSF fetuin-A/CSF total protein ratio increases with age

Like before we performed a multiple linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between the CSF fetuin-A/CSF total protein ratio as dependent variable and the following as confounding factors: presence of CNS inflammation, age, C-reactive protein concentrations (cut-off 5 mg/l), presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis and presence of disturbed blood-CSF barrier function. Only age was found to correlate positively with the share of fetuin-A among total CSF fetuin A, displayed as scatterplot in Fig 1F (p = 0.002) (S4 Table).

The CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient increases with age and with increase of the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient and decreases with elevated C-reactive protein concentration

The quotients CSF IgG/serum IgG (QIgG) and CSF albumin/serum albumin (QAlb) are used to assess intrathecal synthesis of antibodies and blood-CSF barrier function, respectively [48]. Next, we calculated the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient (QFet) from samples derived from 45 probands and performed a multiple linear regression analysis using QFet as dependent and the following as influencing variables: presence of CNS inflammation, age at investigation, C-reactive protein concentrations (cut-off 5 mg/l), presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis, presence of disturbed blood-CSF barrier function and QAlb. Fig 1G shows a strong positive correlation between QFet and QAlb (p < 0.001) as a scatter plot. Both controls and inflammatory groups are shown separately. Data are plotted double logarithmic as is common in Reiber diagrams [48]. Consistent with this finding, an increase of QFet was found in the presence of a blood-CSF barrier disruption (p = 0.001) diagnosed by an elevated QAlb. This is displayed as a boxplot in Fig 1H. In addition, a positive correlation of QFet with age was found (p = 0.007, S1 Fig). An increase with age is also known for QAlb, as described by Reiber [49]. Furthermore, we found a negative correlation between QFet and elevated C-reative- protein concentration (p = 0.01, S1 Fig).

Glycosylation patterns of fetuin-A in CSF and serum

Glycosylation was studied in 23 paired CSF/serum samples, including 10 controls and 13 samples derived from patients with inflammatory diseases of the CNS (Tables 3 and 4). SDS-PAGE immunoblotting frequently detected in both serum and corresponding CSF samples a double band indicating the presence of two forms of fetuin-A of different molecular weight. The double band was reduced to a single molecular weight band following treatment of serum samples with sialidase-Au indicating that differential sialylation was responsible for this double band of fetuin-A. The double bands remained unaffected by digestion with PNGase-F. This is shown for four paired CSF/serum samples in Fig 2A (without double bands) and Fig 2B (with double bands).

Fig 2. Glycosylation patterns of fetuin-A in CSF and serum.

Fig 2

Fig 2 illustrates the results of the glycosylation studies of fetuin-A. (A) and (B) show the glycosylation patterns of fetuin-A with (A) and without (B) double bands. On each membrane, lane 1 shows undigested fetuin-A, lane 2 shows fetuin-A after PNGase-F digestion and lane 3 shows fetuin-A after sialidase-Au digestion. (C) compares the occurrence of double bands in the control group and inflammatory group as a bar chart. (D) displays the kinetic of PNGase-F digestion in serum and CSF. Lane 1 shows undigested fetuin-A, lane 2 shows the pattern after 1 minute of digestion, lane 3 displays the pattern after 10 minutes of digestion and lane 4 shows fetuin-A after 3 hours of PNGase-F digestion.

When comparing the sialylation patterns (double bands) of paired CSF and serum samples from the 23 above mentioned probands, the serum and CSF samples from distinct probands always showed identical sialylation patterns (Fig 2A and 2B) showing that sialylation mostly affected O-linked glycosylation, and was removed by sialidase digestion, but remained unaffected by PNGase-F digestion.

Comparison of sialylation patterns of controls and probands with inflammatory CNS disease revealed that double bands were significantly less frequent among controls (2 out of 10) compared to the inflammatory group (9 out of 13) (Fishers-exact test, two-tailed; p = 0.036). This is depicted as a bar chart in Fig 2C. Our results suggest that desialylated fetuin-A, or asialofetuin-A, is more abundant in inflammatory disorders.

Additionally, we confirmed the presence of two N-glycan carbohydrate chains in fetuin-A [61]. Fig 2D shows that undigested serum fetuin-A (Lane 1) presented as a double band of about 55 and 56 kDa apparent molecular weight in SDS-PAGE/immunoblotting. One minute digestion with PNGase-F resulted in three double bands running at about 55/56, 52/53, and 49/51 kDa representing three different N-glycosylation variants each with or without terminal sialic acid. The 55/56 kDa double band represented undigested 2 N-linked chain fetuin-A, the intermediate 52/53 kDa partially digested single N-glycosylated fetuin-A and the 49/51 kDa completely digested fetuin-A, respectively. After ten minutes of digestion (lane 3) the 55/56 kDa undigested N-glycosylated form of fetuin-A had vanished and after three hours of digestion (lane 4) all fetuin-A had been completely deglycosylated.

Phosphorylation patterns of fetuin-A in serum and CSF

Phosphorylation patterns of fetuin-A were studied in 10 controls and 33 samples derived from patients with inflammatory CNS diseases (Tables 4 and 5). Phosphorylated fetuin-A (or phosphofetuin-A) was detected in sera of 38 of 41 sera studied. Serum samples with phosphorylated fetuin-A had a mean percentage of phosphofetuin-A of total serum fetuin-A 8.7% ± 5.8% (range 2% - 28%). The mean absolute concentration of serum phosphofetuin-A was 0.027 mg/ml ± 0.02 mg/ml (range 0.004 mg/ml – 0.076 mg/ml). Compared to serum samples, significantly less CSF samples were found to contain phosphofetuin-A, i.e. only 17 out of 41 samples (Fishers exact test, two-tailed; p < 0.0001). In the CSF samples in which phosphofetuin-A was detected, the mean percentage of phosphofetuin-A of total CSF fetuin-A was 7.8% ± 8.2% (range 1%–37%). The mean absolute concentration of CSF phosphofetuin-A was 0.07 μg/ml ± 0.16 μg/ml (range 0.004 μg/ml – 0.716 μg/ml), which is 1000-fold lower than in serum. While glycosylation patterns in CSF and serum from the same proband were identical, this was not evident in phosphorylation. In contrast, there was no correlation of absolute and relative phosphofetuin-A levels between CSF and serum from the same subject. Serum and CSF samples from controls and probands with inflammatory diseases did not differ regarding their absolute and relative serum or CSF phosphofetuin-A levels. However, samples deriving from patients with inflammatory CNS diseases showed higher CSF leukocyte counts (Mann Whitney U test, two tailed; p < 0.05) and higher CSF IgG/serum IgG quotients (QIgG) (Mann Whitney U test, two tailed; p < 0.01). Absolute phosphofetuin-A levels in CSF were similar in samples with low and high phosphofetuin-A serum levels.

To study the relationship between CSF relative and absolute phosphofetuin-A levels we performed multiple linear regression analyses on the before mentioned CSF samples with relative CSF phosphofetuin-A levels (CSF phosphofetuin-A/CSF total fetuin-A ratio), absolute CSF phosphofetuin-A levels and relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/relative serum phosphofetuin-A quotient as dependent and the following parameters as influencing variables: age at investigation, presence of an inflammatory CNS disorder, CSF leukocyte count, CSF total protein, QAlb, blood-CSF barrier disruption, presence of intrathecal IgG synthesis and serum C-reactive protein level (cut off: 5 mg/l). The relative CSF phosphofetuin-A level was higher with an increase of QAlb as shown as scatter plot in Fig 3A (p < 0.001). In the presence of CNS inflammation CSF relative phosphofetuin-A levels were found to be decreased. This is displayed as a boxplot in Fig 3B (p = 0.016) (S6 Table). Absolute CSF phosphofetuin-A levels showed an increase with higher QAlb (p < 0.0001). This is shown in Fig 3C. Consistent with this finding, absolute CSF phosphofetuin-A levels were increased in the presence of a blood-CSF barrier disruption (p = 0.003), which is displayed as a boxplot in Fig 3D. The model summary of the linear regression is shown in S7 Table. Lastly, we investigated the relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/serum phosphofetuin-A quotient. We found an increase of the quotient with an increase of QAlb (p < 0.0001). This is shown as a scatter plot in Fig 3E, categorized into control group (black) and neuroinflammatory group (white). In contrast, a decrease of the relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/serum phosphofetuin-A quotient was found in the presence of a neuroinflammatory disorder (p = 0.014). This is displayed in Fig 3F. The model summary can be found in S8 Table.

