Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Nov 1;109(5):2225–2232. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2225

A model for astral stimulation of cytokinesis in animal cells

PMCID: PMC2115833  PMID: 2808526

Abstract

A model is proposed in which stimulation of cortical cytoplasm occurs near the distal ends of astral rays. Levels of stimulation sufficient to cause furrowing occur only in equatorial zones between asters. The model can account for positioning of furrows in very large cells (fertilized eggs of amphibians, birds, and fish) and in cells with several mitotic apparatuses (insects). Finally, the model correctly predicts the positioning and occurrence of furrowing in two experiments in which cellular shape was manipulated into either an hourglass or a cylindrical form before division. These results are consistent with equatorial stimulation theories in which mitotic asters differentially stimulate the future furrow region (equatorial cortex). The results are not consistent with models requiring differential stimulation of nonfurrowing, polar regions of the cell.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armas-Portela R., Paweletz N., Zimmermann H. P., Ghosh S. Microtubule rearrangements during mitosis in multinucleate cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(3):254–263. doi: 10.1002/cm.970090307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asnes C. F., Schroeder T. E. Cell cleavage. Ultrastructural evidence against equatorial stimulation by aster microtubules. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Sep;122(2):327–338. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90309-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bray D., White J. G. Cortical flow in animal cells. Science. 1988 Feb 19;239(4842):883–888. doi: 10.1126/science.3277283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dabora S. L., Sheetz M. P. Cultured cell extracts support organelle movement on microtubules in vitro. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(4):482–495. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;104(1):9–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HIRAMOTO Y. Cell division without mitotic apparatus in sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Dec;11(3):630–636. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90171-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris A. K., Gewalt S. L. Simulation testing of mechanisms for inducing the formation of the contractile ring in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2215–2223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris P., Osborn M., Weber K. Distribution of tubulin-containing structures in the egg of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus from fertilization through first cleavage. J Cell Biol. 1980 Mar;84(3):668–679. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.3.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hyman A. A., White J. G. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2123–2135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ingold A. L., Cohn S. A., Scholey J. M. Inhibition of kinesin-driven microtubule motility by monoclonal antibodies to kinesin heavy chains. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 2):2657–2667. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobson K., Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karr T. L., Alberts B. M. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mazia D., Paweletz N., Sluder G., Finze E. M. Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):377–381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neighbors B. W., Williams R. C., Jr, McIntosh J. R. Localization of kinesin in cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1193–1204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paschal B. M., Shpetner H. S., Vallee R. B. MAP 1C is a microtubule-activated ATPase which translocates microtubules in vitro and has dynein-like properties. J Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;105(3):1273–1282. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. RAPPAPORT R., EBSTEIN R. P. DURATION OF STIMULUS AND LATENT PERIODS PRECEDING FURROW FORMATION IN SAND DOLLAR EGGS. J Exp Zool. 1965 Apr;158:373–382. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401580311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. RAPPAPORT R. Experiments concerning the cleavage stimulus in sand dollar eggs. J Exp Zool. 1961 Oct;148:81–89. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401480107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1971;31:169–213. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis: the effect of initial distance between mitotic apparatus and surface on the rate of subsequent cleavage furrow progress. J Exp Zool. 1982 Jul 1;221(3):399–403. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402210318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rappaport R. Establishment of the mechanism of cytokinesis in animal cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1986;105:245–281. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rappaport R., Rappaport B. N. Division of constricted and urethane-treated sand dollar eggs: a test of the polar stimulation hypothesis. J Exp Zool. 1984 Jul;231(1):81–92. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402310111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells. Nature. 1988 Apr 21;332(6166):724–726. doi: 10.1038/332724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sawada T., Schatten G. Microtubules in ascidian eggs during meiosis, fertilization, and mitosis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(3):219–230. doi: 10.1002/cm.970090304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saxton W. M., McIntosh J. R. Interzone microtubule behavior in late anaphase and telophase spindles. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):875–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schatten G., Simerly C., Asai D. J., Szöke E., Cooke P., Schatten H. Acetylated alpha-tubulin in microtubules during mouse fertilization and early development. Dev Biol. 1988 Nov;130(1):74–86. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90415-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schroeder T. E. Fourth cleavage of sea urchin blastomeres: microtubule patterns and myosin localization in equal and unequal cell divisions. Dev Biol. 1987 Nov;124(1):9–22. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90454-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sluder G., Begg D. A. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):877–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.3.877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spurck T. P., Pickett-Heaps J. D. On the mechanism of anaphase A: evidence that ATP is needed for microtubule disassembly and not generation of polewards force. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1691–1705. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Strome S., Hill D. P. Early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans: the cytoskeleton and spatial organization of the zygote. Bioessays. 1988 May;8(5):145–149. doi: 10.1002/bies.950080504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wadsworth P. Microinjected carboxylated beads move predominantly poleward in sea urchin eggs. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8(4):293–301. doi: 10.1002/cm.970080402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. White J. G., Borisy G. G. On the mechanisms of cytokinesis in animal cells. J Theor Biol. 1983 Mar 21;101(2):289–316. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90342-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES