Summary
The transition from G1 into DNA replication (S phase) is an emergent behavior resulting from dynamic and complex interactions between cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), Cdk inhibitors (CKIs), and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Understanding the cellular decision to commit to S phase requires a quantitative description of these interactions. We apply quantitative imaging of single human cells to track the expression of G1/S regulators and use these data to parametrize a stochastic mathematical model of the G1/S transition. We show that a rapid, proteolytic, double-negative feedback loop between Cdk2:Cyclin and the Cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 drives a switch-like entry into S phase. Furthermore, our model predicts that increasing Emi1 levels throughout S phase are critical in maintaining irreversibility of the G1/S transition, which we validate using Emi1 knockdown and live imaging of G1/S reporters. This work provides insight into the general design principles of the signaling networks governing the temporally abrupt transitions between cell-cycle phases.
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
-
•
A model of the human G1/S transition is derived from single-cell imaging of key regulators
-
•
Double-negative feedback between Cdk2:CycE and p27 drives a switch-like transition
-
•
The APC/C inhibitor Emi1 ensures that the G1/S transition is kept irreversible
-
•
Modeling provides insight into the differences in Cdk2 activity between cancer and normal cells
The principles underlying switch-like and irreversible transitions between cell-cycle phases are poorly understood in mammalian cells. Barr et al. have used quantitative real-time imaging of regulators of the G1-to-S transition in single human cells to develop a mechanistic model to show how this network drives rapid and irreversible commitment to cell-cycle progression.
Introduction
Through decades of painstaking genetic and biochemical research, the components regulating cell-cycle progression have been identified, but how these components dynamically interact to drive this progression in either normal or cancerous human cells is poorly understood. In mammalian cells, the decision to enter the cell cycle is made at the restriction point, which is analogous to the Start transition in yeast (Johnson and Skotheim, 2013, Zetterberg et al., 1995). Restriction point/Start is followed by a separate G1/S transition where the cell becomes committed to DNA replication. In yeast, Start is characterized by a transcriptional burst that leads to the accumulation of G1- and S-phase cyclins (Clns and Clbs, respectively). This transcriptional activation is driven by a positive feedback loop (Skotheim et al., 2008) that makes Start an irreversible transition (Charvin et al., 2010). The accumulation of S-phase cyclins is necessary, but not sufficient, to initiate DNA replication because the activity of Cdk1:Clb complexes is initially masked by their stoichiometric inhibitor, the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor (CKI) Sic1 (Schwob et al., 1994); note that the colon indicates that Cdk1 and Clb are in a protein complex. The G1/S transition is triggered by the proteolytic degradation of Sic1. Sic1 degradation is initiated by Cln:Cdk1 activity (Nash et al., 2001) and continues to be rapidly degraded by the Clb:Cdk1 kinases as they become activated (Kõivomägi et al., 2011, Yang et al., 2013).
A transcriptional positive-feedback loop similar to the Start network in yeasts operates at the restriction point in mammalian cells (Bertoli et al., 2013, Cross et al., 2011). CyclinE:Cdk2 promotes CyclinE transcription through activation of its transcription factor (E2F) (Geng et al., 1996, Ohtani et al., 1995, Weinberg, 1995). A bistable switch generated by transcriptional feedback makes the transition through the restriction point irreversible (Yao et al., 2008). Following the transition past the restriction point, E2F-mediated transcription leads to the accumulation of both CyclinE and CyclinA, which form complexes with Cdk2, resulting in its activation, which serves as the trigger for S-phase entry. Similar to yeast, activation of Cdk2:S-phase Cyclin complexes requires the proteolytic degradation of their stoichiometric CKIs, p27Kip1, and p21Cip1 (Sherr and Roberts, 1999).
The proteolytic double-negative feedback between CKI and S-phase kinases in yeast leads to G1 and S being two discrete, alternative states. Furthermore, this double-negative feedback loop ensures that commitment to S phase in yeast is irreversible (Chen et al., 2000, Cross et al., 2002, Verdugo et al., 2013, Yang et al., 2013). While the core regulatory machinery (i.e., the proteolytic double-negative feedback loop) of the G1/S transition is conserved between yeast and man, this machinery has been extensively elaborated upon. This elaboration is in the form of many more regulatory components (Cyclins, CDKs, CKIs), with sometimes partially overlapping functions, and additional interactions between conserved components (Cross et al., 2011). Thus, an unresolved question is whether the mammalian G1/S transition exhibits similar system-level properties as yeast. Answering this question is important not only to gain insight into the mammalian G1/S transition, but also to understand how particular behaviors observed in yeast, such as the irreversible switching between discrete states, can be retained when the size and complexity of the regulatory networks governing these behaviors increase during evolution.
Describing the systems-level interactions between Cdk2, CyclinE, CyclinA, and CKI is also highly relevant to gaining insight into the dysregulated G1/S progression of cancer cells, where mutations and epigenetic events often conspire to increase CyclinE and downregulate p27Kip1 levels (Chu et al., 2008, Fero et al., 1996, Hershko, 2010, Kiyokawa et al., 1996, Nakayama et al., 1996, Scaltriti et al., 2011). Moreover, many cancer cells do not have an intact restriction point (Asghar et al., 2015), and thus, inhibition of the G1/S transition is an attractive therapeutic target to stop these cancer cells from proliferating. To inhibit S-phase entry effectively, we need a quantitative understanding of how Cdk2 activity is a function of Cyclins, CKIs, and APC/C components and how this drives cell-cycle progression.
Only a handful of studies have been able to describe the systems-level logic of progression through different cell-cycle phases in mammalian cells (Pomerening et al., 2008, Yao et al., 2008, Yuan et al., 2014), likely because it has been difficult to quantify the levels and/or activity of different network components at a single cell level. Single cell, time-lapse data are essential to generate predictive quantitative models because such models require information not only on the signaling state of a cell at a given time, but also regarding the cell’s history, which is unattainable using population-based measurements.
Here we describe an experimental system to quantify the real-time protein expression of key regulatory molecules involved in the G1/S transition (CyclinA2, CyclinE1, and p27Kip1) and Cdk2 activity. We correlate these changes with cellular fate (initiation of DNA replication) in single proliferating cells. We chose to use HeLa cells as they are an excellent model for studying dysregulated G1/S progression as like almost all cancer cells, they have lost the function of pRb (an inhibitor of E2F), do not have an intact restriction point, and enter G1/S directly after cell division (Moody and Laimins, 2010, Schwarz et al., 1985). We used single cell imaging data of protein levels throughout the G1/S transition to construct a mathematical model of this transition. This work reveals that a switch-like G1/S transition is driven by the mutual antagonism between Cdk2 and p27Kip1. Furthermore, our model provides a mechanistic explanation for how Emi1 keeps the G1/S transition irreversible to prevent DNA re-replication.
Results
Establishing a System to Analyze the Dynamics of the G1/S Transition in Human Cancer Cells
We first sought to follow the dynamics of Cyclin and p27Kip1 expression in HeLa cells at the G1/S transition. We genetically modified bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs; Ciotta et al., 2011, Hutchins et al., 2010) to generate GFP-tagged p27Kip1, CyclinE1, and CyclinA2, under the control of their endogenous promoters. These constructs were used to generate clonal cell lines for this study (Figure S1A). Expression of all three reporters mimicked the localization and expression of their endogenous counterparts (Figures 1 and S1B–S1D), indicating that the GFP tag did not affect their cell-cycle-mediated regulation. Moreover, the GFP tag did not prevent S-phase entry or cell-cycle progression (Figures S1E and S1F) and did not affect protein degradation rates (Figures S1G and S1H; timely degradation of CyclinA2-GFP has been validated in den Elzen and Pines, 2001). Thus, our system accurately reflects Cyclin and p27Kip1 expression throughout the G1/S transition.
To correlate Cyclin and CKI expression with the G1/S transition, we co-imaged each GFP tagged protein with LSS2-mKate-PCNA (Figures 1, S1C, and S1D; Movies S1, S2, and S3). Fluorescently labeled PCNA is a robust and well-used marker of DNA replication in mammalian cells (Essers et al., 2005, Held et al., 2010, Leonhardt et al., 2000, Pomerening et al., 2008) and does not interfere with cell-cycle progression in our system. When cells enter S phase, PCNA fluorescence rapidly increases and then switches to a punctate localization (Figures 1A–1D, S1C, and S1D). Since the duration of G1 varies between cells, LSS2-mKate-PCNA localization can act as a marker to pseudo-synchronize cells at the G1/S transition, which we define as time zero (Figures 1A–1C).
We next sought to define the temporal regulation of each of the GFP tagged G1/S regulators throughout the G1/S transition. Consistent with previous observations made in HeLa cell populations by western blotting (Carrano et al., 1999), we found that p27Kip1-GFP is absent after cell division, accumulates rapidly, and is then degraded, starting approximately 5–10 hr after mitotic exit (Figure S1D). Through live single cell imaging, we observed a decelerating pattern of p27Kip1-GFP accumulation during G1 that strongly suggests that p27Kip1 degradation is turned off after cell division. By imaging p27Kip1-GFP and LSS2-mKate PCNA in the same cell, we saw that p27Kip1-GFP was very rapidly degraded immediately prior to S-phase entry (Figures 1A and S1D). Western blotting of synchronized cell lysates did not show this rapid degradation because in a cell population cells enter S phase at different rates (Figure S1G), and thus, p27Kip1 degradation appears slow.
We observed that CyclinE1-GFP accumulates prior to the G1/S transition and is only degraded after S-phase entry (Figure 1B), consistent with previous reports of CyclinE levels in HeLa cell populations determined by western blotting of lysates from synchronized cells (Dulić et al., 1992, Koff et al., 1992). Single cell imaging also revealed that CyclinE1-GFP levels reach a short plateau immediately after S-phase entry, consistent with the plateau reached by endogenous CyclinE as detected by western blotting (Yuan et al., 2014). Moreover, accumulation of CyclinE1-GFP occurred in an accelerated fashion.
In contrast to CyclinE1-GFP, CyclinA2-GFP remained low during G1, despite the fact that their common transcription factor (E2F) was active during G1 (Figure 1C). Imaging of CyclinA2-GFP showed that CyclinA2 protein only began to accumulate in a linear manner after the G1/S transition (Figure 1C), consistent with previous reports from western blotting of HeLa cell lysates (Pines and Hunter, 1990). This suggests that CyclinA2 is degraded during G1.
Notably, the levels of CyclinE and CyclinA alone do not reveal Cdk2 activity since Cyclin binding alone is not necessarily sufficient to activate Cdks (reviewed in Morgan, 1997). To measure Cdk2 activity, we generated a Cdk2 activity sensor (CDK2L-GFP), a slightly longer version of the recently published DHB-Ven Cdk2 sensor (see Experimental Procedures; Gu et al., 2004, Spencer et al., 2013). Briefly, this is a fluorescent sensor of Cdk2 activity based on the C-terminal fragment of DNA Helicase B. When phosphorylated by Cdk2, the sensor leaves the nucleus. By measuring the cytoplasmic:nuclear ratio of CDK2L-GFP, we can obtain an estimate of Cdk2 kinase activity from individual cells. First, we validated that CDK2L-GFP was a specific reporter of Cdk2 activity in HeLa cells (Figures S2A–S2I). As judged by our CDK2L-GFP sensor, Cdk2 kinase activity abruptly increased at S-phase entry, followed by a second phase of activity increase that occurs at a relatively slower rate (Figure 1D; Movie S4). We saw similar behavior if we used the DHB-Ven Cdk2 activity sensor (Spencer et al., 2013) in HeLa cells (Figure S2J). The abrupt increase in kinase activity was precisely correlated with the rapid decrease in p27Kip1-GFP (Figures 1A and 1D), suggesting that degradation of p27Kip1 may be rate limiting in Cdk2 activation and S-phase entry. Immediately after S-phase entry, we consistently observed a transient decrease in Cdk2 activity (Figures 1D and S2J). In CyclinE1/2-depleted cells, this decrease is more pronounced (Figure 3D). However, what causes this dip in Cdk2 activity is currently not known and warrants further investigation. Taken together, these observations describe key G1/S signaling events in single cells throughout the G1/S transition.
Developing a Dynamical Model of the G1/S Transition
To understand how the observed dynamics of Cyclin, CKI and Cdk2 activity emerge from the underlying molecular network, we next generated a dynamical model of the G1/S transition in human cells based on our live imaging data. Until now, the dynamical data necessary to parametrize such a model have not been available, as the current literature provides information only on the molecular mechanisms controlling the G1/S transition (Kohn, 1999). This G1/S molecular network involves multiple interactions between Cdk2:CyclinA, Cdk2:CyclinE, p27Kip1, and their regulators (Figure 2A).
We have used prior knowledge of the G1/S molecular network to construct a stochastic mathematical model of the G1/S transition (see Supplemental Information for a detailed description of rate expressions). Our model contains a considerable number of kinetic parameters (25) that are largely unknown in the current literature, except for the half-lives of some mRNAs and proteins (Schwanhäusser et al., 2011). The unknown rate constants were estimated by comparing deterministic simulations of the model (Figure 2C) with averaged time courses of pseudo-synchronized cell-cycle regulators (Figures 2B and S3A) in a brute-force approach.
In our model, active E2F leads to an accumulation of CyclinE protein early in G1 (Figures 2C and S3B), in the absence of functional pRb in HeLa cells (Moody and Laimins, 2010, Schwarz et al., 1985). However, CyclinE accumulation is insufficient to drive progression into S phase as Cdk2:CyclinE activity is inhibited by its stoichiometric CKI, p27Kip1, whose degradation, dependent on Cdk2 and SCFSkp2 activities (Sheaff et al., 1997), is slow at low Cdk2 activity and low Skp2 levels. Once sufficient CyclinE accumulates, Cdk2:CyclinE activity overcomes p27Kip1 inhibition. The activated Cdk2:CyclinE targets p27Kip1 for proteasome-dependent degradation through phosphorylation of T187 on p27Kip1 (Müller et al., 1997, Sheaff et al., 1997, Vlach et al., 1997). With the degradation of p27Kip1, more Cdk2:CyclinE is released, and p27Kip1 degradation is further enhanced. The fast positive feedback results in the abrupt degradation of p27Kip1. After the abrupt degradation of p27Kip1, Cdk2:CyclinE kinase becomes activated (Figures 2C and S3B).
In our model, despite the activation of CyclinA protein synthesis, the level of CyclinA is kept low in G1 phase by APC/CCdh1-mediated degradation (Figures 2C and S3B; Geley et al., 2001, Lukas et al., 1999, Sørensen et al., 2001). Accumulation of CyclinA does not start until inactivation of APC/CCdh1. At the end of G1, APC/CCdh1 is inactivated due to the accumulation of Emi1 (Hsu et al., 2002, Miller et al., 2006) and phosphorylation of Cdh1 by Cdk2 (Keck et al., 2007, Lukas et al., 1999). This leads to accumulation of Skp2 (Bashir et al., 2004, Wei et al., 2004). The degradation of phosphorylated p27Kip1, which is dependent on SCFSkp2-dependent poly-ubiquitylation, is further accelerated by Skp2 accumulation in late G1 (Figure S3C).
All of these events—p27Kip1 degradation, Cdk2 activation, and CyclinA accumulation—coincide with the G1/S transition. This leads to the phosphorylation-dependent degradation of CyclinE protein by Cdk2 (Won and Reed, 1996). A linear combination of the model-calculated free Cdk2:Cyclin complexes (Figure 2C) therefore approximates the Cdk2 activity, as measured by our Cdk2 sensor (Figure 2B).
Our model explains the switch-like characteristic of the G1/S transition by mutual inhibition among cell-cycle regulators, with a central role for p27Kip1. The abrupt degradation of p27Kip1 has a critical threshold and fast protein turnover requirement. In our model, the threshold originates from the antagonistic interaction between p27Kip1 and Cdk2:Cyclin complexes, which creates a bistable switch with the following characteristics. (1) The steady-state level of p27Kip1 can be either high or low depending on CyclinE levels, but intermediate steady-state levels are unstable (Figure 2D). (2) The transition from a high to low p27Kip1 level takes place at a higher threshold of CyclinE than the opposite transition. Therefore, G1/S control possesses the property of hysteresis. (3) The threshold of CyclinE at which transitions occur is dependent on the levels of Emi1 that inhibit APC/CCdh1 and thereby upregulate Skp2 (Figure 2D). At the beginning of the cycle when both CyclinE and Emi1 levels are low, the thresholds are high, p27Kip1 is attracted to the upper steady state, and its level rises (red curve in Figure 2D). (4) During G1, E2F-dependent transcription drives the increase in both CyclinE and Emi1 protein levels. Thus, CyclinE and Emi1 could act synergistically to remove p27Kip1. CyclinE levels reach the upper threshold at a relatively low level of Emi1 that drives the cell through G1/S into a state of low p27Kip1 (Figure S3D). (5) After the G1/S transition, CyclinE levels start to decrease, but the cell stays in the low p27Kip1 regime because the thresholds are also decreasing through Emi1 accumulation (Figure S3D). The continuous decrease of the thresholds makes G1/S an irreversible transition in the model.
Critically, our stochastic model captures the observed dynamics of G1/S regulators in HeLa cells (compare Figure S3A with S3B) and thus provides a suitable framework by which to make novel predictions regarding the mechanisms that underlie the dynamical nature of the G1/S transition.
Degradation of p27Kip1 Is Driven by Cdk2 Activity
Our model of the G1/S regulatory network attributes the abrupt decrease of p27Kip1 to fast protein turnover regulated by direct and indirect double-negative feedback loops between p27Kip1 and Cdk2. Specifically, activated Cdk2 promotes p27Kip1 degradation. Our model also implies that Cdk2 is required to keep the level of p27Kip1 low after G1/S. Inhibition of Cdk2 should lead to re-accumulation of p27Kip1 (Figure S3E). To test this prediction, we treated HeLa cells, arrested in early S phase by a thymidine block, with a Cdk1/2 inhibitor. In S-phase-arrested cells, p27Kip1 levels are negligible. However, upon addition of Cdk1/2 inhibitor, p27Kip1 rapidly re-accumulated (Figure S3F). This rapid re-accumulation of p27Kip1 suggests that its synthesis (transcription and translation) is still active during DNA replication. Moreover, the low level of p27Kip1 after G1/S transition is indeed maintained by high Cdk2 activity promoting p27Kip1 degradation. Therefore, our model correctly predicts that a low level of p27Kip1 is maintained throughout S phase by high Cdk activity.
CyclinE Controls the Timing of the G1/S Transition
Stochastic model simulation with reduced levels of residual CyclinE synthesis suggests that the G1/S transition is delayed if CyclinE levels are depleted in G1 (compare the red and gray p27Kip1 curves on Figure 3A). However, the rapid degradation of p27Kip1 and the abrupt activation of Cdk2 are conserved even after CyclinE depletion. The abruptness of p27Kip1 degradation in the absence of CyclinE can be attributed to the mutual antagonism between Cdk2:CyclinA and its inhibitor p27Kip1 (Figure 2A). The steady-state level of p27Kip1 shows a similar Z-shaped dependence on the levels of CyclinA (not shown). The two CyclinA thresholds, where p27Kip1 decreases or rises, are Emi1 dependent because Emi1 inhibits APC/CCdh1 to upregulate Skp2 levels (Figure 3B). The model predicts that the “path” during the G1/S transition is different for control siRNA-treated cells (Figure S3D) and CyclinE-depleted cells (Figure 3B). In control siRNA cells, CyclinE and Emi1 accumulate simultaneously. Since Emi1 is low, APC/CCdh1 is largely active, and Skp2 level is low. Therefore, a large amount of CyclinE is needed (>0.6 arbitrary units [a.u.]) to trigger p27Kip1 degradation. In CyclinE-depleted cells, Emi1 accumulates first, leading to APC/CCdh1 inactivation and subsequent accumulation of CyclinA. In the presence of a high level of Emi1, inactive APC/CCdh1 and a high level of Skp2, a low level of CyclinA (approximately 0.2 a.u.) is sufficient to trigger p27Kip1 degradation.
Consistent with our model prediction, siRNA-mediated depletion of CyclinE delayed the degradation of p27Kip1, activation of Cdk2, and initiation of S phase (compare the gray with the red and black curves on Figures 3C and 3D, respectively; see also Figures S4A and S4B). In addition, the abrupt degradation of p27Kip1 and abrupt activation of Cdk2 remained intact after CyclinE depletion (Figures 3C and 3D). Together, our results suggest that although CyclinE is dispensable for the initiation of DNA replication (Geng et al., 2003) CyclinE does play a role in the timing the G1/S transition and thus is rate limiting.
CyclinA Is Dispensable for the Timing of G1/S Transition
Stochastic model simulation with reduced levels of CyclinA suggests no change in the timing of the G1/S transition (compare the red and gray p27 curves on Figure 4A). In addition, the simulation suggested that neither p27Kip1 degradation nor Cdk2 activation showed any delay relative to control cells and that these events also kept their close association with the G1/S transition. These simulation results are consistent with our experimental testing, in which CyclinA is depleted by siRNA (compare the gray with the red and black curves on Figures 4B and 4C, respectively; see also Figures S4A and S4C).
Since CyclinA does not control the timing of the G1/S transition, the observation that different cells enter S phase at different times is unlikely due to their different levels of CyclinA. Based on our stochastic simulations (Figure 4A), we predict that the stochastic expression of other G1/S regulators (for example CyclinE or Emi1) is responsible for the variability in timing of the G1/S transition in CyclinA-deficient cells.
Emi1 Ensures an Irreversible G1/S Transition
One way to ensure that DNA is replicated once and only once per cell cycle is to make the G1/S transition difficult to reverse. Intuitively, we might predict that by binding and activating Cdk2 CyclinA could maintain an S-phase state after CyclinE is degraded. However, our model simulations predict that CyclinA depletion in S-phase cells is not sufficient to trigger re-accumulation of p27Kip1 and thus reset cells into G1. In contrast, our model suggests that Emi1 is both necessary and sufficient to maintain the post-G1 state. Specifically, our model predicts that increasing levels of Emi1 during S phase decrease the amount of CyclinE required to maintain p27Kip1 degradation (Figures 2D and S3D). If we remove Emi1 from S-phase cells in the model, APC/CCdh1 is activated, CyclinA and Skp2 are degraded, and p27Kip1 and CyclinE re-accumulate. Later, increasing CyclinE causes a second round of p27Kip1 degradation, and the cells could re-enter S phase once again (Figures 5A and S5A).
To test our model prediction, we synchronized cells in early S phase (with a double thymidine block) and depleted Emi1 by RNA interference during release from the first thymidine block, such that Emi1 would be depleted in the next cell cycle (Figure S5B; see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Control siRNA-treated cells undergo mitotic cycling, confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Figure 5B) and the temporal patterns of cell-cycle regulators (see Figures S5C–S5F). In contrast, Emi1 depletion leads to re-replication of DNA, as previously reported (Figure 5B; Di Fiore and Pines, 2007, Machida and Dutta, 2007). This suggests that Emi1 is required to maintain an irreversible G1/S transition.
Consistent with our model prediction, the experimental data clearly show a short-lived increase then degradation of CyclinA2-GFP (Figure 5C), followed by transient accumulation of p27Kip1-GFP (Figure 5D), and re-accumulation of CyclinE1-GFP (Figure 5E). This accumulation of CyclinE1 protein is likely due to a combination of a low level of Cdk2 activity since CyclinE1-GFP is stabilized when Cdk2 activity is inhibited (Figure S6A) and high E2F activity as cells return to a G1-like state. Direct measurements of Cdk2 activity in Emi1-depleted cells show an initial small increase in kinase activity after release from the thymidine block, followed by a decrease. In the majority of cells, this decrease is small and is followed by a plateau in Cdk2 levels at an intermediate level of between 1 and 1.5 (Figure 5F). However, in some cells, this dip in Cdk2 activity is more pronounced. The activity of Cdk2 in any individual Emi1-depleted cell will depend on (1) the level of Emi1 depletion and (2) the relative amounts of CyclinE and CyclinA when Emi1 is depleted in that cell. Therefore, cells with a larger dip in Cdk2 activity may reflect cells with a better Emi1 depletion and/or a higher ratio of CyclinA to CyclinE when Emi1 is depleted.
This begs the question of how DNA re-replicates after Emi1 depletion. Notably, we do not observe endoreduplication after Emi1 depletion (Figure 5B; no discrete peak is seen at 8n; at 200K on the x axis). If we image PCNA dynamics in cells depleted of Emi1, we can observe nuclei switching between G1 and S in the absence of mitosis and nuclei increasing in size (Figure S6B; Movies S5 and S6). However, PCNA foci in Emi1-depleted cells are not discrete, as in control siRNA-treated cells, and S-phase entry is more noticeable by changes in the “texture” of PCNA localization throughout the nucleus (Movie S6). This implies that after Emi1 depletion, cells do not progress through “early,” “mid,” and “late” DNA replication stages, but instead likely sit at the boundary of G1 and S, refiring some DNA replication origins. Loss of Geminin after Emi1 depletion (Di Fiore and Pines, 2007, Machida and Dutta, 2007) would permit origin refiring. This is also consistent with recent data suggesting uncontrolled reactivation of replication origins after Emi1 depletion (Neelsen et al., 2013). Altogether, our data suggest that S-phase cells depleted of Emi1 can transiently return to a G1 state (low CyclinA, high p27Kip1, accumulating CyclinE) before recommitting to DNA synthesis, supporting our model prediction that Emi1 maintains the irreversibility of the G1/S transition.
Discussion
Our model suggests that the abrupt degradation of p27Kip1 is the result of a rapid proteolytic double-negative feedback loop between Cdk2:CyclinE and p27Kip1. This fast degradation of p27Kip1 ensures a rapid activation of Cdk2 and immediate S-phase entry. We propose that p27Kip1 degradation is rate limiting in S-phase entry in HeLa cells. Indeed, this is consistent with previous reports using siRNA to deplete p27Kip1 (Sabile et al., 2006, Yuan et al., 2014). Thus, even though the proteolytic double-negative feedback loop between a Cdk:Cyclin complex and a CKI is embedded within a more complex architecture in HeLa cells than in yeast, it is sufficient to explain the temporally abrupt switching between two discrete cell-cycle states.
While the feedback between Cdk2:CyclinE and p27Kip1 is sufficient to explain the switch-like transition between G1 and S phases, our model predicts that the transition is made globally irreversible by Emi1 accumulation. In support of this, we observe that single S-phase cells depleted of Emi1 re-express p27Kip1, accumulate CyclinE, degrade CyclinA, and appear to engage in simultaneous licensing and firing of replication origins, which are normally temporally distinct behaviors (Figure 5B). It is also formally possible that Emi1-depleted cells are activating a checkpoint that leads to the stabilization of p27Kip1. However, since p27Kip1 expression is not sustained in the presence of continuous Emi1 depletion and we observe DNA re-replication, we do not think that this is the case.
In marked contrast to MCF10A and fibroblast cell lines, where populations exhibit heterogeneous Cdk2 dynamics and exist in either Cdk2high or Cdk2low states (Spencer et al., 2013), HeLa cells are homogeneous in terms of their pattern of Cdk2 activity. HeLa cells lack restriction point control due to expression of E6 and E7 proteins from integrated HPV-18, which inactivate p53 and pRb, respectively (Boshart et al., 1984, Butz et al., 1995) and also overexpress c-Myc (Dürst et al., 1987, Lazo et al., 1989). By extending our model to include pRb control over E2F activity, the differences between HeLa versus MCF10A and fibroblast cell lines can be explained. This suggests that the model may be generalizable to explain some of the differences between cancer and non-transformed cells. In non-transformed cells growing in the presence of intermediate levels of mitogens, the decision between proliferation and G1 arrest is made at the end of the previous cycle (Overton et al., 2014, Spencer et al., 2013). pRb phosphorylation by E2F-induced Cdk2:Cyclin complexes creates additional amplification loops within the network (Figure 6A), with low and high Cdk2:CyclinE activity states (Figure 6B). Whether dividing cells adopt a Cdk2high or Cdk2low fate depends on the mutual antagonism between CKIs and the residual Cdk activity after degradation of CyclinA and CyclinB during mitosis. Cdk2:CyclinE activity is the most significant in this context, and if it is high relative to CKI-mediated inhibition, cells progress into S phase (Figure 6C). In the opposite scenario, high CKI and low Cdk2:CyclinE activity leads to pRb-dephosphorylation, E2F inactivation, and G1 arrest (Figure 6D).
Perhaps because HeLa cells lack functional pRb, they exist in a single signaling state that leads to S-phase commitment in all cells. We suggest that this homogeneity may be an important aspect in oncogenesis, as the lack of bifurcation into CDKhigh or CDKlow states would ensure that the majority of cells in a tumor have a high probability of proliferating, resulting in increased tumor fitness. In contrast, if a subpopulation of a tumor frequently entered a CDK2low state, this would decrease the fitness of the population as a whole. However, evolving homogeneity in S-phase commitment during oncogenesis may come at a price, as the signaling networks regulating the G1/S transition exist in a single (attractor) region in signaling state space and thus are less robust to inhibition of components necessary for that state. Homogeneity in the signaling state of the G1/S network across cancer cells may explain the somewhat counterintuitive observations that some cancer cells are more dependent on key cell-cycle regulators, such as Cdk2 and CyclinE, than non-transformed cells (Martín et al., 2005, Tetsu and McCormick, 2003, van den Heuvel and Harlow, 1993).
In future studies, it will be important to determine whether the systems that regulate G1/S are similar in other cancer cell models that lack restriction point control in order to gain mechanistic insight into cell-cycle regulation. Ultimately, different patients may be stratified not only on the basis of genotypic differences, but also on predicted differences in both the architecture and dynamics of their regulatory networks.
Experimental Procedures
Generation of Fluorescently Tagged BACs and Reporters
BACs used in this study were ordered from BACPAC Resource center (CHORI). BACs used are p27Kip1 RP11-70N14, CCNE1 RP11-345J21, and CCNA2 RP11-768B18. All BACs were verified by PCR using verification primers as listed on the Mitocheck website (http://www.mitocheck.org). Proteins of interest were tagged using BAC Recombineering at their C-termini with localization and affinity purification (LAP) tags that contain GFP and an affinity purification tag (Poser et al., 2008). Primers used to tag BACs were those listed on the Mitocheck BACFinder website (http://www.mitocheck.org/cgi-bin/BACfinder). Successful recombination and tagging of genes was confirmed by PCR followed by DNA sequencing.
PCNA was tagged at the N terminus with the modified LSS2-mKate fluorophore to generate LSS2-mKate-PCNA (Piatkevich et al., 2010).
To measure CDK2 activity, we used a similar strategy, now described in Spencer et al. (2013). We cloned the C-terminal PSLD region of Human DNA Helicase B (DHB; 957-1087 amino acids of DHB) into pIRES-GFP Puro3 to generate CDK2L-GFP. Note that this sensor is slightly longer than that used in Spencer et al. and is similar to the one first described in Gu et al. (2004).
Live Cell Imaging
Live cell imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal, with a 40× oil objective, NA 1.3, or a High-content Opera Spinning disk confocal microscope (PerkinElmer), with a 40× water objective, NA 0.9. All live cell imaging was carried out in a humidified environmental chamber maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Quantification of Reporters
All imaging data was quantified in Volocity (PerkinElmer). To find dynamic changes in GFP intensities, cell nuclei were tracked using the LSS2-mKate-PCNA signal and the Shortest Path algorithm. A maximum distance of 9 μm between nuclei in consecutive timeframes was used to eliminate erroneous tracks. For p27Kip1-GFP, CyclinE1-GFP, and CyclinA2-GFP, nuclear levels of protein were quantified since all three proteins had an exclusively nuclear localization during G1 and S. In each cell, the average value of pixel intensities was calculated, and average background fluorescence was subtracted. All fluorescence intensities were normalized to peak levels. Timing of S-phase entry was determined manually from PCNA fluorescence images. Specifically, S-phase entry is defined by a sharp increase in PCNA intensity, often coinciding with the appearance of nucleoli.
For CDK2L-GFP and DHB-Ven quantification, nuclear intensity was measured by taking a region of interest (ROI) inside the nucleus, and cytoplasmic intensity was measured as the ring region around the nucleus. Cdk2 activity was then measured as the ratio between the ring GFP intensity to the nuclear GFP intensity.
Additional experimental procedures are provided in Supplemental Information.
Author Contributions
A.R.B. designed and performed experiments. A.R.B., F.S.H., T.Z., C.B., and B.N. analyzed the data. T.Z., F.S.H., and B.N. created the mathematical model. A.R.B., F.S.H., T.Z., C.B., and B.N. wrote the paper.
Acknowledgments
We thank Faraz Mardakheh and Rebecca Wilson for technical help. We thank Francis Barr and Jonathon Pines for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Ellen Fanning (Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center), Cristina Cardoso (Technische Universitat), Vladislav Verkhusha (Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Tobias Meyer (Stanford University), and Spiros Linardopoulos (Institute of Cancer Research) for reagents. The groups of C.B. and B.N. are supported by BBSRC Strategic LoLa grant (BB/MM00354X/1).
Published: January 27, 2016
Footnotes
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures, six figures, and six movies and can be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.01.001.
Contributor Information
Chris Bakal, Email: chris.bakal@icr.ac.uk.
Béla Novák, Email: bela.novak@bioch.ox.ac.uk.
Supplemental Information
References
- Asghar U., Witkiewicz A.K., Turner N.C., Knudsen E.S. The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;14:130–146. doi: 10.1038/nrd4504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashir T., Dorrello N.V., Amador V., Guardavaccaro D., Pagano M. Control of the SCF(Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin ligase by the APC/C(Cdh1) ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 2004;428:190–193. doi: 10.1038/nature02330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertoli C., Skotheim J.M., de Bruin R.A. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:518–528. doi: 10.1038/nrm3629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boshart M., Gissmann L., Ikenberg H., Kleinheinz A., Scheurlen W., zur Hausen H. A new type of papillomavirus DNA, its presence in genital cancer biopsies and in cell lines derived from cervical cancer. EMBO J. 1984;3:1151–1157. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01944.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butz K., Shahabeddin L., Geisen C., Spitkovsky D., Ullmann A., Hoppe-Seyler F. Functional p53 protein in human papillomavirus-positive cancer cells. Oncogene. 1995;10:927–936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carrano A.C., Eytan E., Hershko A., Pagano M. SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:193–199. doi: 10.1038/12013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charvin G., Oikonomou C., Siggia E.D., Cross F.R. Origin of irreversibility of cell cycle start in budding yeast. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen K.C., Csikasz-Nagy A., Gyorffy B., Val J., Novak B., Tyson J.J. Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000;11:369–391. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.1.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chu I.M., Hengst L., Slingerland J.M. The Cdk inhibitor p27 in human cancer: prognostic potential and relevance to anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:253–267. doi: 10.1038/nrc2347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciotta G., Hofemeister H., Maresca M., Fu J., Sarov M., Anastassiadis K., Stewart A.F. Recombineering BAC transgenes for protein tagging. Methods. 2011;53:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross F.R., Archambault V., Miller M., Klovstad M. Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2002;13:52–70. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-05-0265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross F.R., Buchler N.E., Skotheim J.M. Evolution of networks and sequences in eukaryotic cell cycle control. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011;366:3532–3544. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- den Elzen N., Pines J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:121–136. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Fiore B., Pines J. Emi1 is needed to couple DNA replication with mitosis but does not regulate activation of the mitotic APC/C. J. Cell Biol. 2007;177:425–437. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dulić V., Lees E., Reed S.I. Association of human cyclin E with a periodic G1-S phase protein kinase. Science. 1992;257:1958–1961. doi: 10.1126/science.1329201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dürst M., Croce C.M., Gissmann L., Schwarz E., Huebner K. Papillomavirus sequences integrate near cellular oncogenes in some cervical carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:1070–1074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.4.1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essers J., Theil A.F., Baldeyron C., van Cappellen W.A., Houtsmuller A.B., Kanaar R., Vermeulen W. Nuclear dynamics of PCNA in DNA replication and repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:9350–9359. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9350-9359.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fero M.L., Rivkin M., Tasch M., Porter P., Carow C.E., Firpo E., Polyak K., Tsai L.H., Broudy V., Perlmutter R.M. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27(Kip1)-deficient mice. Cell. 1996;85:733–744. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geley S., Kramer E., Gieffers C., Gannon J., Peters J.M., Hunt T. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:137–148. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geng Y., Eaton E.N., Picón M., Roberts J.M., Lundberg A.S., Gifford A., Sardet C., Weinberg R.A. Regulation of cyclin E transcription by E2Fs and retinoblastoma protein. Oncogene. 1996;12:1173–1180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geng Y., Yu Q., Sicinska E., Das M., Schneider J.E., Bhattacharya S., Rideout W.M., Bronson R.T., Gardner H., Sicinski P. Cyclin E ablation in the mouse. Cell. 2003;114:431–443. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00645-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu J., Xia X., Yan P., Liu H., Podust V.N., Reynolds A.B., Fanning E. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of a human DNA helicase that localizes in DNA damage foci. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:3320–3332. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Held M., Schmitz M.H., Fischer B., Walter T., Neumann B., Olma M.H., Peter M., Ellenberg J., Gerlich D.W. CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:747–754. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hershko D.D. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 as a prognostic biomarker and potential cancer therapeutic target. Future Oncol. 2010;6:1837–1847. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu J.Y., Reimann J.D., Sørensen C.S., Lukas J., Jackson P.K. E2F-dependent accumulation of hEmi1 regulates S phase entry by inhibiting APC(Cdh1) Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:358–366. doi: 10.1038/ncb785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchins J.R., Toyoda Y., Hegemann B., Poser I., Hériché J.K., Sykora M.M., Augsburg M., Hudecz O., Buschhorn B.A., Bulkescher J. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science. 2010;328:593–599. doi: 10.1126/science.1181348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson A., Skotheim J.M. Start and the restriction point. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013;25:717–723. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keck J.M., Summers M.K., Tedesco D., Ekholm-Reed S., Chuang L.C., Jackson P.K., Reed S.I. Cyclin E overexpression impairs progression through mitosis by inhibiting APC(Cdh1) J. Cell Biol. 2007;178:371–385. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiyokawa H., Kineman R.D., Manova-Todorova K.O., Soares V.C., Hoffman E.S., Ono M., Khanam D., Hayday A.C., Frohman L.A., Koff A. Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27(Kip1) Cell. 1996;85:721–732. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koff A., Giordano A., Desai D., Yamashita K., Harper J.W., Elledge S., Nishimoto T., Morgan D.O., Franza B.R., Roberts J.M. Formation and activation of a cyclin E-cdk2 complex during the G1 phase of the human cell cycle. Science. 1992;257:1689–1694. doi: 10.1126/science.1388288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohn K.W. Molecular interaction map of the mammalian cell cycle control and DNA repair systems. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999;10:2703–2734. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.8.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kõivomägi M., Valk E., Venta R., Iofik A., Lepiku M., Balog E.R., Rubin S.M., Morgan D.O., Loog M. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature. 2011;480:128–131. doi: 10.1038/nature10560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazo P.A., DiPaolo J.A., Popescu N.C. Amplification of the integrated viral transforming genes of human papillomavirus 18 and its 5′-flanking cellular sequence located near the myc protooncogene in HeLa cells. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4305–4310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leonhardt H., Rahn H.P., Weinzierl P., Sporbert A., Cremer T., Zink D., Cardoso M.C. Dynamics of DNA replication factories in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 2000;149:271–280. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lukas C., Sørensen C.S., Kramer E., Santoni-Rugiu E., Lindeneg C., Peters J.M., Bartek J., Lukas J. Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature. 1999;401:815–818. doi: 10.1038/44611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machida Y.J., Dutta A. The APC/C inhibitor, Emi1, is essential for prevention of rereplication. Genes Dev. 2007;21:184–194. doi: 10.1101/gad.1495007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín A., Odajima J., Hunt S.L., Dubus P., Ortega S., Malumbres M., Barbacid M. Cdk2 is dispensable for cell cycle inhibition and tumor suppression mediated by p27(Kip1) and p21(Cip1) Cancer Cell. 2005;7:591–598. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller J.J., Summers M.K., Hansen D.V., Nachury M.V., Lehman N.L., Loktev A., Jackson P.K. Emi1 stably binds and inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2410–2420. doi: 10.1101/gad.1454006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montagnoli A., Fiore F., Eytan E., Carrano A.C., Draetta G.F., Hershko A., Pagano M. Ubiquitination of p27 is regulated by Cdk-dependent phosphorylation and trimeric complex formation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1181–1189. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.9.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody C.A., Laimins L.A. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins: pathways to transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:550–560. doi: 10.1038/nrc2886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan D.O. Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997;13:261–291. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Müller D., Bouchard C., Rudolph B., Steiner P., Stuckmann I., Saffrich R., Ansorge W., Huttner W., Eilers M. Cdk2-dependent phosphorylation of p27 facilitates its Myc-induced release from cyclin E/cdk2 complexes. Oncogene. 1997;15:2561–2576. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama K., Ishida N., Shirane M., Inomata A., Inoue T., Shishido N., Horii I., Loh D.Y., Nakayama K. Mice lacking p27(Kip1) display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell. 1996;85:707–720. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nash P., Tang X., Orlicky S., Chen Q., Gertler F.B., Mendenhall M.D., Sicheri F., Pawson T., Tyers M. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature. 2001;414:514–521. doi: 10.1038/35107009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neelsen K.J., Zanini I.M., Mijic S., Herrador R., Zellweger R., Ray Chaudhuri A., Creavin K.D., Blow J.J., Lopes M. Deregulated origin licensing leads to chromosomal breaks by rereplication of a gapped DNA template. Genes Dev. 2013;27:2537–2542. doi: 10.1101/gad.226373.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohtani K., DeGregori J., Nevins J.R. Regulation of the cyclin E gene by transcription factor E2F1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:12146–12150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overton K.W., Spencer S.L., Noderer W.L., Meyer T., Wang C.L. Basal p21 controls population heterogeneity in cycling and quiescent cell cycle states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E4386–E4393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409797111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piatkevich K.D., Hulit J., Subach O.M., Wu B., Abdulla A., Segall J.E., Verkhusha V.V. Monomeric red fluorescent proteins with a large Stokes shift. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:5369–5374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914365107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pines J., Hunter T. Human cyclin A is adenovirus E1A-associated protein p60 and behaves differently from cyclin B. Nature. 1990;346:760–763. doi: 10.1038/346760a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pomerening J.R., Ubersax J.A., Ferrell J.E., Jr. Rapid cycling and precocious termination of G1 phase in cells expressing CDK1AF. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:3426–3441. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poser I., Sarov M., Hutchins J.R., Hériché J.K., Toyoda Y., Pozniakovsky A., Weigl D., Nitzsche A., Hegemann B., Bird A.W. BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:409–415. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabile A., Meyer A.M., Wirbelauer C., Hess D., Kogel U., Scheffner M., Krek W. Regulation of p27 degradation and S-phase progression by Ro52 RING finger protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:5994–6004. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01630-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scaltriti M., Eichhorn P.J., Cortés J., Prudkin L., Aura C., Jiménez J., Chandarlapaty S., Serra V., Prat A., Ibrahim Y.H. Cyclin E amplification/overexpression is a mechanism of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:3761–3766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014835108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwanhäusser B., Busse D., Li N., Dittmar G., Schuchhardt J., Wolf J., Chen W., Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz E., Freese U.K., Gissmann L., Mayer W., Roggenbuck B., Stremlau A., zur Hausen H. Structure and transcription of human papillomavirus sequences in cervical carcinoma cells. Nature. 1985;314:111–114. doi: 10.1038/314111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwob E., Böhm T., Mendenhall M.D., Nasmyth K. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1994;79:233–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheaff R.J., Groudine M., Gordon M., Roberts J.M., Clurman B.E. Cyclin E-CDK2 is a regulator of p27Kip1. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1464–1478. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.11.1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherr C.J., Roberts J.M. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1501–1512. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skotheim J.M., Di Talia S., Siggia E.D., Cross F.R. Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature. 2008;454:291–296. doi: 10.1038/nature07118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen C.S., Lukas C., Kramer E.R., Peters J.M., Bartek J., Lukas J. A conserved cyclin-binding domain determines functional interplay between anaphase-promoting complex-Cdh1 and cyclin A-Cdk2 during cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21:3692–3703. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.11.3692-3703.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer S.L., Cappell S.D., Tsai F.C., Overton K.W., Wang C.L., Meyer T. The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit. Cell. 2013;155:369–383. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tetsu O., McCormick F. Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:233–245. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van den Heuvel S., Harlow E. Distinct roles for cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control. Science. 1993;262:2050–2054. doi: 10.1126/science.8266103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verdugo A., Vinod P.K., Tyson J.J., Novak B. Molecular mechanisms creating bistable switches at cell cycle transitions. Open Biol. 2013;3:120179. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vlach J., Hennecke S., Amati B. Phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. EMBO J. 1997;16:5334–5344. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei W., Ayad N.G., Wan Y., Zhang G.J., Kirschner M.W., Kaelin W.G., Jr. Degradation of the SCF component Skp2 in cell-cycle phase G1 by the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature. 2004;428:194–198. doi: 10.1038/nature02381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinberg R.A. The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell. 1995;81:323–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Won K.A., Reed S.I. Activation of cyclin E/CDK2 is coupled to site-specific autophosphorylation and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin E. EMBO J. 1996;15:4182–4193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang X., Lau K.Y., Sevim V., Tang C. Design principles of the yeast G1/S switch. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao G., Lee T.J., Mori S., Nevins J.R., You L. A bistable Rb-E2F switch underlies the restriction point. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:476–482. doi: 10.1038/ncb1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan X., Srividhya J., De Luca T., Lee J.H., Pomerening J.R. Uncovering the role of APC-Cdh1 in generating the dynamics of S-phase onset. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2014;25:441–456. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-08-0480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zachariae W., Schwab M., Nasmyth K., Seufert W. Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex. Science. 1998;282:1721–1724. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5394.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zetterberg A., Larsson O., Wiman K.G. What is the restriction point? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995;7:835–842. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.