Skip to main content
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report logoLink to Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
. 2017 Mar 10;66(9):246–253. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6609e1

Vital Signs: Prevalence of Doctor-Diagnosed Arthritis and Arthritis-Attributable Activity Limitation — United States, 2013–2015

Kamil E Barbour 1,, Charles G Helmick 1, Michael Boring 1, Teresa J Brady 1
PMCID: PMC5687192  PMID: 28278145

Abstract

Background

In the United States, doctor-diagnosed arthritis is a common and disabling chronic condition. Arthritis can lead to severe joint pain and poor physical function, and it can negatively affect quality of life.

Methods

CDC analyzed 2013–2015 data from the National Health Interview Survey, an annual, nationally representative, in-person interview survey of the health status and behaviors of the noninstitutionalized civilian U.S. adult population, to update previous prevalence estimates of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

Results

On average, during 2013–2015, 54.4 million (22.7%) adults had doctor-diagnosed arthritis, and 23.7 million (43.5% of those with arthritis) had arthritis-attributable activity limitations (an age-adjusted increase of approximately 20% in the proportion of adults with arthritis reporting activity limitations since 2002 [p-trend <0.001]). Among adults with heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, the prevalences of doctor-diagnosed arthritis were 49.3%, 47.1%, and 30.6%, respectively; the prevalences of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with these conditions and arthritis were 54.5% (heart disease), 54.0% (diabetes), and 49.0% (obesity).

Conclusions and Comments

The prevalence of arthritis is high, particularly among adults with comorbid conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Furthermore, the prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations is high and increasing over time. Approximately half of adults with arthritis and heart disease, arthritis and diabetes, or arthritis and obesity are limited by their arthritis. Greater use of evidence-based physical activity and self-management education interventions can reduce pain and improve function and quality of life for adults with arthritis and also for adults with other chronic conditions who might be limited by their arthritis.

Introduction

In the United States, doctor-diagnosed arthritis is a common and widespread chronic condition (1,2). Arthritis is a leading cause of disability (3) and is projected to affect 78.4 million adults by 2040 (4). The most common form of arthritis is osteoarthritis; other forms include, but are not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, and fibromyalgia. The annual direct medical costs attributable to arthritis are approximately $81 billion in the United States (5). About one million knee and hip joint replacements occur each year; 99% occur because of arthritis-related pain and functional limitations (6). Among adults with arthritis, 27% report severe joint pain (7); one third of adults aged ≥45 years report anxiety or depression (8); three in 10 find stooping, bending, or kneeling very difficult; approximately 20% cannot or find it very difficult to walk three blocks (approximately one quarter mile) or push/pull large objects (9). Adults with arthritis are more than twice as likely to report an injury related to a fall (10), and working-aged adults with arthritis have lower employment rates compared with adults without arthritis (5).

Arthritis is a common comorbid condition among adults with heart disease, diabetes, or obesity, and the combination of arthritis and one of these chronic conditions has been found to be associated with greater levels of physical inactivity (11). Moreover, arthritis may also hinder the ability of adults with prediabetes to engage in the physical activity recommended to prevent diabetes (12).

Many adults with arthritis are prescribed opioids (13), but safer options exist to help manage arthritis-associated pain. The CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain states that insufficient evidence for and serious risks associated with long-term use of opioid therapy to treat chronic pain exist, and recommends use of exercise therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, certain interventional procedures, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of arthritis (14). Although medications can help, nonpharmaceutical measures help as well. For example, physical activity decreases pain and improves function, each by almost 40% (15), and self-management education interventions produce improvements in a person’s confidence and skills to manage their condition and can reduce pain, fatigue, and depression by 10% to 20% (16). However, self-management education interventions are underused by adults with arthritis; only about 11% reported ever having taken a course (17). Furthermore, approximately one in three adults with arthritis report no leisure-time physical activity (18). A health care provider’s recommendation to patients with arthritis is important, because adults with arthritis are significantly more likely to attend a self-management education program to learn to manage their condition when recommended by a provider than adults with arthritis who were not recommended (19,20). Physical activity programs can reduce yearly health care costs. For example, an analysis found that participation in EnhanceFitness,* an evidence-based physical activity intervention, reduced total health care costs by $945 per person (21), and produced substantial improvements (up to 18%) in function (e.g., muscle strength and balance) and self-reported health at follow-up at 8 months (22).

To update prevalence estimates of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations, CDC analyzed 2013–2015 data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

Methods

NHIS is an annual, nationally representative, in-person interview survey of the health status and behaviors of the noninstitutionalized civilian U.S. adult population. In each household identified, one adult is randomly selected in each family to complete the “sample adult” questionnaire. Sampling weights were applied to account for household nonresponse and oversampling of non-Hispanic blacks (blacks), Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Asians (Asians). Poststratification adjustments were applied by the National Center for Health Statistics using 2010 census estimates for the years 2013–2015. NHIS data from 2013 (N = 34,557), 2014 (36,697), and 2015 (33,672) were combined and weighted. Annualized unadjusted and age-adjusted prevalence estimates (standardized to the projected 2000 U.S. standard population) (23) were calculated overall and stratified by selected demographic (sex, age group, race/ethnicity, education level, and employment status) and health (body mass index category,§ physical activity level, health status, doctor-diagnosed heart disease,** and doctor-diagnosed diabetes) characteristics. Absolute percent differences for all comparisons to the referent subgroups within each characteristic were considered statistically significant if the 95% confidence intervals of the differences of the age-adjusted estimates did not include zero. Orthogonal linear contrasts were performed to examine trends over time since 2002 in the age-adjusted prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with arthritis.

Having doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as answering “yes” to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?” That standard question, in use since 2002, was designed to incorporate key elements of the 1994 public health definition of arthritis developed by the National Arthritis Data Workgroup, which sought to capture conditions treated by a rheumatologist or considered arthritis or a rheumatic condition by health care providers. Those who responded “yes” to arthritis also were asked “Are you now limited in any way in any of your usual activities because of arthritis or joint symptoms?” Persons responding “yes” to both questions were categorized as having arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

Results

During 2013–2015, an estimated 22.7% (54.4 million; age-adjusted prevalence = 21.0%) of all U.S. adults had doctor-diagnosed arthritis. Almost half (49.6%, 22.2 million) of adults aged ≥65 years had arthritis; 7.1% (8.0 million) of young adults (aged 18–44 years) and 29.3% (24.2 million) of middle-aged adults (aged 45–64 years) had arthritis (Table 1). The majority of adults with arthritis (59.0%, 32.2 million) were aged <65 years. The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis was significantly higher among women (23.5%) than men (18.1%), and was significantly lower among Hispanics (15.4%) and Asians (11.8%) than non-Hispanic whites (whites) (22.6%), and among adults who completed college or higher (17.9%) than adults who had less than a high school education (21.2%). The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis was highest among adults who were unable to work (43.9%) (Table 1). The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis was lower among adults meeting physical activity recommendations (18.1%) than adults who reported insufficient activity (23.1%) or inactivity (23.6%), and higher among adults with fair/poor health (40.5%) than adults with very good/excellent health (15.4%) (Table 1).

TABLE 1. Unadjusted and age-adjusted* annualized weighted prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis in the adult (aged ≥18 years) population, by selected characteristics — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2013–2015.

Demographic/Health characteristic Unweighted sample size§ Annualized weighted sample size (millions)§ Weighted population distribution (%) Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis
% (95% CI)
Unadjusted Age-adjusted APD
Overall
104,784
239.5
(100)
22.7 (22.2 to 23.2)
21.0 (20.6 to 21.3)
NA
Age group (yrs)
18–44
44,928
112.1
(46.8)
7.1 (6.8 to 7.5)
NA
NA
45–64
35,165
82.6
(34.5)
29.3 (28.6 to 30.0)
NA
NA
≥65
24,691
44.8
(18.7)
49.6 (48.6 to 50.5)
NA
NA
Sex
Men
46,851
115.4
(48.2)
19.1 (18.5 to 19.7)
18.1 (17.6 to 18.6)
Referent
Women
57,933
124.1
(51.8)
26.0 (25.5 to 26.6)
23.5 (23.1 to 24.0)
5.4 (4.9 to 6.0)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
64,108
157.0
(65.5)
26.3 (25.7 to 26.9)
22.6 (22.2 to 23.1)
Referent
Black, non-Hispanic
14,493
27.9
(11.6)
21.8 (20.9 to 22.8)
22.2 (21.4 to 23.0)
−0.4 (−1.3 to 0.4)
Hispanic
17,571
36.6
(15.3)
12.1 (11.4 to 12.8)
15.4 (14.6 to 16.1)
−7.3 (−8.2 to −6.4)
Asian, non-Hispanic
5,957
13.1
(5.5)
11.1 (10.1 to 12.2)
11.8 (10.9 to 12.8)
−10.8 (−11.9 to −9.8)
Multiple race, non-Hispanic
1,716
3.2
(1.3)
21.7 (19.1 to 24.5)
25.2 (22.7 to 27.9)
2.6 (−0.2 to 5.3)
American Indian/Alaska Native, non-Hispanic
741
1.3
(0.5)
24.6 (20.5 to 29.1)
24.4 (20.4 to 28.8)
1.7 (−2.4 to 5.9)
Education level
<High school diploma
15,489
31.6
(13.3)
25.9 (24.9 to 26.8)
21.2 (21.2 to 22.6)
Referent
High school diploma
26,699
61.0
(25.6)
25.3 (24.5 to 26.1)
22.1 (21.5 to 22.8)
0.3 (−0.7 to 1.2)
At least some college
32,073
73.7
(30.9)
22.8 (22.1 to 23.5)
22.8 (22.2 to 23.4)
0.9 (0.0 to 1.7)
Completed college or greater
30,054
72.0
(30.2)
19.1 (18.4 to 19.8)
17.9 (17.4 to 18.5)
−3.9 (−4.9 to −3.0)
Employment status
Employed/Self-employed
61,427
147.7
(61.7)
14.9 (14.5 to 15.4)
17.7 (17.2 to 18.2)
Referent
Unemployed
5,577
13.6
(5.7)
14.3 (13.1 to 15.5)
19.3 (17.6 to 21.1)
1.7 (−0.2 to 3.5)
Unable to work
8,241
16.5
(6.9)
52.0 (50.3 to 53.7)
43.9 (42.2 to 45.7)
26.2 (24.5 to 28.0)
Other**
29,491
61.6
(25.7)
35.4 (34.5 to 36.2)
21.1 (20.4 to 21.7)
3.4 (2.6 to 4.2)
Physical activity
Meeting recommendations
49,063
115.8
(49.2)
17.3 (16.7 to 17.9)
18.1 (17.6 to 18.6)
Referent
Insufficient activity
20,398
46.9
(19.9)
26.0 (25.1 to 26.9)
23.1 (22.4 to 23.9)
5.1 (4.2 to 5.9)
Inactive
33,565
72.5
(30.9)
29.2 (28.5 to 30.0)
23.6 (23.1 to 24.2)
5.6 (4.8 to 6.3)
Health status
Very good/Excellent
60,381
145.1
(60.6)
14.5 (14.0 to 14.9)
15.4 (15.1 to 15.8)
Referent
Good
28,719
63.3
(26.5)
28.1 (27.3 to 29.0)
23.8 (23.2 to 24.5)
8.4 (7.7 to 9.1)
Fair/Poor
15,642
31.0
(13.0)
50.0 (48.9 to 51.2)
40.5 (39.3 to 41.7)
25 (23.7 to 26.4)
Body mass index
Underweight/Normal weight
36,317
84.3
(36.5)
16.4 (15.8 to 16.9)
16.4 (16.0 to 16.9)
Referent
Overweight
34,617
79.1
(34.2)
22.5 (21.8 to 23.2)
19.7 (19.1 to 20.2)
3.2 (2.6 to 3.9)
Obese
30,240
67.8
(29.3)
30.6 (29.7 to 31.4)
27.7 (27.0 to 28.4)
11.3 (10.5 to 11.5)
Heart disease
No
91,280
211.6
(88.4)
19.2 (18.8 to 19.6)
19.1 (18.8 to 19.5)
Referent
Yes
13,387
27.6
(11.6)
49.3 (48.1 to 50.5)
36.4 (34.9 to 38.0)
17.3 (15.7 to 18.9)
Diabetes
No
93,715
217.1
(90.7)
20.2 (19.7 to 20.7)
19.8 (19.4 to 20.2)
Referent
Yes 11,044 22.4 (9.3) 47.1 (45.8 to 48.4) 33.7 (32.0 to 35.4) 13.9 (12.1 to 15.6)

Abbreviations: APD = absolute percent difference; CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.

* Age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. projected adult population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as an affirmative response to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?

§ Some categories might not sum to overall because of missing information on some characteristics.

APD for age-adjusted estimates.

** Students, volunteers, homemakers, retirees.

The unadjusted prevalences of arthritis among adults with obesity, heart disease, or diabetes were 30.6%, 49.3%, and 47.1%, respectively (Table 1) After adjustment for age, adults who had obesity compared with no obesity, had diabetes compared with no diabetes, or had heart disease compared with no heart disease were approximately 1.5, 1.7, and 1.9 times more likely to have arthritis, respectively (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

The figure above is a bar chart showing the age-adjusted percentage of adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis, by obesity, diabetes, and heart disease status, in the United States during 2013–2015.

Age-adjusted percentage* of adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis, by obesity, diabetes, and heart disease status — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2013–2015

* With 95% confidence intervals indicated by error bars.

Among adults with arthritis, an estimated 43.5% (23.7 million; age-adjusted prevalence = 41.7%) had arthritis-attributable activity limitations (Table 2). The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations was higher among women (43.8%) than men (38.5%); among blacks (48.6%), Hispanics (44.3%), and non-Hispanic multiracial adults (50.5%) than among whites (40.1%); among adults with less than a high school education (52.1%) than among adults with higher education (32.1%–43.6%); and among adults who were unable to work (80%) or unemployed (48.4%) than among adults who were employed (28.3%) (Table 2). The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations was higher among adults who were physically inactive (54.0%) than adults meeting recommendations (30.1%); among adults with fair/poor health (70.6%) than adults with very good/excellent health (23.2%); and among adults who had obesity (45.2%), heart disease (54.8%), and diabetes (52.5%) (Table 2).

TABLE 2. Unadjusted and age-adjusted* annualized weighted prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitation among adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis, by selected characteristics — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2013–2015.

Demographic/Health characteristic Unweighted sample size§ Annualized weighted sample size (millions)§ Weighted distribution of characteristic (%) Prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations
% (95% CI)
Unadjusted Age-adjusted APD
Overall
26,442
54.3
(100)
43.5 (42.6 to 44.4)
41.7 (40.3 to 43.1)
NA
Age group (yrs)
18–44
3,360
8.0
(14.7)
39.4 (37.0 to 41.8)
NA
NA
45–64
10,761
24.1
(44.5)
44.5 (43.1 to 45.8)
NA
NA
≥65
12,321
22.2
(40.9)
44.0 (42.8 to 45.2)
NA
NA
Sex
Men
9,740
22.0
(40.5)
40.7 (39.2 to 42.1)
38.5 (36.4 to 40.7)
Referent
Women
16,702
32.3
(59.5)
45.4 (44.5 to 46.4)
43.8 (42.2 to 45.5)
5.3 (2.7 to 7.8)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
18,563
41.3
(76.0)
42.1 (41.0 to 43.2)
40.1 (38.4 to 41.9)
Referent
Black, non-Hispanic
3,888
6.1
(11.2)
49.9 (47.8 to 52.0)
48.6 (45.2 to 52.0)
8.5 (4.7 to 12.2)
Hispanic
2,577
4.4
(8.1)
47.7 (45.1 to 50.3)
44.3 (41.0 to 47.6)
4.1 (0.5 to 7.8)
Asian, non-Hispanic
716
1.5
(2.7)
38.9 (34.3 to 43.7)
37.6 (27.5 to 49.0)
−2.5 (−13.5 to 8.5)
Multiple race, non-Hispanic
468
0.7
(1.3)
51.3 (44.5 to 58.0)
50.5 (41.7 to 59.2)
10.3 (1.1 to 19.5)
American Indian/Alaska Native, non-Hispanic
201
0.3
(0.6)
54.0 (44.0 to 63.6)
51.6 (37.9 to 65.0)
11.4 (−2.6 to 25.5)
Education level
<High school diploma
4,634
8.2
(15.1)
55.1 (52.9 to 57.2)
52.1 (47.9 to 56.3)
Referent
High school diploma
7,421
15.4
(28.5)
44.0 (42.4 to 45.7)
43.1 (40.5 to 45.7)
−9 (−13.9 to −4.2)
At least some college
8,154
16.8
(31.1)
44.9 (43.5 to 46.4)
43.6 (41.5 to 45.7)
−8.5 (−13.2 to −3.8)
Completed college or greater
6,131
13.7
(25.4)
34.2 (32.5 to 36.0)
32.1 (29.4 to 34.8)
−20 (−25.0 to −15.1)
Employment status
Employed/Self-employed
9,600
22.0
(40.5)
28.3 (27.1 to 29.6)
28.3 (26.8 to 29.9)
Referent
Unemployed
915
1.9
(3.6)
47.5 (43.2 to 51.7)
48.4 (43.8 to 53.1)
20.1 (15.2 to 25.0)
Unable to work
4,511
8.6
(15.8)
81.3 (79.6 to 82.8)
80.0 (76.9 to 82.8)
51.7 (48.5 to 54.9)
Other**
11,411
21.8
(40.1)
43.7 (42.5 to 44.9)
44.9 (40.8 to 49.1)
16.6 (12.4 to 20.8)
Physical activity
Meeting recommendations
9,380
20.0
(37.5)
30.1 (28.9 to 31.4)
30.1 (28.4 to 31.9)
Referent
Insufficient activity
5,804
12.2
(22.8)
43.8 (42.0 to 45.7)
43.0 (40.2 to 45.8)
12.9 (9.6 to 16.1)
Inactive
10,800
21.2
(39.7)
55.8 (54.4 to 57.1)
54.0 (51.4 to 56.6)
23.9 (20.8 to 27.0)
Health status
Very good/Excellent
9,632
21.0
(38.6)
23.4 (22.3 to 24.6)
23.2 (21.6 to 24.9)
Referent
Good
8,729
17.8
(32.8)
42.4 (41.0 to 43.8)
41.3 (38.8 to 43.7)
18.1 (15.0 to 21.2)
Fair/Poor
8,072
15.5
(28.6)
72.0 (70.6 to 73.4)
70.6 (68.0 to 73.2)
47.4 (44.5 to 50.4)
Body mass index
Underweight/Normal weight
6,770
13.8
(26.3)
39.7 (38.2 to 41.3)
39.3 (36.6 to 42.0)
Referent
Overweight
8,514
17.8
(34.0)
39.7 (38.2 to 41.2)
38.7 (36.5 to 41.0)
−0.6 (−3.8 to 2.7)
Obese
10,172
20.7
(39.6)
49.0 (47.7 to 50.4)
45.2 (43.3 to 47.1)
5.9 (2.8 to 9.0)
Heart disease
No
19,455
40.6
(74.9)
39.9 (38.8 to 40.8)
38.7 (37.2 to 40.3)
Referent
Yes
6,931
13.6
(25.1)
54.5 (53.0 to 56.1)
54.8 (50.9 to 58.6)
16 (11.8 to 20.8)
Diabetes
No
21,048
43.8
(80.6)
41.0 (40.0 to 41.9)
39.9 (38.5 to 41.4)
Referent
Yes 5,386 10.5 (19.4) 54.0 (52.1 to 55.8) 52.5 (47.7 to 57.2) 12.5 (7.6 to 17.4)

Abbreviation: APD = absolute percent difference, CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.

* Age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. projected adult population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as an affirmative response to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia? Those who answered “yes” were asked “Are you now limited in any way in any of your usual activities because of arthritis or joint symptoms?” Persons responding “yes” to both questions were defined as having arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

§ Some categories might not sum to overall because of missing information on some characteristics.

APD for age-adjusted estimates.

** Students, volunteers, homemakers, retirees.

The age-adjusted prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with arthritis was significantly higher in 2015 (42.8%; 95% CI = 40.5–45.1) compared with 2002 (35.9%; 95% CI = 34.1–37.6), an increase of 19.2% (p-trend <0.001) (Figure 2). The age-adjusted prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis did not change significantly over time (p-trend = 0.71).

Figure 2.

The figure above is a line chart showing the age-adjusted percentage of persons with arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis in the United States during 2002–2015.

Age-adjusted percentage* of persons with arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2002–2015

* With 95% confidence intervals indicated by error bars.

Conclusions and Comments

During 2013–2015, an average of more than one in five (54.4 million) adults in the United States had doctor-diagnosed arthritis, with 43.5% (23.7 million) of adults with arthritis reporting arthritis-attributable activity limitations. The prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with arthritis increased by almost 20% over time (2002–2015) independent of the aging of the U.S. population, resulting in greater pain, disability, costs, and decreased quality of life.

As found in analyses of earlier NHIS surveys (1), women and adults who were unable to work, with fair/poor health, or with obesity, heart disease, or diabetes, not only had a higher prevalence of arthritis, but also had a higher prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations. The prevalence of arthritis among adults who were unemployed was similar to the prevalence among employed adults, but unemployed adults had a much higher prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations, suggesting that arthritis-attributable activity limitations might play a role in their unemployment (5). Similar to past analyses, blacks and whites had a similar prevalence of arthritis, but the prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations was higher among blacks. Hispanics had a much lower prevalence of arthritis, but a proportionately higher prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

Our findings suggest that the burden of arthritis is increasing and requires more widespread use of existing, underused evidence-based interventions. Physical activity is a proven strategy for managing arthritis, with known benefits for the management of many other chronic conditions (15). Arthritis is common among adults with heart disease, diabetes, or obesity, and the combination of arthritis and one of these chronic conditions has been associated with higher levels of physical inactivity (11), suggesting that arthritis-specific barriers to physical activity (concerns about worsening pain, damaging joints, and safely exercising) might be important concerns for adults with those conditions. Improving the health of adults with arthritis, including those with these combined chronic conditions, needs to include wider dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions. These interventions meet the unique needs of adults with arthritis and have been found to reduce pain and improve function, mood, and confidence to manage health and quality of life (15,16).

A U.S. Department of Health and Human Services initiative addresses the effects of multiple chronic conditions,†† which now affect one in four adults and are becoming increasingly common as the population ages. A previous study on multiple chronic conditions among adults aged ≥25 years found that arthritis is frequently present among the most common combinations of two and three conditions (24). CDC is promoting greater coordination among chronic disease programs within state health departments to address these chronic disease comorbidity concerns.§§ Active promotion of evidence-based self-management education and physical activity interventions is appropriate for various chronic conditions. The self-management education¶¶ and physical activity interventions*** that CDC recommends for adults with arthritis are examples of proven, low-cost, community interventions that can benefit adults with arthritis, physical limitations, and other chronic conditions.

The findings in this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, doctor-diagnosed arthritis was self-reported and not confirmed by a health care professional; however, this case definition was validated for public health surveillance (25). Second, because NHIS is a cross-sectional survey, a causal relationship between risk factors (i.e., obesity or physical activity) and arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations could not be established, although strong evidence exists that indicates obesity is associated with an increased risk for incident knee osteoarthritis (a common form of arthritis) (26). Third, social desirability bias might play a role in some self-reported characteristics, with underreporting of weight and overreporting of height and leisure-time physical activity. Fourth, from 2013 to 2015, the NHIS response rates were 61.2%, 58.9%, 55.2%, respectively, indicating potential nonresponse bias, although survey weights were applied to address this bias and improve external validity (27). Fifth, if multivariate analyses were to be performed, certain observed group differences, such as those related to race/ethnicity and arthritis-attributable activity limitations, might have been explained by differences in prevalence of comorbid conditions or other factors (e.g., health care access). Finally, NHIS does not survey persons in long-term care institutions (e.g., nursing homes for the elderly and hospitals for the chronically ill or physically or intellectually disabled); therefore, this analysis likely underestimates the prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

Arthritis is a large and growing clinical and public health problem. In 2017, CDC is funding arthritis programs in 12 states to disseminate arthritis-appropriate evidence-based physical activity and self-management education interventions in their communities.††† Given the high prevalence of arthritis and the increase in arthritis-attributable activity limitations in the United States, health care providers and public health practitioners can address arthritis and other chronic conditions by prioritizing proven, nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as self-management education and appropriate physical activity, as effective ways to improve health outcomes, especially for groups with the highest prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations.

Key Points.

• Arthritis is common, expensive, and a leading cause of disability. An estimated 54.4 million adults (22.7%) had doctor-diagnosed arthritis.

• Approximately 24 million adults with arthritis had activity limitations attributable to arthritis. Among adults with arthritis, the percentage limited by arthritis has increased by almost 20% over time.

• Approximately half of all adults with heart disease or diabetes had arthritis. Nearly one third of adults who with obesity also had arthritis. Arthritis makes managing these conditions harder.

• Adults with arthritis are often prescribed opioids in the United States; however, better ways to help manage arthritis often exist. For example, physical activity can reduce pain and improve physical function by approximately 40%. However, one in three adults with arthritis report no leisure time physical activity.

• Using confidence and skills learned in self-management education workshops can help reduce pain, fatigue, and depression by 10% to 20%. However, only 11% had taken a self-management education workshop.

• Health care providers can play an important role in the management of arthritis. For example, adults with arthritis are more likely to attend a self-management education program when it is recommended by a health care provider.

• Additional information is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns.

Footnotes

Survey description documents are available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm.

§

Body mass index = weight (kg)/(height [m])2; categorized as underweight/normal weight (<25.0), overweight (25.0 to <30.0), or obese (≥30.0).

Determined from responses to six questions regarding frequency and duration of participation in leisure-time activities of moderate or vigorous intensity and categorized according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Total minutes (moderate to vigorous) of physical activity per week were categorized as follows: meeting recommendations (≥150 min per week); insufficient activity (1–149 min); or inactive (0 min).

**

Adults were considered to have doctor-diagnosed heart disease if they answered yes to any of the following four questions: “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had coronary heart disease? Angina, also called angina pectoris? A heart attack (also called myocardial infarction)? Any kind of heart condition or heart disease (other than the ones I just asked about)?”

References

  • 1.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Theis KA, et al. Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2010–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:869–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Zhang X, Lu H, Holt JB. Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis at state and county levels—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:489–94. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6519a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CDC. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:421–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Barbour KE, Theis KA, Boring MA. Updated projected prevalence of self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation among US adults, 2015–2040. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1582–7. 10.1002/art.39692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yelin E, Murphy L, Cisternas MG, Foreman AJ, Pasta DJ, Helmick CG. Medical care expenditures and earnings losses among persons with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in 2003, and comparisons with 1997. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1397–407. 10.1002/art.22565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Helmick CG, Watkins-Castillo SI. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: prevalence, societal and economic bosts (BMUS). 3rd ed. Rosemont, IL: The United States Bone and Joint Initiative; 2014. http://www.boneandjointburden.org/2014-report/ive0/joint-replacement [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barbour KE, Boring M, Helmick CG, Murphy LB, Qin J. Prevalence of severe joint pain among adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis—United States, 2002–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1052–6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6539a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murphy LB, Sacks JJ, Brady TJ, Hootman JM, Chapman DP. Anxiety and depression among US adults with arthritis: prevalence and correlates. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:968–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Theis KA, Murphy L, Hootman JM, Wilkie R. Social participation restriction among US adults with arthritis: a population-based study using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:1059–69. 10.1002/acr.21977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barbour KE, Stevens JA, Helmick CG, et al. Falls and fall injuries among adults with arthritis—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:379–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.CDC. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with obesity—United States, 2007 and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:614–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strauss SM, McCarthy M. Arthritis-related limitations predict insufficient physical activity in adults with prediabetes identified in the NHANES 2011–2014. Diabetes Educ 2017. Epub February 7, 2017. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0145721717691849?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Hootman JM, Cisternas M, Murphy L, Losby J. Prevalence and trends in prescribed opioid use among US adults with arthritis, 2008–2013, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [Abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(suppl 10). http://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-trends-in-prescribed-opioid-use-among-us-adults-with-arthritis-2008-2013-medical-expenditure-panel-survey
  • 14.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(RR-1). 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Hootman JM, Jones DL. Effects of community-deliverable exercise on pain and physical function in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:79–93. 10.1002/acr.20347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brady TJ, Murphy L, O’Colmain BJ, et al. A meta-analysis of health status, health behaviors, and healthcare utilization outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120112. 10.5888/pcd10.120112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murphy LB, Brady TJ, Boring MA, et al. Self-management education participation among US adults with arthritis: Who’s attending? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016. 10.1002/acr.23129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.CDC. State-specific prevalence of no leisure-time physical activity among adults with and without doctor-diagnosed arthritis—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1641–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murphy LB, Theis KA, Brady TJ, et al. A health care provider’s recommendation is highly associated with taking an arthritis self-management course. Presented at the International Conference on Support for Self Management of Health; May 11–13, 2010; Stirling, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murphy L, Theis K, Brady T, et al. A health care provider’s recommendation is the most influential factor in taking an arthritis self-management course (SMC): a national perspective from the arthritis conditions health effects survey (ACHES). Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:S307–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Report to Congress: the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' evaluation of community-based wellness and prevention programs under section 4202 (b) of the Affordable Care Act. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2013. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/CommunityWellnessRTC.pdf
  • 22.Belza B, Shumway-Cook A, Phelan EA, Williams B, Snyder SJ, LoGerfo JP. The effects of a community-based exercise program on function and health in older adults: the EnhanceFitness Program. J Appl Gerontol 2006;25:291–306. 10.1177/0733464806290934 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA. Age adjustment using the 2000 projected US population. Healthy people statistical notes, no. 20. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2001. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ward BW, Schiller JS. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120203. 10.5888/pcd10.120203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sacks JJ, Harrold LR, Helmick CG, Gurwitz JH, Emani S, Yood RA. Validation of a surveillance case definition for arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:340–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nevitt MC. Obesity outcomes in disease management: clinical outcomes for osteoarthritis. Obes Res 2002;10(Suppl 1):33S–7S. 10.1038/oby.2002.187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey 2015: survey description. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES