Abstract
The Drosophila Sterile-20 kinase Slik promotes tissue growth during development by stimulating cell proliferation and by preventing apoptosis. Proliferation within an epithelial sheet requires dynamic control of cellular architecture. Epithelial integrity fails in slik mutant imaginal discs. Cells leave the epithelium and undergo apoptosis. The abnormal behavior of slik mutant cells is due to failure to phosphorylate and activate Moesin, which leads to excess Rho1 activity. This is distinct from Slik's effects on cell proliferation, which are mediated by Raf. Thus Slik acts via distinct pathways to coordinate cell proliferation with epithelial cell behavior during tissue growth.
Keywords: Slik, Ste20 kinase, Moesin, epithelial integrity, apoptosis, actin cytoskeleton
Control of tissue growth requires coordination of the rates of cell growth, proliferation, and cell death. Studies in Drosophila and other organisms have demonstrated that proteins involved in cell adhesion and apical-basal polarity also regulate cell proliferation and survival (Gateff 1978; Woods and Bryant 1989; Huang and Ingber 1999; Bilder et al. 2000; Humbert et al. 2003; Zahir and Weaver 2004). Many proteins implicated in cellular transformation, including small GTPases of the Rho family, regulate actin dynamics (Lozano et al. 2003). This indicates that appropriate cellular and tissue architecture is critical for proper regulation of tissue growth. Sterile20 (Ste20) kinases have been implicated in numerous processes, including cytoskeletal regulation (Dan et al. 2001). The Drosophila Slik and Hippo Ste20 kinases regulate cell proliferation, cell survival, and tissue growth. Hippo acts together with Salvador and Warts to suppress growth and promote apoptosis (Harvey et al. 2003; Pantalacci et al. 2003; Udan et al. 2003; Wu et al. 2003). Slik has the opposite effect, promoting growth by accelerating cell proliferation in a Raf-dependent manner. Cells lacking Slik have an intrinsic survival defect and undergo apoptosis (Hipfner and Cohen 2003).
Here, we report that Slik acts on cytoskeletal organization by regulating the ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) protein Moesin. ERM proteins connect the cortical actin cytoskeleton to the cell membrane. The N-terminal FERM (protein 4.1, ERM) domain of these proteins binds to membrane proteins directly or through adaptor proteins (Serrador et al. 1997; Heiska et al. 1998; Reczek and Bretscher 1998; Yonemura et al. 1998; Yun et al. 1998; Denker et al. 2000). The C terminus contains a conserved actin-binding domain (Turunen et al. 1994). Intra-molecular interaction between the FERM and C-terminal domains blocks the membrane protein and actin-binding sites to produce an inactive conformation (Gary and Bretscher 1995; Reczek and Bretscher 1998). Phosphorylation of a conserved threonine residue in the C-terminal domain causes a conformational change that exposes both sites, activating the protein (Matsui et al. 1998).
ERM-mediated linkage of actin to membrane proteins is important for determining cell shape and is required for proper organization of apical membrane structures such as microvilli (Takeuchi et al. 1994). Functional redundancy between Ezrin, Radixin, and Moesin has complicated the genetic analysis of ERM proteins in mammals (Takeuchi et al. 1994; Doi et al. 1999). Moesin is the only Drosophila ERM protein, and mutants lacking Moesin have defects in epithelial organization (Polesello et al. 2002; Speck et al. 2003). moesin mutant cells in the wing imaginal disc lose apical-basal polarity and are extruded from the basal surface of the epithelium. This results in the formation of multilayered rather than monolayered epithelia. All defects are associated with depletion of apical filamentous F-actin and accumulation of F-actin foci and result from overactivation of Rho1 (Speck et al. 2003). We present evidence that Slik regulates Moesin and thereby controls Rho activity. Slik-dependent activation of Moesin is required in proliferating epithelial cells to maintain epithelial integrity and thus cell survival, and is also important for differentiation of actin-based structures in postmitotic cells.
Results and Discussion
Epithelial integrity and cell survival
The wing imaginal disc is an epithelial sac composed of two distinct but continuous epithelial layers enclosing a central lumen. The portion of the disc that will form the wing is a pseudostratified columnar epithelium. In optical cross-section, the dense packing of the cells is visible, with nuclei appearing stacked in layers (Fig. 1A). Overlying the columnar epithelium is the squamous peripodial epithelium. The apical surface of both epithelial layers is oriented toward the lumen of the disc, as seen by the concentration of F-actin near the adherens junctions (Fig. 1A,E). In wing discs lacking Slik activity, the columnar epithelium was abnormally thin (Fig. 1B). Many cells lost their capacity to remain integrated in the epithelium and were extruded basally to form a disorganized mass (Fig. 1B). Many of these cells underwent apoptosis as evidenced by pyknotic nuclei and by TUNEL labeling, though clusters of cells survived (Fig. 1B, arrow). A similar but milder defect was seen in discs with reduced Slik activity. Many apoptotic cells with activated Caspase were seen in optical sections below the epithelial layer (Fig. 1C). Some of the extruded slik mutant cells were alive and appeared mesenchymal, having lost their polarized epithelial character (Fig. 1C,D). These cells produced F-actin-rich filopodia and appeared to acquire motile behavior (Fig. 1D, arrow). Thus slik activity helps cells to maintain epithelial integrity.
The observation that many live slik mutant cells were extruded from the epithelium suggested that loss of epithelial integrity was not a consequence of apoptosis. This was confirmed by producing clones of slik mutant cells that expressed the baculovirus caspase inhibitor p35. p35-expressing slik mutant cells also lost epithelial integrity and were extruded from the epithelium, but remained alive (data not shown). This suggests that apoptosis is a consequence of the loss of epithelial organization, perhaps due to loss of survival signaling by Raf (Hipfner and Cohen 2003).
To investigate whether slik is essential for epithelial polarity per se, we compared the subcellular localization of junctional complex proteins in normal cells and clones of slik1 null mutant cells. In wild-type cells, Slik protein was concentrated apically and colocalized with cortical actin, in addition to a diffuse cytoplasmic staining (Fig. 1E-H). Slik was concentrated apical to septate junctions (marked by Discs large) and adherens junctions (marked by E-Cadherin and anti-phosphotyrosine) and to the apical-most marginal zone complexes containing the PDZ-domain protein Patj, indicating that Slik is at or near the apical membrane rather than in the junctions. Junctional complexes appeared normal in slik mutant cells that remained in the disc epithelium, but were lacking in mutant cells that had left the epithelium (Fig. 1E, arrows). Thus, although it is not essential for apical-basal polarity, slik contributes to maintaining epithelial organization. Cells lacking slik often lose epithelial polarity and leave the epithelium. Many of these cells undergo apoptosis.
Defects in differentiation of microvilli-based structures
slik1 mutant clones generated in the eye disc early in development and provided with a growth advantage can grow to large sizes. As in the wing disc, many cells were extruded from the eye disc and underwent apoptosis, whereas others remained integrated in the epithelium and showed normal expression of the neuronal marker ELAV in photoreceptors (data not shown). Adult eyes with large slik1 mutant clones showed moderate external roughness. Although we found many properly organized ommatidial clusters in these eyes, mutant photoreceptors showed defects during subsequent differentiation. Each photoreceptor normally projects a stack of actin-based microvilli, or rhabdomere, from the apical membrane domain that provides the increased membrane surface for harvesting light. Rhabdomeres form during pupal development (PD; Kumar and Ready 1995). By 70% PD, the eight photoreceptors that comprise a single facet in the wild-type eye have begun to form rhabdomeres consisting of short bundles of microvilli (Fig. 2A, arrows; note that only seven photoreceptors are visible in a section). The cells are connected to each other by adherens junctions, which separate the apical from the basolateral membrane domains (Fig. 2A, circle). At 95% PD the microvilli have extended to form regular bundles (Fig. 2B). The arrangement of photoreceptors was largely normal in complete ommatidia containing slik mutant clones, but many slik mutant photoreceptors had patches of apical membrane devoid of microvilli (Fig. 2C, arrows). Where present, the microvilli in slik mutant photoreceptors did not form organized stacks (Fig. 2C,D). Mutant photoreceptors were present in eyes from 18-day-old adult flies, indicating that their survival as postmitotic cells was not impaired (Fig. 2E,F). These defects resemble those described recently in photoreceptors lacking Moesin (Karagiosis and Ready 2004).
Slik acts via Moesin
The similarity in slik and moesin mutant phenotypes prompted us to compare the defects in imaginal discs in more detail. Loss of Moesin causes defects in epithelial integrity due to Rho1-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton (Speck et al. 2003). Interestingly, we found that cells extruded from moesin mutant discs also underwent massive apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S1A,B). The organizational changes in the actin cytoskeleton were strikingly similar in the two genotypes. These defects in moesin mutant discs can be rescued by reduction of rho1 gene dosage (Speck et al. 2003). Similarly, the defects in epithelial integrity and cell survival in hypomorphic slik mutants were strongly suppressed when rho1 gene dosage was reduced (Supplementary Fig. S1C,D), suggesting that some defects in slik mutants are due to excessive Rho1 activity and that Slik acts in the same pathway as Moesin.
Moesin is activated by phosphorylation on a conserved Threonine residue in the C-terminal domain. Thr 556-phosphorylated Moesin (P-Moesin) colocalized with apical Slik protein in wild-type cells (Fig. 3B, arrowhead), in addition to a diffuse distribution of both proteins. P-Moesin levels were considerably reduced in slik1 clones, compared to adjacent Slik-expressing cells in the wing disc (Fig. 3A,B). Immunoblot analysis showed that Thr 556-phosphorylation was reduced in slik mutant wing discs, as the level of total Moesin was unchanged (Fig. 3C). Likewise, Slik RNAi in S2 cells resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in endogenous Slik protein and in Moesin phosphorylation (Fig. 3D). Expression of the kinase domain of Slik was sufficient to induce PMoesin in the wing disc, whereas a catalytically inactive version of this domain had no effect (Fig. 3E,F). Activated Moesin has been shown to stabilize F-actin (Speck et al. 2003), and we observed increased F-actin staining in Slikkinase domain-expressing cells (Fig. 3E). These data indicate that Slik activity is required for Moesin Thr 556-phosphorylation in vivo. However, we were unable to detect direct phosphorylation of Moesin by Slik in vitro, suggesting that Slik may act indirectly to promote Moesin phosphorylation in vivo.
Speck et al. (2003) showed that activated Moesin limits Rho activity in vivo. Experiments in cultured mammalian cells have suggested that Rho might also act upstream of Moesin to promote its phosphorylation, forming a feedback loop (Matsui et al. 1998; Shaw et al. 1998; Tran Quang et al. 2000). To assess the involvement of Rho in Moesin phosphorylation, we compared the effects of removing Slik, Rho1, and the Rho effector kinase Rok from S2 cells by RNAi. Depletion of endogenous Slik strongly reduced Moesin phosphorylation (Fig. 4A, lane 1). Most cells depleted of Slik showed low levels of Moesin phosphorylation (Fig. 4B, middle row). Expression of the Slik kinase domain in the Slik-depleted cells restored Moesin phosphorylation to an extent that was consistent with the transfection efficiency in the experiment (Fig. 4A [lane 2], B). Depletion of Rho1 caused a modest reduction in Moesin phosphorylation, and expression of the Slik kinase domain increased the level of Moesin phosphorylation in Rho1-depleted cells (Fig. 4A, lanes 3,4). Many cells depleted of Rho1 showed levels of Moesin phosphorylation similar to those of control S2 cells (Fig. 4B, bottom row), and cells expressing the Slik kinase domain were always among those with the higher level of Moesin phosphorylation. This indicates that Rho1 is not required for Slik-induced phosphorylation of Moesin in S2 cells. The mammalian kinase Rock has been suggested to serve as an effector of Rho in mediating ERM protein phosphorylation, though this is controversial (Matsui et al. 1998, 1999; Oshiro et al. 1998; Tran Quang et al. 2000). Here, depletion of the Drosophila ortholog, Rok, from S2 cells had little or no effect on the level of Moesin phosphorylation, and did not prevent Slik kinase domain-induced Moesin phosphorylation (Fig. 4A, lanes 5,6). These observations suggest that Rho1 is not required for Moesin phosphorylation in S2 cells. Although the level of Rho activity is elevated in slik mutants (Supplementary Fig. S1), the level of Moesin phosphorylation is very low (Fig. 3), suggesting that Rho activity cannot compensate for the lack of Slik activity.
Partial rescue of slik mutants by activated Moesin
We next asked whether the epithelial defects in slik mutants could be rescued by expression of a constitutively active, phosphomimetic form of Moesin (MoesinTD; Speck et al. 2003). moeGO323 mutants served as a control. Moesin protein was nearly undetectable in moeGO323 discs by immunoblot (Fig. 5B). In moeGO323 discs, armGAL4 drove ubiquitous MoesinTD expression to a level lower than endogenous Moesin. This level of activated Moesin had no effect on the development of wild-type animals. moeGO323 mutants grew more slowly than wild-type larvae, reached pupal stages later, and died as pupae (Fig. 5A). More than half of the mutant larvae were rescued to pharate adult (25%) or adult stages (28%) by expression of MoesinTD (vs. 0% and 1% for moeGO323). MoesinTD expression also partially rescued slik1 mutants. Nearly half of the slik1 animals survived to pupation, but all died shortly thereafter. In contrast, 9% of slik1 mutants expressing MoesinTD reached the pharate adult stage (Fig. 5A,C). One small rescued slik1 mutant fly survived to adulthood (Fig. 5D). Discs from rescued slik1 mutants showed some improvement in overall structure and actin organization. Basal extrusion of cells was reduced and in some cases nearly eliminated (Fig. 5E).
Slik-driven growth is independent of Moesin regulation
MoesinTD expression did not rescue slik1 animals to the same extent as moeGO323 mutants. Despite improvements in epithelial integrity and the stage of lethality, MoesinTD had little or no effect on the slow rate of development and growth of slik1 mutants (Fig. 5A). One explanation for this may be that Moesin acts downstream of Slik to regulate epithelial integrity but not to promote growth. We tested this by examining the requirement for Moesin in Slik-driven tissue growth. The effect of Slik on cell proliferation is easily observed in the peripodial cells overlying the columnar wing disc epithelium (Supplementary Fig. S2). Expression of Slik in the columnar epithelium induced nonautonomous proliferation of peripodial cells, detectable as an increase in nuclear density and BrdU incorporation. The same effect was observed when Slik was expressed in moeGO323 mutants. Activated MoesinTD did not affect cell proliferation. Thus Moesin is not necessary for Slik-induced cell proliferation, nor is Moesin activity sufficient to stimulate cell proliferation.
We conclude that Slik regulates epithelial integrity via Moesin activation, independent of its effects on tissue growth. Slik-induced tissue growth is Raf-dependent. Expression of a kinase inactive form of Slik is capable of promoting Raf-dependent overproliferation, suggesting that the growth effect may be mediated by protein-protein interactions rather than by Slik kinase activity (Hipfner and Cohen 2003). Consistent with this notion, expression of the kinase domain of Slik alone did not induce cell proliferation or tissue overgrowth. In contrast, Moesin phosphorylation is dependent on Slik kinase activity. Taken together, these observations suggest two distinct effector pathways for Slik—a pathway controlling growth, involving Raf, and a separate pathway controlling epithelial integrity involving Moesin phosphorylation.
What might be the purpose of the dual activities of Slik? Slik is not essential for cells to grow and divide, but it does control the rate of cell proliferation. Slik activity must be maintained within a defined range; too much or too little activity results in apoptosis (Hipfner and Cohen 2003). Mitogenic signaling through Slik could promote tissue growth and at the same time reinforce cellular architecture by maintaining Moesin in an active state. Proliferation-induced apoptosis prevents excessive Slik signaling from deregulating proliferation, as has been suggested for certain oncogenes (Evan and Littlewood 1998; Hipfner and Cohen 2003). Under conditions of reduced mitogenic signaling, decreased Slik activity would result in a lower rate of cell proliferation and, by reducing Moesin activity, make cells more likely to be extruded from the disc and thus to undergo apoptosis. A more direct function of ERM proteins in regulating apoptosis may also be involved (Gautreau et al. 1999; Parlato et al. 2000). Thus, Slik activity may serve as a switch between pro-proliferative and pro-apoptotic states. Consistent with this idea, loss of ERM protein phosphorylation and activity has been shown to be an early event in apoptosis (Kondo et al. 1997). Interestingly, it is known that slowly dividing cells in Drosophila imaginal discs undergo apoptosis as a result of reduced ability to compete for survival factors (Moreno et al. 2002). The dual activity of Slik may help to ensure elimination of less fit cells.
Materials and methods
Fly strains and reagents
slik1 is a null allele that removes the kinase domain; slikKG4837 is a hypomorphic allele as described in Hipfner and Cohen (2003). rho172O was from M. Mlodzik (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY). moeGO323 (Bloomington Stock Center) is caused by a P-element insertion that strongly reduces Moesin protein levels, but must be considered hypomorphic because some Moesin is detectable on immunoblots. UAS-MoeTD was from R. Fehon (Duke University, Durham, NC; Speck et al. 2003). Antibodies used were as follows: rabbit anti-Moesin (D. Kiehart, Duke University, Durham, NC); rabbit anti-Patj (H. Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX); rat anti-E-Cadherin (M. Takeichi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan); mouse anti-Discs Large, mouse anti-Rho (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-cleaved human caspase 3, and rabbit anti-human phospho-ERM antibodies (Cell Signalling Technology); mouse anti-phosphotyrosine (Upstate); and mouse anti-tubulin (Sigma). UAS-slikkin and UAS-slikkin.kd encoding Slik amino acids 1-322 were generated by amplification of wild-type or kinase-inactive mutant (Asp 176 to Phe) slik cDNAs (Hipfner and Cohen 2003). For analysis of slik imaginal discs, w; FRT42D, slik1/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP and w; slikKG4837/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP stocks were used and GFP-negative larvae dissected. Rescue tests were as follows: moeGO323/FM7 KrGAL4 UAS-GFP virgins were crossed to w/Y or w/Y; armGAL4 UAS-MoeTD/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP males. GFP-negative larvae were collected. Only males had the correct genotype. w; armGAL4, slik1/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP virgins were crossed to w; slik1/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP or w; UAS-MoeTD, slik1/CyO KrGAL4 UAS-GFP males. GFP-negative larvae were analyzed. w1118 and armGAL4 UAS-MoeTD larvae were used as controls. Collections and analysis of larvae, TUNEL, BrdU, and antibody labeling were performed as described (Hipfner and Cohen 2003).
Genotypes of larvae for generation of mosaic clones
y, w, ey-FLP, P{GMR-LacZ}; FRT42D, P{w+}, l(2)cl-R11/FRT42D, slik1 (for eye clones).
w, hs-FLP1/+ or Y; FRT42D, P {hs-πmyc}, M (2)531/FRT42D, slik1 (for wing clones). Larvae were heat shocked at 36 h ± 12 h for 40 min at 37.5°C and dissected after ∼5 d.
Imaginal disc extracts
Ten wing/haltere/leg disc complexes were solubilized in 50 μL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100 containing 30 mM NaF and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail, Roche).
RNA interference in S2 cells
Double-stranded RNA was prepared using the following templates: nucleotides 1529-2043 of the coding sequence in Slik CG4527; nucleotides 273-851 of rho1-RA; and nucleotides 2787-3293 of rok-RA. For RNAi, 4 × 106 S2 cells in 1 mL Drosophila serum-free medium supplemented with 16.5 nM L-glutamine (Invitrogen) were plated per well in six-well plates. dsRNA was added to 37 or 74 nM concentration. After 30 min, 2 mL medium was added. Cells were harvested 3 d later. For RNAi and transfection, 2 × 106 S2 cells per well were treated with 12 μg of dsRNA. Two days later, cells were transfected with 2 μg of pMT-Gal4 and 2 μg of pUAST or pUAST-slikkin. After 12 h, the mixture was replaced with medium containing 20 μg of dsRNA. Cells were induced 12 h later by addition of 0.7 mM CuSO4.
Electron microscopy
Bisected heads were fixed for 15 min in ice-cold 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.2. One volume of 2% OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.2 was added for 1 h. Samples were incubated for 4 h on ice in fresh OsO4 solution, dehydrated by successive incubations in an ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 100%), followed by two 10-min washes in propylene oxide. Heads were equilibrated overnight in a 1:1 mixture of polypropylene oxide and Durcupan resin (Fluka), transferred into 100% resin, and incubated at least 6 h at 20°C. Heads were transferred into molds containing fresh resin and baked overnight at 70°C. Ultrathin-sections were cut and poststained with 2% uranyl acetate.
Acknowledgments
We thank Don Ready for advice and Sigrun Brendl and Ken Goldie for assistance with TEM.
Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.303304.
References
- Bilder D., Li, M., and Perrimon, N. 2000. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science 289: 113-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dan I., Watanabe, N.M., and Kusumi, A. 2001. The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades. Trends Cell Biol. 11: 220-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denker S.P., Huang, D.C., Orlowski, J., Furthmayr, H., and Barber, D.L. 2000. Direct binding of the Na-H exchanger NHE1 to ERM proteins regulates the cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape independently of H(+) translocation. Mol. Cell 6: 1425-1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doi Y., Itoh, M., Yonemura, S., Ishihara, S., Takano, H., Noda, T., and Tsukita, S. 1999. Normal development of mice and unimpaired cell adhesion/cell motility/actin-based cytoskeleton without compensatory up-regulation of ezrin or radixin in moesin gene knockout. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 2315-2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evan G. and Littlewood, T. 1998. A matter of life and cell death. Science 281: 1317-1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gary R. and Bretscher, A. 1995. Ezrin self-association involves binding of an N-terminal domain to a normally masked C-terminal domain that includes the F-actin binding site. Mol. Biol. Cell 6: 1061-1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gateff E. 1978. Malignant neoplasms of genetic origin in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 200: 1448-1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gautreau A., Poullet, P., Louvard, D., and Arpin, M. 1999. Ezrin, a plasma membrane-microfilament linker, signals cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 7300-7305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey K.F., Pfleger, C.M., and Hariharan, I.K. 2003. The Drosophila Mst ortholog, hippo, restricts growth and cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell 114: 457-467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heiska L., Alfthan, K., Gronholm, M., Vilja, P., Vaheri, A., and Carpen, O. 1998. Association of ezrin with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and -2 (ICAM-1 and ICAM-2). Regulation by phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 21893-21900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hipfner D.R. and Cohen, S.M. 2003. The Drosophila Sterile-20 kinase Slik controls cell proliferation and apoptosis during imaginal disc development. PLoS. Biol. 1: 244-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S. and Ingber, D.E. 1999. The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat. Cell Biol. 1: E131-E138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humbert P., Russell, S., and Richardson, H. 2003. Dlg, Scribble and Lgl in cell polarity, cell proliferation and cancer. Bioessays 25: 542-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karagiosis S.A. and Ready, D.F. 2004. Moesin contributes an essential structural role in Drosophila photoreceptor morphogenesis. Development 131: 725-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondo T., Takeuchi, K., Doi, Y., Yonemura, S., Nagata, S., and Tsukita, S. 1997. ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin)-based molecular mechanism of microvillar breakdown at an early stage of apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 139: 749-758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar J.P. and D.F. Ready. 1995. Rhodopsin plays an essential structural role in Drosophila photoreceptor development. Development 121: 4359-4370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lozano E., Betson, M., and Braga, V.M. 2003. Tumor progression: Small GTPases and loss of cell-cell adhesion. Bioessays 25: 452-463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsui T., Maeda, M., Doi, Y., Yonemura, S., Amano, M., Kaibuchi, K., and Tsukita, S. 1998. Rho-kinase phosphorylates COOH-terminal threonines of ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins and regulates their head-to-tail association. J. Cell. Biol. 140: 647-657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsui T., Yonemura, S., and Tsukita, S. 1999. Activation of ERM proteins in vivo by Rho involves phosphatidyl-inositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase and not ROCK kinases. Curr. Biol. 9: 1259-1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno E., Basler, K., and Morata, G. 2002. Cells compete for decapentaplegic survival factor to prevent apoptosis in Drosophila wing development. Nature 416: 755-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oshiro N., Fukata, Y., and Kaibuchi, K. 1998. Phosphorylation of moesin by rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) plays a crucial role in the formation of microvilli-like structures. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 34663-34666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pantalacci S., Tapon, N., and Leopold, P. 2003. The Salvador partner Hippo promotes apoptosis and cell-cycle exit in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 921-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parlato S., Giammarioli, A.M., Logozzi, M., Lozupone, F., Matarrese, P., Luciani, F., Falchi, M., Malorni, W., and Fais, S. 2000. CD95 (APO-1/Fas) linkage to the actin cytoskeleton through ezrin in human T lymphocytes: A novel regulatory mechanism of the CD95 apoptotic pathway. EMBO J. 19: 5123-5134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polesello C., Delon, I., Valenti, P., Ferrer, P., and Payre, F. 2002. Dmoesin controls actin-based cell shape and polarity during Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4: 782-789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reczek D. and Bretscher, A. 1998. The carboxyl-terminal region of EBP50 binds to a site in the amino-terminal domain of ezrin that is masked in the dormant molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 18452-18458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serrador J.M., Alonso-Lebrero, J.L., del Pozo, M.A., Furthmayr, H., Schwartz-Albiez, R., Calvo, J., Lozano, F., and Sanchez-Madrid, F. 1997. Moesin interacts with the cytoplasmic region of intercellular adhesion molecule-3 and is redistributed to the uropod of T lymphocytes during cell polarization. J. Cell Biol. 138: 1409-1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaw R.J., Henry, M., Solomon, F., and Jacks, T. 1998. RhoA-dependent phosphorylation and relocalization of ERM proteins into apical membrane/actin protrusions in fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 9: 403-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Speck O., Hughes, S.C., Noren, N.K., Kulikauskas, R.M., and Fehon, R.G. 2003. Moesin functions antagonistically to the Rho pathway to maintain epithelial integrity. Nature 421: 83-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takeuchi K., Sato, N., Kasahara, H., Funayama, N., Nagafuchi, A., Yonemura, S., and Tsukita, S. 1994. Perturbation of cell adhesion and microvilli formation by antisense oligonucleotides to ERM family members. J. Cell Biol. 125: 1371-1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran Quang C., Gautreau, A., Arpin, M., and Treisman, R. 2000. Ezrin function is required for ROCK-mediated fibroblast transformation by the Net and Dbl oncogenes. EMBO J. 19: 4565-4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turunen O., Wahlstrom, T., and Vaheri, A. 1994. Ezrin has a COOH-terminal actin-binding site that is conserved in the ezrin protein family. J. Cell Biol. 126: 1445-1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udan R.S., Kango-Singh, M., Nolo, R., Tao, C., and Halder, G. 2003. Hippo promotes proliferation arrest and apoptosis in the Salvador/Warts pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 914-920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woods D.F. and Bryant, P.J. 1989. Molecular cloning of the lethal(1)discs large-1 oncogene of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 134: 222-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu S., Huang, J., Dong, J., and Pan, D. 2003. hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell 114: 445-456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yonemura S., Hirao, M., Doi, Y., Takahashi, N., Kondo, T., and Tsukita, S. 1998. Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to a positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxta-membrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2. J. Cell Biol. 140: 885-895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yun C.H., Lamprecht, G., Forster, D.V., and Sidor, A. 1998. NHE3 kinase A regulatory protein E3KARP binds the epithelial brush border Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 and the cytoskeletal protein ezrin. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 25856-25863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahir N. and Weaver, V.M. 2004. Death in the third dimension: Apoptosis regulation and tissue architecture. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 14: 1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]