Fig 3. Phosphorylation patterns of fetuin-A in CSF and serum.

Fig 3

Fig 3 displays the results of the statistical analysis of the phosphorylation studies. (A) and (B) show relative CSF phosphofetuin-A concentrations (y-axis, %) in comparison to the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient (A, x-axis, x103) and in the presence of neuroinflammatory diseases (B). (C) and (D) show absolute phosphofetuin-A levels in CSF (y-axis, μg/ml) in comparison to the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient ((C), x-axis, x103) and a blood-CSF barrier disruption ((D), x-axis). (E) and (F) display the results of the linear regression with the relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/relative serum phosphofetuin-A quotient. This quotient is shown on the y-axis. (E) shows a scatter plot with the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient (x-axis, x103). In (E) the results are shown divided into control group (black) and inflammatory group (white). (F) shows the correlation of the CSF phosphofetuin-A/serum phosphofetuin-A quotient with the presence of a neuroinflammatory disorder (x-axis).

Discussion

We present a pilot study of serum and CSF fetuin-A including its phosphorylation and glycosylation state in children with and without inflammatory CNS diseases. Fetuin-A is an established negative acute phase protein [60] in various inflammatory diseases including pediatric hemolytic-uremic syndrome, pneumococcal pneumonia [62], chronic inflammatory bowel disease [63], rheumatoid arthritis [64] and septicemia [56]. Corroborating these studies, we measured reduced serum fetuin-A in probands with increased serum C-reactive protein levels (Fig 1A). The mean serum fetuin-A concentration of 0.30 mg/ml± 0.06 was lower than in our previous studies [2]. This was due to systematic underestimation of fetuin-A levels in serum and CSF by ELISA compared to nephelometry, which was previously used. Our comparison of both methods nevertheless demonstrated strong and linear correlation of nephelometry and ELISA (not shown). Importantly, both methods consistently reported reduced serum fetuin-A in inflammatory disease.

Three mechanisms have been discussed to account for this decrease. First, inhibition of hepatic fetuin-A synthesis by proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-alpha, IL-1beta or IL-6 [3]. Diseases or injuries of the CNS influence hepatic function and thus the synthesis of fetuin-A. This has been reported for spinal cord injuries and other pathologic conditions [65]. Second, sialidase activity in inflammation will produce asialofetuin-A, which is readily cleared by the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor (for details see above) [16, 18, 19, 62]. Accordingly, we showed increased asialofetuin-A in neuroinflammation. The third mechanism refers to fetuin-A consumption during inhibition of dystrophic calcification attesting to its general role in tissue chaperoning [66, 67]. Inflammation causes cell damage with release of calcium and phosphate from damaged cells that promotes dystopic calcification while simultaneous energy depletion leads to diminished formation of pyrophosphate [68, 69]. Pyrophosphate, magnesium and fetuin-A are known to collectively prevent extracellular calcification [41]. Fetuin-A, in turn, binds to calcium and phosphate to inhibit dystrophic calcification [35]. Fetuin-A forms calciprotein particles (CPP) which can be cleared [70]. Desialylation may serve as a regulatory signal for the degradation of fetuin-A and its clearance after binding calcium and phosphate.

We report that CSF fetuin-A concentrations were about 500 times lower than serum fetuin-A concentrations with mean levels of about 0.3 mg/ml in serum and 0.6 μg/ml in CSF, respectively. These CSF- and serum levels are lower than in fetal CSF or serum but in a similar range as previously reported for adults [2, 54, 55, 71]. Age-dependent reference values are today not established. Further research is required with a larger sample size.

Like in systemic inflammation, serum fetuin-A was also lower in patients with inflammatory CNS disease (Fig 1B). Moreover, the proportion of serum fetuin-A among total serum protein proved lower in probands with disrupted blood-CSF barrier and in probands with intrathecal IgG synthesis (Fig 1D and 1E). This indicates an independent and yet unexplained effect of CNS inflammation on systemic fetuin-A levels. CSF fetuin-A levels were reported in different human diseases. This includes reduced CSF levels indicative of progression of clinically isolated syndrome to definitive MS [72], increased CSF levels in patients with low grade gliomas [73] and in patients with secondary progressive MS [74] as well as decreased CSF fetuin-A in patients with Alzheimer´s disease [58]. Only few studies, however, addressed the relationship between CSF fetuin-A concentrations, blood-CSF barrier function and CNS inflammation, for example focusing on CSF and serum samples deriving from adults with multiple sclerosis. Harris et al. found higher CSF fetuin-A concentrations and higher CSF fetuin-A/plasma fetuin-A quotients in patients with active compared to inactive multiple sclerosis whereas both groups did not differ regarding their serum fetuin-A levels. As the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotients were similar in patients with active and inactive MS the authors concluded that higher CSF fetuin-A levels in active MS resulted from intrathecal fetuin-A synthesis rather than from entry of fetuin-A into the CNS via the blood-CSF barrier [54]. In a further study using an EAE mouse model Harris et al. found reduced disease severity in fetuin-A-deficient mice suggesting that fetuin-A might actively contribute to the immune response in cerebral autoimmune disorders. They further reported on fetuin-A expression of mouse microglial cells after LPS stimulation which points to the possibility of intrathecal fetuin-A synthesis [55]. By analyzing paired proteomes from plasma and CSF in older patients, Dayon and colleagues reported a strong correlation between blood-CSF barrier disturbance and increased CSF fetuin-A levels [75].

We found decreased CSF fetuin-A in probands with increased serum CRP, but increased CSF fetuin-A if blood-CSF barrier function was impaired (Fig 1C). This argues for passive entry of fetuin-A into the CNS during blood-CSF barrier disruption and a simultaneous downregulation related to systemic inflammation. The ratio of CSF fetuin-A to total CSF protein, in turn, was chiefly and positively related to the probands´ age but independent from blood-CSF barrier function and from intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis (Fig 1G). This observation again supports passive entry of fetuin-A into the CNS together with further serum proteins. The high impact of age on CSF fetuin-A levels reflects the fact that CSF levels of serum proteins decrease between birth and 6 months of age, followed by a slight age-related increase (transthyretin, albumin, alpha2-proteins and gamma globulins) [76]. This delayed increase in distinct CSF proteins may be related to the physiological age-related increase of blood-CSF barrier permeability that can be assumed from the known increase of the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient with age [48, 49].

Like total CSF fetuin-A levels, the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient increased with age. This quotient was also increased during blood-CSF barrier dysfunction or higher CSF albumin/serum albumin quotients, again supporting an increased and passive influx of fetuin-A into the CNS during CNS inflammation. In contrast to the above mentioned physiological age-related increase of the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient [48, 49], a comparable age-related increase of this quotient was not present in the here studied pediatric samples. Therefore, the age-related increase of the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient cannot be attributed to an age-related increase of blood-CSFbarrier permeability in the pediatric age group. Alternative explanations might be diminished fetuin-A degradation in the brain compartment or increased fetuin-A degradation in the systemic compartment with increase of age.

The apparent molecular weight of fetuin-A (about 60 kD) is slightly lower than the molecular weight of albumin (about 66 kD). Therefore, the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient should change in a similar fashion as the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient (Fig 1H). On the one hand the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotients measured in this study showed an increase with an increase of the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient as typical for serum-derived proteins entering the CSF. On the other hand, this increase was much slower than anticipated. This raises the question whether fetuin-A may be retained at the blood-CSF barrier or actively consumed in the intrathecal compartment [49].

We confirmed two patterns of glycosylation of fetuin-A comprising two-N-bound glycans and sialylation. As desialylation removed the double fetuin-A bands on western blots this observation was studied in more detail. Double bands were either present or absent from paired serum/CSF samples of distinct probands (Fig 2A and 2B). This indicates that desialylation does not restrict fetuin-A from entering the CNS via the blood-CSF barrier. It also makes an intrathecal synthesis of fetuin-A unlikely as this might lead to different sialylation patterns of fetuin-A in serum and CSF. As already mentioned above, asialofetuin-A is rapidly cleared from circulation after binding to the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor [18, 19]. Among the here studied samples, double bands, i.e. asialofetuin-A, were predominantly detected in the context of inflammatory CNS disorders. This confirms previous studies reporting increased asialofetuin-A in patients with inflammatory diseases. Possibly, in inflammatory conditions fetuin-A experiences a qualitative and quantitative downregulation, mediated by enhanced degradation, diminished functional capabilities, diminished hepatic synthesis and consumption related to calcium release during cell damage.

In contrast to glycosylation, fetuin-A phosphorylation patterns of CSF and serum specimen from distinct probands were not equal, indicating a more complex regulation of phosphorylation in different body compartments. Paired data on CSF and serum phosphofetuin-A were available from 41 probands. None of the three samples negative for phosphofetuin-A in serum was positive for phosphofetuin-A in CSF whereas 19 of the 38 samples positive for phosphofetuin-A in serum were negative for phosphofetuin-A in CSF. On the one hand this might indicate that the metabolically active phosphorylated fetuin-A has restricted access to the CNS, on the other hand this might point to consumption of fetuin-A within the nervous system. However, like global fetuin-A levels in CSF, the strongest predictor for high relative and absolute phosphofetuin-A levels in CSF was the CSF albumin/serum albumin quotient QAlb, which again argues in favor of passive entry of phosphofetuin-A into the CSF. Absolute phosphofetuin-A levels in CSF were higher in probands with blood-CSF barrier disruption, which indicates that phosphorylated fetuin-A also gets access to the CNS in a passive fashion rather than being synthesized in the CNS itself.

Limitations of our pilot study regard the small number of samples, which is insufficient to firmly establish fetuin-A as a marker of CNS inflammation, let alone subtypes thereof. We are aware that the analysis by (Phos-tag) SDS-PAGE and Western-Blot of PTM-fetuin-A also is semi-quantitative at best and could be greatly improved by protein-mass spectrometry of serum and CSF samples. This would however require internal standards, preferably labelled fetuin-A standards, which are not currently freely available. Future studies will need to address these issues.

Summary

In this study we investigated serum and CSF fetuin-A including its glycosylation and phosphorylation state in samples of pediatric patients with and without neuroinflammatory disorders. We report lower serum fetuin-A concentrations in inflammation consistent with its nature as a negative acute phase protein. Our study showed evidence of a passive influx of fetuin-A into the CNS, especially in CNS inflammation. Asialofetuin-A was found more frequent in probands with CNS inflammation, suggesting a possible regulatory function of desialylation for fetuin-A clearance after formation of CPP. We found no differences between serum and CSF samples of each patient. In contrast, phosphofetuin-A was more abundant in serum samples than in CSF, indicating a regulation of influx of fetuin-A over the blood-CSF barrier by phosphorylation. Our findings may help to better understand the function of fetuin-A in CNS inflammation and its potential as a biomarker of neuroinflammatory diseases.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Concentrations of fetuin-A in CSF and CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient.

S1 Fig shows supplementary results of the concentrations measurements of fetuin-A in CSF and serum. The correlation of CSF fetuin-A (y-axis, μg/ml) with an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (x-axis) is displayed as a boxplot in (A). The connection between the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient (y-axis, x103) and age (x-axis, years) is displayed as scatter plot in (B). (C) shows the correlation of the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient (y-axis, x103) with an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (x-axis) as a boxplot.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for fetuin-A concentration (mg/ml) in serum.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for fetuin-A concentration (μg/ml) in cerebrospinal fluid.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for serum fetuin-A/serum total protein ratio.

(PDF)

S4 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for CSF fetuin-A/CSF total protein ratio.

(PDF)

S5 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient.

(PDF)

S6 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for relative CSF phosphofetuin-A concentrations.

(PDF)

S7 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for absolute CSF phosphofetuin-A concentrations.

(PDF)

S8 Table. Multiple linear regression.

Predictors for relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/relative serum phosphofetuin-A quotient.

(PDF)

S1 Raw images. Raw images for Fig 2.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Raw data for the concentration, glycosylation and phosphorylation analysis.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

Anonymised data are available as Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, TRR 219, Project ID 322900939 and Project ID 403041552, both awarded to WJ-D) and by the START program of the Faculty of Medicine of the RWTH Aachen University (grant number 129/14, awarded to MH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Schmid K, Bürgi W. Preparation and properties of the human plasma Ba-alpha2-glycoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961. Mar 4;47:440–53. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90539-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Häusler M, Schäfer C, Osterwinter C, Jahnen-Dechent W. The physiologic development of fetuin-a serum concentrations in children. Pediatr Res. 2009. Dec;66(6):660–4. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181bc3f60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mori K, Emoto M, Inaba M. Fetuin-A: a multifunctional protein. Recent Pat Endocr Metab Immune Drug Discov. 2011. May;5(2):124–46. doi: 10.2174/187221411799015372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohnishi T, Nakamura O, Arakaki N, Miyazaki H, Daikuhara Y. Effects of cytokines and growth factors on phosphorylated fetuin biosynthesis by adult rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994. Apr 15;200(1):598–605. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ohnishi T, Nakamura O, Arakaki N, Daikuhara Y. Effect of phosphorylated rat fetuin on the growth of hepatocytes in primary culture in the presence of human hepatocyte-growth factor. Evidence that phosphorylated fetuin is a natural modulator of hepatocyte-growth factor. Eur J Biochem. 1997. Feb 1;243(3):753–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00753.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heiss A, DuChesne A, Denecke B, Grötzinger J, Yamamoto K, Renné T, et al. Structural basis of calcification inhibition by alpha 2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin-A. Formation of colloidal calciprotein particles. J Biol Chem. 2003. Apr 11;278(15):13333–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210868200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haglund AC, Ek B, Ek P. Phosphorylation of human plasma alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein (human fetuin) in vivo. Biochem J. 2001. Jul 15;357(Pt 2):437–45. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jahnen-Dechent W, Trindl A, Godovac-Zimmermann J, Müller-Esterl W. Posttranslational processing of human alpha 2-HS glycoprotein (human fetuin). Evidence for the production of a phosphorylated single-chain form by hepatoma cells. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 1994. Nov 15;226(1):59–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb20026.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tagliabracci VS, Wiley SE, Guo X, Kinch LN, Durrant E, Wen J, et al. A Single Kinase Generates the Majority of the Secreted Phosphoproteome. Cell. 2015. Jun 18;161(7):1619–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. Jan 8;49(D1):D480–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brockhausen I, Schutzbach J, Kuhns W. Glycoproteins and their relationship to human disease. Acta Anat (Basel). 1998;161(1–4):36–78. doi: 10.1159/000046450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lis H, Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 1993. Nov 15;218(1):1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18347.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wright RD, Cooper D. Glycobiology of leukocyte trafficking in inflammation. Glycobiology. 2014. Dec;24(12):1242–51. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halim A, Nilsson J, Rüetschi U, Hesse C, Larson G. Human urinary glycoproteomics; attachment site specific analysis of N- and O-linked glycosylations by CID and ECD. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. 2012. Apr;11(4):M111.013649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brockhausen I, Stanley P. O-GalNAc Glycans. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, et al., editors. Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2015. [cited 2018 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453030/ [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Demina EP, Pierre WC, Nguyen ALA, Londono I, Reiz B, Zou C, et al. Persistent reduction in sialylation of cerebral glycoproteins following postnatal inflammatory exposure. J Neuroinflammation. 2018. Dec 5;15(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1367-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mahajan VS, Pillai S. Sialic acids and autoimmune disease. Immunol Rev. 2016. Jan;269(1):145–61. doi: 10.1111/imr.12344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ashwell G, Morell AG. The role of surface carbohydrates in the hepatic recognition and transport of circulating glycoproteins. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1974;41(0):99–128. doi: 10.1002/9780470122860.ch3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tolleshaug H. Intracellular segregation of asialo-transferrin and asialo-fetuin following uptake by the same receptor system in suspended hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984. Mar 23;803(3):182–90. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(84)90008-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Karamessinis PM, Malamitsi-Puchner A, Boutsikou T, Makridakis M, Vougas K, Fountoulakis M, et al. Marked defects in the expression and glycosylation of alpha2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin-A in plasma from neonates with intrauterine growth restriction: proteomics screening and potential clinical implications. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. 2008. Mar;7(3):591–9. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700422-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saroha A, Kumar S, Chatterjee BP, Das HR. Jacalin bound plasma O-glycoproteome and reduced sialylation of alpha 2-HS glycoprotein (A2HSG) in rheumatoid arthritis patients. PloS One. 2012;7(10):e46374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Caillot N, Bouley J, Jain K, Mariano S, Luce S, Horiot S, et al. Sialylated Fetuin-A as a candidate predictive biomarker for successful grass pollen allergen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017. Sep;140(3):759–770.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ombrellino M, Wang H, Yang H, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat J, Frazier A, et al. Fetuin, a negative acute phase protein, attenuates TNF synthesis and the innate inflammatory response to carrageenan. Shock Augusta Ga. 2001. Mar;15(3):181–5. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200115030-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jersmann HPA, Dransfield I, Hart SP. Fetuin/alpha2-HS glycoprotein enhances phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and macropinocytosis by human macrophages. Clin Sci Lond Engl 1979. 2003. Sep;105(3):273–8. doi: 10.1042/CS20030126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang H, Li W, Zhu S, Li J, D’Amore J, Ward MF, et al. Peripheral administration of fetuin-A attenuates early cerebral ischemic injury in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010. Mar;30(3):493–504. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li W, Zhu S, Li J, Huang Y, Zhou R, Fan X, et al. A hepatic protein, fetuin-A, occupies a protective role in lethal systemic inflammation. PloS One. 2011;6(2):e16945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dziegielewska KM, Andersen NA, Saunders NR. Modification of macrophage response to lipopolysaccharide by fetuin. Immunol Lett. 1998. Jan;60(1):31–5. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(97)00126-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ardito F, Giuliani M, Perrone D, Troiano G, Lo Muzio L. The crucial role of protein phosphorylation in cell signaling and its use as targeted therapy (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2017. Jun 22; doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Klement E, Medzihradszky KF. Extracellular Protein Phosphorylation, the Neglected Side of the Modification. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. 2017. Jan;16(1):1–7. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O116.064188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nishi H, Shaytan A, Panchenko AR. Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation. Front Genet. 2014;5:270. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sabbir MG. Loss of Ca2+/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase Kinase 2 Leads to Aberrant Transferrin Phosphorylation and Trafficking: A Potential Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Mol Biosci. 2018;5:99. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schmitz M, Villar-Piqué A, Llorens F, Gmitterová K, Hermann P, Varges D, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Total and Phosphorylated α-Synuclein in Patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease and Synucleinopathy. Mol Neurobiol. 2019. May;56(5):3476–83. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1313-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Intan-Shameha AR, Divers TJ, Morrow JK, Graves A, Olsen E, Johnson AL, et al. Phosphorylated neurofilament H (pNF-H) as a potential diagnostic marker for neurological disorders in horses. Res Vet Sci. 2017. Oct;114:401–5. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rankovic M, Zweckstetter M. Upregulated levels and pathological aggregation of abnormally phosphorylated Tau-protein in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. Mar;98:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jahnen-Dechent W, Heiss A, Schäfer C, Ketteler M. Fetuin-A regulation of calcified matrix metabolism. Circ Res. 2011. Jun 10;108(12):1494–509. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.234260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schinke T, Amendt C, Trindl A, Pöschke O, Müller-Esterl W, Jahnen-Dechent W. The serum protein alpha2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin inhibits apatite formation in vitro and in mineralizing calvaria cells. A possible role in mineralization and calcium homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 1996. Aug 23;271(34):20789–96. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Matsui I, Hamano T, Mikami S, Fujii N, Takabatake Y, Nagasawa Y, et al. Fully phosphorylated fetuin-A forms a mineral complex in the serum of rats with adenine-induced renal failure. Kidney Int. 2009. May;75(9):915–28. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schafer C, Heiss A, Schwarz A, Westenfeld R, Ketteler M, Floege J, et al. The serum protein alpha 2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is a systemically acting inhibitor of ectopic calcification. J Clin Invest. 2003. Aug;112(3):357–66. doi: 10.1172/JCI17202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Smith ER, Ford ML, Tomlinson LA, Rajkumar C, McMahon LP, Holt SG. Phosphorylated fetuin-A-containing calciprotein particles are associated with aortic stiffness and a procalcific milieu in patients with pre-dialysis CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc—Eur Ren Assoc. 2012. May;27(5):1957–66. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith ER, Hanssen E, McMahon LP, Holt SG. Fetuin-A-containing calciprotein particles reduce mineral stress in the macrophage. PloS One. 2013;8(4):e60904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Babler A, Schmitz C, Buescher A, Herrmann M, Gremse F, Gorgels T, et al. Microvasculopathy and soft tissue calcification in mice are governed by fetuin-A, magnesium and pyrophosphate. PloS One. 2020;15(2):e0228938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Auberger P, Falquerho L, Contreres JO, Pages G, Le Cam G, Rossi B, et al. Characterization of a natural inhibitor of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase: cDNA cloning, purification, and anti-mitogenic activity. Cell. 1989. Aug 25;58(4):631–40. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90098-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brown WM, Christie DL, Dziegielewska KM, Saunders NR, Yang F. The rat protein encoded by clone pp63 is a fetuin/alpha 2-HS glycoprotein-like molecule, but is it the tyrosine kinase inhibitor pp63? Cell. 1992. Jan 10;68(1):7–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90200-v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rauth G, Pöschke O, Fink E, Eulitz M, Tippmer S, Kellerer M, et al. The nucleotide and partial amino acid sequences of rat fetuin. Identity with the natural tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the rat insulin receptor. Eur J Biochem. 1992. Mar 1;204(2):523–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16663.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Elsas J, Sellhaus B, Herrmann M, Kinkeldey A, Weis J, Jahnen-Dechent W, et al. Fetuin-a in the developing brain. Dev Neurobiol. 2013. May;73(5):354–69. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Terkelsen OB, Jahnen-Dechent W, Nielsen H, Moos T, Fink E, Nawratil P, et al. Rat fetuin: distribution of protein and mRNA in embryonic and neonatal rat tissues. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998. Feb;197(2):125–33. doi: 10.1007/s004290050124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heinen MC, Babler A, Weis J, Elsas J, Nolte K, Kipp M, et al. Fetuin-A protein distribution in mature inflamed and ischemic brain tissue. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0206597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reiber H. The hyperbolic function: A mathematical solution of the protein flux/CSF flow model for blood-CSF barrier function a reply to the letter by S. Öhman (J. Neurol. Sci., 126 (1994) 240–242). J Neurol Sci—J NEUROL SCI. 1994;126(2):243–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reiber H. Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2001. Aug 20;310(2):173–86. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(01)00573-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reiber H. Flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)—a concept common to normal blood-CSF barrier function and to dysfunction in neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci. 1994. Apr;122(2):189–203. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(94)90298-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Reiber H. Proteins in cerebrospinal fluid and blood: barriers, CSF flow rate and source-related dynamics. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003;21(3–4):79–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.El Ayoubi NK, Khoury SJ. Blood Biomarkers as Outcome Measures in Inflammatory Neurologic Diseases. Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother. 2017;14(1):135–47. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0486-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Teunissen CE, Malekzadeh A, Leurs C, Bridel C, Killestein J. Body fluid biomarkers for multiple sclerosis—the long road to clinical application. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015. Oct;11(10):585–96. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Harris VK, Donelan N, Yan QJ, Clark K, Touray A, Rammal M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid fetuin-A is a biomarker of active multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Houndmills Basingstoke Engl. 2013. Oct;19(11):1462–72. doi: 10.1177/1352458513477923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Harris VK, Bell L, Langan RA, Tuddenham J, Landy M, Sadiq SA. Fetuin-A deficiency protects mice from Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) and correlates with altered innate immune response. PloS One. 2017;12(4):e0175575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang H, Sama AE. Anti-inflammatory role of fetuin-A in injury and infection. Curr Mol Med. 2012. Jun;12(5):625–33. doi: 10.2174/156652412800620039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Laughlin GA, McEvoy LK, Barrett-Connor E, Daniels LB, Ix JH. Fetuin-A, a new vascular biomarker of cognitive decline in older adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014. Jul;81(1):134–40. doi: 10.1111/cen.12382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Puchades M, Hansson SF, Nilsson CL, Andreasen N, Blennow K, Davidsson P. Proteomic studies of potential cerebrospinal fluid protein markers for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003. Oct 21;118(1–2):140–6. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nawratil P, Lenzen S, Kellermann J, Haupt H, Schinke T, Müller-Esterl W, et al. Limited proteolysis of human alpha2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin. Evidence that a chymotryptic activity can release the connecting peptide. J Biol Chem. 1996. Dec 6;271(49):31735–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lebreton JP, Joisel F, Raoult JP, Lannuzel B, Rogez JP, Humbert G. Serum concentration of human alpha 2 HS glycoprotein during the inflammatory process: evidence that alpha 2 HS glycoprotein is a negative acute-phase reactant. J Clin Invest. 1979. Oct;64(4):1118–29. doi: 10.1172/JCI109551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yoshioka Y, Gejyo F, Marti T, Rickli EE, Bürgi W, Offner GD, et al. The complete amino acid sequence of the A-chain of human plasma alpha 2HS-glycoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1986. Feb 5;261(4):1665–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Janapatla RP, Hsu MH, Liao WT, Chien KY, Lee HY, Chiu CH. Low Serum Fetuin-A as a Biomarker to Predict Pneumococcal Necrotizing Pneumonia and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Children. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. Mar;95(13):e3221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ma P, Feng Y chao. Decreased serum fetuin-A levels and active inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Med Sci. 2014. Jul;348(1):47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sato H, Kazama JJ, Wada Y, Kuroda T, Narita I, Gejyo F, et al. Decreased levels of circulating alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/Fetuin-A (AHSG) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn. 2007;46(20):1685–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Goodus MT, McTigue DM. Hepatic dysfunction after spinal cord injury: A vicious cycle of central and peripheral pathology? Exp Neurol. 2020. Mar;325:113160. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rudloff S, Jahnen-Dechent W, Huynh-Do U. Tissue chaperoning-the expanded functions of fetuin-A beyond inhibition of systemic calcification. Pflugers Arch. 2022. Apr 11; doi: 10.1007/s00424-022-02688-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rudloff S, Janot M, Rodriguez S, Dessalle K, Jahnen-Dechent W, Huynh-Do U. Fetuin-A is a HIF target that safeguards tissue integrity during hypoxic stress. Nat Commun. 2021. Jan 22;12(1):549. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20832-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fratzl-Zelman N, Fratzl P, Hörandner H, Grabner B, Varga F, Ellinger A, et al. Matrix mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cell cultures initiated by beta-glycerophosphate pulse. Bone. 1998. Dec;23(6):511–20. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00139-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ghadially FN. As you like it, Part 3: A critique and historical review of calcification as seen with the electron microscope. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2001. Jun;25(3):243–67. doi: 10.1080/019131201300343874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jahnen-Dechent W, Büscher A, Köppert S, Heiss A, Kuro-O M, Smith ER. Mud in the blood: the role of protein-mineral complexes and extracellular vesicles in biomineralisation and calcification. J Struct Biol. 2020. Oct 1;212(1):107577. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dziegielewska KM, Matthews N, Saunders NR, Wilkinson G. alpha 2HS-glycoprotein is expressed at high concentration in human fetal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993. Feb;8(1):22–7. doi: 10.1159/000263743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tumani H, Lehmensiek V, Rau D, Guttmann I, Tauscher G, Mogel H, et al. CSF proteome analysis in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS): candidate markers for conversion to definite multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2009. Mar 13;452(2):214–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.01.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ribom D, Westman-Brinkmalm A, Smits A, Davidsson P. Elevated levels of alpha-2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein in CSF of patients with low-grade gliomas. Tumour Biol J Int Soc Oncodevelopmental Biol Med. 2003. Apr;24(2):94–9. doi: 10.1159/000071082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ottervald J, Franzén B, Nilsson K, Andersson LI, Khademi M, Eriksson B, et al. Multiple sclerosis: Identification and clinical evaluation of novel CSF biomarkers. J Proteomics. 2010. Apr 18;73(6):1117–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dayon L, Cominetti O, Wojcik J, Galindo AN, Oikonomidi A, Henry H, et al. Proteomes of Paired Human Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma: Relation to Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Older Adults. J Proteome Res. 2019. Mar 1;18(3):1162–74. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Barnard K, Herold R, Siemes H, Siegert M. Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid proteins in children by high-resolution agarose gel electrophoresis. J Child Neurol. 1998. Feb;13(2):51–8. doi: 10.1177/088307389801300201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pavel Strnad

11 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-12868Post-translational modifications glycosylation and phosphorylation of the major hepatic plasma protein fetuin-A are associated with severity of CNS inflammation in childrenPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Jahnen-Dechent,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. As you can see, both reviewers appreciated your work, but also came up with numerous suggestions how to further improve it.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 25 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pavel Strnad

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

  "This research project is supported by the START-Program of the Faculty of Medicine of the RWTH Aachen University (grant number 129/14) (MH) and the German Research Foundation (DFG, TRR 219, Project ID 322900939) (WJD)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. 

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of this manuscript have done an exceptional job describing the complexities of CNS inflammation and demonstrated the usefulness of Fetuin-A as a potential biomarker of inflammation. Readers will be well equipped with the experimental details given in this manuscript to study Fetuin-A and its glycosylation and phosphorylation.

I would like to recommend the following additional information that could be added to the manuscript:

1. Age and sex distribution of the study cohorts including controls be provided if not already

2. Provide an explanation of dietary influence on Fetuin-A and how your study controlled that influence

3. Provide CSF sample collection details. Explain how the effects of rostrocaudal gradient on CSF Fetuin-A was controlled in this study.

4. Provide details on the inflammatory conditions and controls. A table with patient demographics and clinical conditions would be helpful.

5. Explain if Fetuin-A can discriminate between different CNS inflammatory/autoimmune conditions as well as Systemic inflammation Vs CNS inflammation.

6. Age specific reference intervals for Fetuin-A should be the next step once a larger data set is available

Reviewer #2: The Authors studied CSF and serum concentrations of total as well as post-translationally modified fetuin-A in a group of 66 children (including controls and various CNS inflammatory diseases). The aim of the study is excellently described on p. 8, rows 140-144. They came to the conclusion that 1) fetuin-A in the CSF is blood-derived rather than being synthesised intrathecally (probably the most important result of the study); 2) asialofetuin-A was found more frequently in patients with CNS inflammation; 3) phosphofetuin-A was more abundant in serum samples than in CSF, possibly indicating a regulation of influx of fetuin-A over the blood-CSF barrier by phosphorylation.

In my opinion, the study has been executed very carefully and is of significant theoretical importance. The main strength of the study lies in the quantitative assessment (within the methodological limits of the assays applied) of both total and phosphorylated protein forms, a concept that should perhaps be applied to several other proteins (and maybe other post-translational modifications) when studying the origin of CSF proteins (blood-derived vs. intrathecally synthesised). Qualitative analysis of glycosylation patterns in CSF and serum is also very interesting. Many interesting aspects of fetuin-A physiology and possible relevance for CNS inflammation are carefully reviewed by the Authors that apparently are experts on fetuin-A biology. However, I have not been convinced by their arguments that CSF fetuin-A measurement can be of any significant clinical value in routine practice (there is no intrathecal fetuin-A synthesis; decreased concentrations and relatively increased asialofetuin-A were found by the Authors also in serum, so why to investigate CSF for this protein?) In this context, I would suggest to reconsider an appropriate manuscript title (also see below under Major criticisms, point 1).

In my opinion, the Manuscript deserves Major revision before acceptance. Major criticisms are:

1) clinical data of the subjects are not provided, except for partial information on page 17 (lines 339-343) concerning samples for glycosylation analysis. This should be definitely corrected. Definition of control group and diagnoses of patients in the inflammatory group should be provided in the Methods section under the Heading Probands. Since number of samples analyzed by various assays (total fetuin-A, glycosylation, phosphorylation) differs, number of patients in both groups (controls and CNS inflammation) should be provided separately for each assay. Looking at diagnoses of a subgroup mentioned at p.17, this is a mix of various CNS inflammatory diseases with substantially different CSF profiles and different immunopathogenesis, most of them usually associated with normal serum CRP levels. However, this is acceptable in a pilot study.

How was the severity of CNS inflammation assessed? This is important if the Authors wish to retain in the Article title that post-translational modifications of fetuin-A are associated with SEVERITY (rather than presence) of CNS inflammation in children.

Basic information about methods used for CSF analysis, especially total protein, albumin and IgG should be provided as well (method - e.g. turbidimetric or dye-binding for total protein, reagent kit, and instrument).

2) Throughout the text, the Authors should consider using the term "Blood-CSF barrier" instead of "Blood-brain barrier", especially in the context of CSF/Serum protein quotients.

3) The term "ratio" could possibly be replaced by "quotient" as the latter is used by most authorities in CSF analysis, including prof. H. Reiber and prof. E.Thompson. In Thompson´s book Proteins of the cerebrospinal fluid (Elsevier 2005, ISBN 0-12-369369-1), a review of appropriate terms is provided on pp. 10-11: Ratio is defined as the result of dividing the amount of one protein (e.g. IgG) in CSF by the amount of another (e.g. albumin) also in the CSF, whereas Quotient is the result of dividing the amount of a given protein (e.g. albumin) in the CSF by the amount of the same protein again (e.g. albumin) in the serum.

4) Throughout the Text and Figures, axis label for CSF/Serum quotients should contain x10^3 and NOT 10^-3 E.g., for CSF fetuin-A 0,6 mg/L and Serum fetuin-A 0,3 g/L = 300 mg/L, the CSF/S quotient is 0,002 - this should be multiplied by a factor of 1000 if we want to get convenient numbers (in this case, 2) on the x-axis.

5) Figure 1G (CSF/S Q of total Fetuin-A on the y axis versus Q Alb on the x axis) seems to me to be perhaps the most important. Please try to indicate 2 patient subgroups (controls vs. CNS inflammation) in this Figure by using different marks or colours for these 2 patient groups. The same might be of value for Fig. 3E. (Concerning Fig. 3E, I am not sure whether absolute values of phosphofetuin-A CSF/Serum concentration quotients could be more appropriate than relative values on the y-axis.)

Although not obligatory, I would recommend at least briefly discuss in the Discussion section: 1) why CSF/serum fetuin A quotients are somewhat lower than anticipated based on the molecular weight of this protein (compared with albumin with M.w. of 67 kDa, fetuin-A should have CSF/serum quotients close to Q albumin or somewhat higher). Since the CSF/S quotients depend rather on hydrodynamic radius than on M.w., have the Authors any information about the hydrodynamic radius of fetuin-A compared to albumin? (partly discussed on p. 25 rows 516-523, but many Q fetuin-A values are much lower than corresponding Q Alb values also in patients with normal Q Alb), 2) the Authors tried to perform some kind of quantitation of the phosphorylated fetuin-A; what about the precision of these data (%CV in repeated experiments or from the literature etc.), and do the Authors think such quantitative attempts are possible and worthwhile for their glycosylation studies? 3) The Authors used enzyme digestion to study post-translational modifications of fetuin-A. It would be interesting if they wish at least to mention the use of mass spectrometry for such a purpose and why they did not choose this analytical tool in their study (not suitable? not available? other reason?)

Minor Criticisms:

Abstract, p.2, row 23: MS - abbreviation not explained (multiple sclerosis?), I would recommend to drop it from the Abstract since the role of fetuin-A as a biomarker for MS is far from being firmly established.

p.4 row 52 and p.22 row 449: Greek symbols or letters should be used consistenly for TNF-alpha and IL-1beta throughout the text

p.10 row 188 - "multiple" instead of "multipe"

p.10 - subscript should be used appropriately in the formulas of chemical compounds (e.g. for hydrogen peroxide)

p. 11 row 192: "sodium dodecyl sulfate" instead of "sodiumdodecylsulfat"; row 208: "polyacrylamide" instead of "polyacrylamid"

p.13 row 237: "2+" should be in superscript

p.13 row. 246 please provide brief description of the in-house AS5359 anti-human fetuin-A antibody, or provide an appropriate reference in the Reference list

p. 16 rows 307-308: it is not clear what the Authors wished to say, and it seems to be related to Fig. 1F rather than Fig. 1G; please try to formulate in a clearer way

p. 16 row 317: Fig. 1G rather than 1H; row 321: Fig. 1H rather than 1G

p. 17 rows 339-343: this should be stated in the Methods section (see above)

p.19 row 392: incorrect unit for the range of CSF phospho fetuin-A concentrations (mg/ml instead of micrograms/ml)

p. 22 row 444: please use "CSF" instead of "liquor"

p. 26 row 533: "in the context" rather than "in the contexts"

Tables S6 and S7 have identical Table title; I would recommend either to use different Table titles or to merge in one Table

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0268592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268592.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Sep 2022

The following text is also contained in the file "response to reviewers" where it is formatted for better reading.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

We now fully share all data as an anonymized data set contained in the Supporting Information file “S1_raw data”. All uncropped and unadjusted blot images are provided in the Supporting Information file “S1_raw_images”.

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

We thank reviewer for pointing out several typographical or grammatical errors, which we have now corrected.

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of this manuscript have done an exceptional job describing the complexities of CNS inflammation and demonstrated the usefulness of Fetuin-A as a potential biomarker of inflammation. Readers will be well equipped with the experimental details given in this manuscript to study Fetuin-A and its glycosylation and phosphorylation.

Thank you very much for this overall very positive feedback.

I would like to recommend the following additional information that could be added to the manuscript:

1. Age and sex distribution of the study cohorts including controls be provided if not already

2. Provide an explanation of dietary influence on Fetuin-A and how your study controlled that influence

3. Provide CSF sample collection details. Explain how the effects of rostrocaudal gradient on CSF Fetuin-A was controlled in this study.

4. Provide details on the inflammatory conditions and controls. A table with patient demographics and clinical conditions would be helpful.

5. Explain if Fetuin-A can discriminate between different CNS inflammatory/autoimmune conditions as well as Systemic inflammation Vs CNS inflammation.

6. Age specific reference intervals for Fetuin-A should be the next step once a larger data set is available

I would like to recommend the following additional information that could be added to the manuscript:

1. Age and sex distribution of the study cohorts including controls be provided if not already

The requested information is now available for three cohorts concentration, glycosylation, and phosphorylation.

2. Provide an explanation of dietary influence on Fetuin-A and how your study controlled that influence

Unfortunately, dietary influence was not study or controlled.

3. Provide CSF sample collection details. Explain how the effects of rostrocaudal gradient on CSF Fetuin-A was controlled in this study.

We agree that concentrations of different CSF components may differ depending on whether CSF was obtained directly from the ventricles or from CSF obtained during lumbar punctures. All samples of this investigation had been obtained by lumbar punctures, which is the standard method to obtain cerebrospinal fluid in children for diagnostic purposes. Therefore, the rostrocaudal gradient of CSF cannot account for differences observed between groups.

4. Provide details on the inflammatory conditions and controls. A table with patient demographics and clinical conditions would be helpful.

Information is now provided as tables of anonymous data in the Materials/Probands section. Serum chemistry, clinical data, and diagnosis available to us are all included.

5. Explain if Fetuin-A can discriminate between different CNS inflammatory/autoimmune conditions as well as Systemic inflammation Vs CNS inflammation.

This is indeed an interesting point. Depending on whether there is systemic inflammation or CNS inflammation, fetuin-A expression may indeed change as we have recently observed in kidney fetuin expression under hypoxia. Healthy kidney does not produce fetuin-A mRNA, but hypoxic kidney does (ref. 67). In pathological conditions, expression of fetuin-A mRNA may also be induced in the choroid plexus, an established extrahepatic fetuin-A mRNA expressing tissue. As much as we would like to clarify this issue, it is beyond the scope of this pilot study due to limited quality and quantity of available material. We mention this as a limitation of our study in the discussion.

6. Age specific reference intervals for Fetuin-A should be the next step once a larger data set is available.

Again, we fully agree. Like the differentiation of systemic vs. CNS inflammation this requires a larger number of samples.

Reviewer #2: The Authors studied CSF and serum concentrations of total as well as post-translationally modified fetuin-A in a group of 66 children (including controls and various CNS inflammatory diseases). The aim of the study is excellently described on p. 8, rows 140-144. They came to the conclusion that 1) fetuin-A in the CSF is blood-derived rather than being synthesised intrathecally (probably the most important result of the study); 2) asialofetuin-A was found more frequently in patients with CNS inflammation; 3) phosphofetuin-A was more abundant in serum samples than in CSF, possibly indicating a regulation of influx of fetuin-A over the blood-CSF barrier by phosphorylation.

In my opinion, the study has been executed very carefully and is of significant theoretical importance. The main strength of the study lies in the quantitative assessment (within the methodological limits of the assays applied) of both total and phosphorylated protein forms, a concept that should perhaps be applied to several other proteins (and maybe other post-translational modifications) when studying the origin of CSF proteins (blood-derived vs. intrathecally synthesised). Qualitative analysis of glycosylation patterns in CSF and serum is also very interesting. Many interesting aspects of fetuin-A physiology and possible relevance for CNS inflammation are carefully reviewed by the Authors that apparently are experts on fetuin-A biology. However, I have not been convinced by their arguments that CSF fetuin-A measurement can be of any significant clinical value in routine practice (there is no intrathecal fetuin-A synthesis; decreased concentrations and relatively increased asialofetuin-A were found by the Authors also in serum, so why to investigate CSF for this protein?) In this context, I would suggest to reconsider an appropriate manuscript title (also see below under Major criticisms, point 1).

In my opinion, the Manuscript deserves Major revision before acceptance. Major criticisms are:

We would like to thank reviewer 2 for the interest taken in our work, the meticulous review, and the many good suggestions how to improve the manuscript. We gladly accepted all changes suggested by the reviewer.

1) clinical data of the subjects are not provided, except for partial information on page 17 (lines 339-343) concerning samples for glycosylation analysis. This should be definitely corrected. Definition of control group and diagnoses of patients in the inflammatory group should be provided in the Methods section under the Heading Probands. Since number of samples analyzed by various assays (total fetuin-A, glycosylation, phosphorylation) differs, number of patients in both groups (controls and CNS inflammation) should be provided separately for each assay. Looking at diagnoses of a subgroup mentioned at p.17, this is a mix of various CNS inflammatory diseases with substantially different CSF profiles and different immunopathogenesis, most of them usually associated with normal serum CRP levels. However, this is acceptable in a pilot study.

We apologize for being so terse in the first version of our manuscript. This information is now provided as tables of anonymous data in the Materials/Probands section. Serum chemistry, clinical data and diagnosis available to us

How was the severity of CNS inflammation assessed? This is important if the Authors wish to retain in the Article title that post-translational modifications of fetuin-A are associated with SEVERITY (rather than presence) of CNS inflammation in children.

We agree that we should tone down on claims about fetuin-a and severity of CNS inflammation. We deleted this from the title.

Basic information about methods used for CSF analysis, especially total protein, albumin and IgG should be provided as well (method - e.g. turbidimetric or dye-binding for total protein, reagent kit, and instrument).

All routine clinical chemistry assays were performed by the clinical chemistry laboratory of RWTH Aachen Clinics. Information obtained from the lab is now included in Methods. Fetuin-A analyses were performed in our own laboratory.

2) Throughout the text, the Authors should consider using the term "Blood-CSF barrier" instead of "Blood-brain barrier", especially in the context of CSF/Serum protein quotients.

We thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. Done throughout!

3) The term "ratio" could possibly be replaced by "quotient" as the latter is used by most authorities in CSF analysis, including prof. H. Reiber and prof. E.Thompson. In Thompson´s book Proteins of the cerebrospinal fluid (Elsevier 2005, ISBN 0-12-369369-1), a review of appropriate terms is provided on pp. 10-11: Ratio is defined as the result of dividing the amount of one protein (e.g. IgG) in CSF by the amount of another (e.g. albumin) also in the CSF, whereas Quotient is the result of dividing the amount of a given protein (e.g. albumin) in the CSF by the amount of the same protein again (e.g. albumin) in the serum.

We changed the wording quotient and ratio as throughout as suggested by reviewer.

4) Throughout the Text and Figures, axis label for CSF/Serum quotients should contain x10^3 and NOT 10^-3 E.g., for CSF fetuin-A 0,6 mg/L and Serum fetuin-A 0,3 g/L = 300 mg/L, the CSF/S quotient is 0,002 - this should be multiplied by a factor of 1000 if we want to get convenient numbers (in this case, 2) on the x-axis.

Done as suggested.

5) Figure 1G (CSF/S Q of total Fetuin-A on the y axis versus Q Alb on the x axis) seems to me to be perhaps the most important. Please try to indicate 2 patient subgroups (controls vs. CNS inflammation) in this Figure by using different marks or colours for these 2 patient groups. The same might be of value for Fig. 3E. (Concerning Fig. 3E, I am not sure whether absolute values of phosphofetuin-A CSF/Serum concentration quotients could be more appropriate than relative values on the y-axis.)

Done as suggested. Absolute values of phosphofetuin-A cannot be obtained with phostag-PAGE and immunoblotting. This will have to await protein-MS with internal (labeled) standards. We mention this in the discussion.

Although not obligatory, I would recommend at least briefly discuss in the Discussion section:

1) why CSF/serum fetuin A quotients are somewhat lower than anticipated based on the molecular weight of this protein (compared with albumin with M.w. of 67 kDa, fetuin-A should have CSF/serum quotients close to Q albumin or somewhat higher). Since the CSF/S quotients depend rather on hydrodynamic radius than on M.w., have the Authors any information about the hydrodynamic radius of fetuin-A compared to albumin? (partly discussed on p. 25 rows 516-523, but many Q fetuin-A values are much lower than corresponding Q Alb values also in patients with normal Q Alb).

We have studied the physical chemistry of fetuin-A and the calciprotein particles containing fetuin-A in detail. The distribution quotients may in fact be greatly affected by the state of fetuin-A at the time of sampling. Whether or not fetuin-A circulated as a monomer or as part of the colloidal calciprotein particles is not known. In addition, glycosylation and phosphorylation may both affect the hydrodynamic radius because they change the net charge of the fetuin-A molecule, albeit much less than agglomeration of fetuin-A into calciprotein particles.

We previously determined the hydrodynamic radius of fetuin-A monomer (3.1±0.2 nm) and of calciprotein particles ( up to 150 nm).

1. Rochette, C. N. et al. A Shielding Topology Stabilizes the Early Stage Protein–Mineral Complexes of Fetuin‐A and Calcium Phosphate: A Time‐Resolved Small‐Angle X‐ray Study. Chembiochem 10, 735–740 (2009).

2. Wald, J. et al. Formation and stability kinetics of calcium phosphate –fetuin-A colloidal particles probed by time-resolved dynamic light scattering. Soft Matter 7, 2869–2874 (2011)

3. Heiss, A. & Schwahn, D. Handbook of Biomineralization: Biological Aspects and Structure Formation. 415–431 (2008) doi:10.1002/9783527619443.ch24.

Presently, we can only speculate on the aggregation state of fetuin-A in blood vs. CSF, but we will certainly come back to these questions once better methods for the detection of calciprotein particles in blood and CSF have been developed. This is the topic of ongoing research in our and other labs.

2) the Authors tried to perform some kind of quantitation of the phosphorylated fetuin-A; what about the precision of these data (%CV in repeated experiments or from the literature etc.), and do the Authors think such quantitative attempts are possible and worthwhile for their glycosylation studies?

We completely agree that deglycosylation or phostag-PAGE in combination with immunoblotting are semi-quantitative at best. Western Blotting simply is NOT strictly quantitative. However, the method was suitable for this pilot study. We did not have the means and funds to perform quantitative protein-MS on the relatively large number of samples. As one of few laboratories in the world we have decades of experience with fetuin specific antibodies, both homemade and commercial. We prefer homemade antibodies, because in our hands they invariably outperform commercial products in terms of specificity and sensitivity.

3) The Authors used enzyme digestion to study post-translational modifications of fetuin-A. It would be interesting if they wish at least to mention the use of mass spectrometry for such a purpose and why they did not choose this analytical tool in their study (not suitable? not available? other reason?)

In collaborative work, we performed protein-MS many times. Like blotting, conventional protein-MS counting percentage of coverage etc. is also semi-quantitative at best. Truly quantitative protein phosphorylation analysis by MS requires labeling and standard peptides to establish recovery and sensitivity for the detection of each phospho/vs dephospho peptides in a given MS instrument (Kusebauch, U. et al. Human SRMAtlas: A Resource of Targeted Assays to Quantify the Complete Human Proteome. Cell 166, 766 778 (2016). Senior author WJ-D personally witnessed this first-class work during his Sabbatical 2015 at the Systems Biology Institute in Seattle/Washington. Truly quantitative protein-MS work cannot presently be performed in our clinical routine lab, let alone in our own lab.

Minor Criticisms:

Abstract, p.2, row 23: MS - abbreviation not explained (multiple sclerosis?), I would recommend to drop it from the Abstract since the role of fetuin-A as a biomarker for MS is far from being firmly established.

We agree. The abstract now states "under investigation as a biomarker". Now row 26.

p.4 row 52 and p.22 row 449: Greek symbols or letters should be used consistenly for TNF-alpha and IL-1beta throughout the text

done

p.10 row 188 - "multiple" instead of "multipe"

done, now row 239

p.10 - subscript should be used appropriately in the formulas of chemical compounds (e.g. for hydrogen peroxide)

done e.g. row 233/234

p. 11 row 192: "sodium dodecyl sulfate" instead of "sodiumdodecylsulfat"; row 208: "polyacrylamide" instead of "polyacrylamid"

done now row 244 and 262

p.13 row 237: "2+" should be in superscript

done, row 290

Thank you so much for pointing out these typos!

p.13 row. 246 please provide brief description of the in-house AS5359 anti-human fetuin-A antibody, or provide an appropriate reference in the Reference list

we added reference 59, which describes the use of this polyclonal antiserum for immunoblotting. Now row 299

p. 16 rows 307-308: it is not clear what the Authors wished to say, and it seems to be related to Fig. 1F rather than Fig. 1G; please try to formulate in a clearer way

p. 16 row 317: Fig. 1G rather than 1H; row 321: Fig. 1H rather than 1G

Indeed, there was a mixup of the figures. This was corrected. Now row 366

p. 17 rows 339-343: this should be stated in the Methods section (see above)

done as suggested, see above

p.19 row 392: incorrect unit for the range of CSF phospho fetuin-A concentrations (mg/ml instead of micrograms/ml)

corrected row 453, Thank you for spotting this error.

p. 22 row 444: please use "CSF" instead of "liquor"

done row 509

p. 26 row 533: "in the context" rather than "in the contexts"

done row 602

Tables S6 and S7 have identical Table title; I would recommend either to use different Table titles or to merge in one Table

Done

Once again we thank both reviewers for their meticulous review of our manuscript.

Decision Letter 1

Pavel Strnad

26 Sep 2022

Post-translational modifications glycosylation and phosphorylation of the major hepatic plasma protein fetuin-A are associated with CNS inflammation in children.

PONE-D-22-12868R1

Dear Dr. Jahnen-Dechent,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pavel Strnad

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional): Thank you for submitting this nice work to PLoS One!

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I congratulate the authors on their excellent research in a very complex field of neurology. Hopefully this work eventually leads to translational diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in the management of CNS inflammatory conditions.

There is a great clinical need for acute markers of neuro-inflammation in both paediatric and adult patients that can diagnose inflammatory conditions at a very early stage of disease progression. This would assist neurologists in the differential diagnoses of inflammation due to autoimmunity, infection, cancers and anatomical causes as well as in following the response to treatment and the course of the disease.

Existing inflammatory biomarkers such as CSF Neopterin and Cytokines/Chemokines are highly sensitive for neuro-inflammation and they correlate very well with the state of inflammation following treatment with immunotherapy; but unfortunately they are nonspecific markers of inflammation. The hunt for a differential biomarker of CNS inflammation continues.

Due to the acute nature of neuroinflammation, it is also vital for the specialist laboratory to be able to test and report these biomarkers within a day or two to limit the damage that ensues CNS inflammation. This would require assays which can be fully automated, are random access and fit for clinical purposes.

Wish you the best for your future research.

Reviewer #2: The Authors did a tremendous amount of work, and although their manuscript is long and not easy to follow, I believe it paves new and promising ways to analyse not only fetuin A but possibly also other CSF proteins.

I appreciate exhausting answers to the Rewievers´ questions and meticulous revision of the Manuscript.

I would only recommend to check/correct the following issues in Tables 1 and 5: Serum protein is given in g/l and not g/dl. Also, "Blood-CSF barrier (BCB) disorder" might be preferable to the term "Blood-CSF border ..." in these Tables. Finally, on Page 11, row 234, there is missing "d" in the word "sialidase-Au". In a legend to Fig. 1(G) (page 16, row 382), "scatter plot" should be used instead of "scatter blot".

The Reviewer would like to take this opportunity to wish the Authors lasting enthusiasm and many success in their further research.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sushil Bandodkar

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Pavel Strnad

29 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-12868R1

Post-translational modifications glycosylation and phosphorylation of the major hepatic plasma protein fetuin-A are associated with CNS inflammation in children

Dear Dr. Jahnen-Dechent:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pavel Strnad

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Concentrations of fetuin-A in CSF and CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient.

    S1 Fig shows supplementary results of the concentrations measurements of fetuin-A in CSF and serum. The correlation of CSF fetuin-A (y-axis, μg/ml) with an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (x-axis) is displayed as a boxplot in (A). The connection between the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient (y-axis, x103) and age (x-axis, years) is displayed as scatter plot in (B). (C) shows the correlation of the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient (y-axis, x103) with an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (x-axis) as a boxplot.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for fetuin-A concentration (mg/ml) in serum.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for fetuin-A concentration (μg/ml) in cerebrospinal fluid.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for serum fetuin-A/serum total protein ratio.

    (PDF)

    S4 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for CSF fetuin-A/CSF total protein ratio.

    (PDF)

    S5 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for the CSF fetuin-A/serum fetuin-A quotient.

    (PDF)

    S6 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for relative CSF phosphofetuin-A concentrations.

    (PDF)

    S7 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for absolute CSF phosphofetuin-A concentrations.

    (PDF)

    S8 Table. Multiple linear regression.

    Predictors for relative CSF phosphofetuin-A/relative serum phosphofetuin-A quotient.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw images. Raw images for Fig 2.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Raw data for the concentration, glycosylation and phosphorylation analysis.

    (XLSX)

    Data Availability Statement

    Anonymised data are available as Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES