Abstract
Most studies of genomic disorders have focused on patients with cognitive disability and/or peripheral nervous system defects. In an effort to broaden the phenotypic spectrum of this disease model, we assessed 155 autopsy samples from fetuses with well-defined developmental pathologies in regions predisposed to recurrent rearrangement, by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. We found that 6% of fetal material showed evidence of microdeletion or microduplication, including three independent events that likely resulted from unequal crossing-over between segmental duplications. One of the microdeletions, identified in a fetus with multicystic dysplastic kidneys, encompasses the TCF2 gene on 17q12, previously shown to be mutated in maturity-onset diabetes, as well as in a subset of pediatric renal abnormalities. Fine-scale mapping of the breakpoints in different patient cohorts revealed a recurrent 1.5-Mb de novo deletion in individuals with phenotypes that ranged from congenital renal abnormalities to maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5. We also identified the reciprocal duplication, which appears to be enriched in samples from patients with epilepsy. We describe the first example of a recurrent genomic disorder associated with diabetes.
Genomic disorders result from nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between low-copy repeats and occur in ∼1 in 1,000 live births.1 The phenotypes of many of the known genomic disorders include developmental delay and mental retardation (e.g., velocardiofacial syndrome, Williams-Beurens syndrome, and Smith-Magenis syndrome). Therefore, many of the large screens for novel genomic disorders have focused on individuals with mental retardation.2–7 Previously, we developed a BAC array targeted to 130 “rearrangement hotspots,” defined as regions of the genome with an architecture suggestive of a susceptibility to recurrent microdeletion and/or duplication. Use of this array to evaluate 316 unaffected individuals8,9 and 290 individuals with idiopathic mental retardation7 resulted in the identification of copy-number polymorphisms, as well as novel genomic disorders.
Interestingly, despite an architecture that predicts a susceptibility to rearrangement, many of these 130 hotspot regions have never been observed as a copy-number variant in the unaffected and developmentally delayed individuals studied. We hypothesized that these “invariant” regions contain genes essential for normal morphogenesis and are involved in pathways other than those critical for normal cognitive development. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated DNA from fetal samples with one or more congenital anomalies for which the pathology was well documented. We reasoned that rearrangements resulting in major malformations or incompatibility with life would be found in such prenatal cases. We show here that one of these microdeletions associated with a fetal sample with grossly abnormal, dysplastic multicystic kidneys is the result of a recurrent rearrangement of 17q12 mediated by segmental duplications. De novo deletions with identical breakpoints are found in living patients with a range of phenotypes, from those with renal abnormalities10,11 to individuals whose primary diagnosis is maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5 (MODY5 [MIM 137920]).12 This is the first example of a recurrent genomic disorder associated with diabetes and one of the few examples of a contiguous gene-deletion syndrome without mental retardation. We also discovered the reciprocal duplication in individuals with epilepsy and/or mental retardation, as well as in unaffected individuals. These data suggest considerable variability in expressivity of the phenotype and widen the spectrum of diseases caused by genomic disorders.
Material and Methods
DNA Samples
DNA samples were obtained from prenatal autopsy specimens (n=155) and from individuals with renal disease and/or MODY5, with the appropriate institutional-review-board approval. Fetal liver tissue was obtained from Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center. All samples were from fetuses that underwent autopsy after elective termination or fetal demise between 1995 and 2006. DNA was extracted using Gentra PureGene DNA extraction kit. The renal pediatric and MODY5 cases represent patients who were analyzed previously for TCF2 molecular abnormalities.10–12 Two control groups were used to assess the extent of normal copy-number variation. The first control group consisted of 316 unrelated individuals (HapMap and Diversity population) who had been tested using the same BAC duplication microarray.8,9 A second control population, comprising 960 unrelated white adults (aged 40–70 years) from the United States, was genotyped using the HumanHap300 Genotyping BeadChips (Illumina), which consists of ∼317,000 HapMap SNPs spread throughout the genome. Each individual was enrolled in the Pharmacogenomics and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease (PARC) study, which aims to identify genetic contributors to the variable efficacy of statin drugs for cardiovascular disease (PharmGKB: PARC Profile). Hybridizations, data analysis, and copy-number analysis, with particular reference to chromosome 17q12 (137 probes within the critical region), were performed according to published protocols.13
Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH)
DNA was hybridized to a custom BAC array consisting of 2,007 clones targeted to regions of the genome flanked by segmental duplications, as described elsewhere.9 This array includes all regions associated with known genomic disorders and an additional ∼105 regions with similar genomic architecture. Because of the targeted nature of this array, we will not detect rearrangements that are not mediated by segmental duplications. Regions were scored as copy-number variant if the log2 ratio of two or more consecutive clones each exceeded twice the SD of the autosomal clones in dye-swap replicate experiments.7 We used a whole-genome tiling path array containing 32,433 BAC clones14 or a custom oligonucleotide array (NimbleGen Systems), consisting of 385,000 isothermal probes (length 45–75 bp) covering several chromosomal regions, including a 3-Mb region of chromosome 17q12 (55,888 probes; mean density 1 probe per 53 bp) to refine the breakpoints. Hybridizations were performed as described elsewhere,15 and a single unaffected male (GM15724 [Coriell]) was used as reference. Oligonucleotide array data are available at the Human Genome Structural Variation Project Web site.
Quantitative PCR
Oligonucleotides for real-time quantitative PCR assays were selected using Primer3 software.16 Primer sequences (5′→3′) for exon 1 primers are as follows: forward primer ATTTCCTGGTGCGAGTTTTG and reverse primer CAGGGGATGACTCCTGAAGA. PCRs were performed in an LC480 machine (Roche) by use of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions were 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 20 s. Reactions were performed in triplicate, with a final reaction volume of 10 μl containing 10 ng DNA, 1.6 μM primer, and 5 μl SYBR Green Master Mix. Control primers were placed in the albumin gene.
FISH
Metaphase spreads and nuclei were obtained from phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral lymphocytes of individuals 6498 and 6840 by standard procedures. FISH experiments were performed using fosmid WIBR2-6022g13 (NCBI May 2004 assembly [hg17] coordinates chr17:32364308–32399464), directly labeled by nick-translation with Cy3-dCTP (Perkin-Elmer), as described elsewhere,17 with minor modifications. Fosmids WIBR2-3001A12 (hg17 coordinates chr17:32309158–32347025; not duplicated in either case) and WIBR2-946N02 (hg17 coordinates chr17:33156592–33197819; duplicated in both cases) were used in control experiments.
Results
Fetal Anomalies and Genomic Rearrangements
We evaluated 155 fetuses with one or more congenital anomalies and no known cytogenetic abnormalities in this study (128 with normal karyotype, 12 of whom also had normal FISH results for 22q11 deletion, and 27 of whom had no karyotype information reported). To minimize false-positive results, we focused on microdeletions and microduplications defined by two or more adjacent BAC clones on our targeted array that were not observed as copy-number polymorphisms in >400 control individuals either on our BAC array platform8,9 or in studies of full-tiling path microarrays.18,19 We identified nine individuals (6%) with detectable deletions or duplications, eight of which may be pathogenic (table 1). Analysis using whole-genome tiling-path BAC arrays or high-density oligonucleotide arrays allowed refinement of the breakpoints. Three of the alterations are microdeletions with breakpoints in flanking segmental duplications: a 1.8-Mb deletion at 17q12 in a fetus with multicystic renal dysplasia (FA-275 in fig. 1), a 2.5-Mb deletion at 15q25.2 in a fetus with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and mild hydrocephalus (fig. 2b), and a 2-Mb deletion at 16p13.11 in a fetus with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, cleft lip, preauricular tags, and two cleft vertebrae (fig. 2c). In each case, the regions flanking the microdeletions are polymorphic in copy number (on the basis of an analysis of 270 unaffected individuals). The smallest rearrangement we detected was a 157-kb duplication (case FA-142 in fig. 2a).
Table 1. .
hg17 Coordinates |
|||||||
Case | Fetal Anomalies | Alteration | Start | Stop | Alteration Size | Verificationa | Comments |
FA-142 | Multicystic dysplastic kidneys | dup17q23 | 55061600 | 55218400 | 157 kb | Oligo array | Proximal breakpoint in CLTC gene; distal breakpoint in TMEM49; alteration within hotspot region but not mediated by segmental duplications (fig. 2a) |
FA-180 | Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and craniofacial and vertebral anomalies | del16p13.11 | 14780000 | 16770000 | 1.9 Mb | Oligo array | Breakpoints in polymorphic segmental duplications (fig. 2c) |
FA-275 | Multicystic dysplastic kidneys | del17q12 | 31836750 | 33582750 | 1.8 Mb | Oligo array | Breakpoints in polymorphic segmental duplications (see text for details) |
FA-328 | Organomegaly and intrauterine demise | Trisomy 9p, mosaic | p-arm | None | Prenatal karyotype reported as normal; evidence of trisomy 9p in fetal liver tissue (average log2 ratio of 0.34 for 9p clones and 0.53 for X clones); no trisomy in placental tissue from same case. | ||
FA-430 | Multicystic dysplastic kidneys | 47, XXY | X chromosome | None | Likely an incidental finding; fetal karyotype was not obtained because culture failed to grow | ||
FA-441 | Holoprosencephaly | dup5p15.2-pterdel7q36.1-qter | 1148600000 | 12100000158550000 | 12.1 Mb10 Mb | 32K | Likely unbalanced translocation; prenatal karyotype reported as normal; 7q deleted region contains SHH gene, known to cause holoprosencephaly |
FA-457 | Tetralogy of Fallot | del1p36.23-p36.13dup1p36.13 | 870000016450000 | 1600000016950000 | 7.3 Mb500 kb | 32K | Large interstitial deletion with additional 500-kb duplication at proximal breakpoint; breakpoints in unique sequence |
FA-460 | Craniosynostosis and gastrointestinal and limb anomalies | dupXq13 | 71600000 | 71800000 | 200 kb | 32K | Proximal breakpoint in unique sequence; distal in large duplicated region |
FA-602 | Congenital diaphragmatic hernia | del15q25 | 81011700 | 83540700 | 2.5 Mb | Oligo array | Breakpoints in polymorphic segmental duplications; region contains 22 genes (fig. 2b) |
32K = whole-genome tiling-path BAC array (n=32,433 BAC clones) (see the “Material and Methods” section).
MODY5: A Recurrent 17q12 Microdeletion Disorder
Case FA-275 represents a fetus with bilateral multicystic renal dysplasia, bilateral ureteropelvic junction stenosis, atretic right ureter, and hypoplastic bladder (fig. 1a). We detected a deletion of seven BACs spanning nearly 2 Mb of sequence on our targeted BAC array (fig. 1b). Fine mapping with a customized oligonucleotide array (average probe spacing 53 bp) showed that the deleted region spans 1.8 Mb and involves 19 known genes, including CCL3L1 (MIM 601395), CCL4L1 (MIM 603782), and TBC1D3 (MIM 607741), which are present in multiple copies (fig. 1c). Because of copy-number polymorphism in the flanking regions (figs. 3 and 4), it is difficult to predict the exact breakpoints of the deletion; however, both proximal and distal breakpoints are within segmental-duplication clusters with multiple regions of high identity—the most significant has >99% identity across 76 kb (hg17 coordinates chr17:31808172–31883983 and chr17:33529232–33604211).
The deleted region in case FA-275 includes the TCF2 gene (MIM 189907), mutations of which are known to cause MODY5,20 as well as both pediatric11,21 and prenatally detectable10 cystic renal disease. One third of a series of MODY5-affected individuals with TCF2 alterations have deletions of the entire TCF2 gene and surrounding sequence.12 Similar deletions have been found in pediatric cystic renal disease.10,11,21 Because the deletion in case FA-275 appeared to overlap the deletions reported in patients with MODY5, we used oligonucleotide arrays to refine the deletion breakpoints in five patients with pediatric renal disease without diabetes and three patients with MODY5 (diabetes and renal disease) who had previously been shown to have deletions encompassing the TCF2 gene (table 2).
Table 2. .
Individual or Case |
Del or Dup | Renal Phenotype | Diabetes, Age at Onset (years) | Cognitive Ability | Seizures | Other | De Novo or Inherited |
FA-275 | Del | MCDK, prenatal onset | NA | NA | NA | … | Unknown |
FR40 | Del | Single kidney with isolated cysts, onset at age 7 years | Yes, 22 | Normal | None | Cryptorchidism, pancreatic atrophy, and elevated liver enzymes (2.5×) | De novo |
FR92 | Del | Bilateral cysts and hypoplasia, onset at age 1 year | Yes, 10 | Normal | None | Elevated liver enzymes (2×) | De novo |
FR99 | Del | Abnormal renal function, onset at age 27 years | Yes, 23 | Normal | None | Elevated liver enzymes (4×) | De novo |
FR45 | Del | Bilateral MCDK, prenatal onset; GFR < 80 | Noa | Normal | None | … | Inherited |
FR12 | Del | Prenatal hyperechogenic kidneys and postnatal MCDK; GFR=95 | No | Normal | None | … | De novo |
FR37 | Del | Prenatal hyperechogenic kidneys and postnatal MCDK, pelvic dilatation, and hyperuricemia | No | Normal | None | … | De novo |
FR35 | Del | Prenatal hyperechogenic kidneys and bilateral MCDK; GFR=96 | No | Normal | None | … | De novo |
FR09 | Del | Bilateral MCDK, prenatal onset | No | Normal | None | … | De novo |
IMR379 | Dup | None known | No | MR | Unknown | … | Unknownb |
5812 | Dup | None known | No | MR | Focal complex | … | Inherited |
6498 | Dupc | None known | No | MR | Focal complex | … | Inheritedd |
Note.— Del = deletion; Dup = duplication; GFR = glomerular filtration rate (in ml/min/1.73 m2); MCDK = multicystic dysplastic kidneys; MR = mental retardation.
The father of FR45 has diabetes (onset at age 27 years) and renal cysts, and the brother of FR45 also has MCDK (prenatal onset).
Presumed inheritance from the father, who was unavailable for analysis.
Duplication of TCF2 and LHX1 genes (see text).
TCF2 duplication inherited from the unaffected mother; duplication of LHX1 is likely also inherited from the mother, who is mosaic (see text).
Our results show that four of the five pediatric patients and all three of the patients with MODY5 have deletions that are nearly identical to that of our fetal case, with breakpoints in all cases mapping to flanking segmental-duplication blocks (fig. 1c). Case FR09 provides the greatest breakpoint resolution, with a proximal breakpoint at 31,835,000 ± 1 kb and a distal breakpoint at 33,357,000 ± 1 kb defining the common minimal deletion region. The extensive and variable copy-number polymorphism in the flanking regions (figs. 3 and 4) and the presence of a sequence assembly gap make it difficult to define the breakpoints more precisely in the other three cases, but they all occur within the large segmental duplication blocks (proximal: 31,500,000–31,900,000 bp; distal: 33,300,000–33,600,000 bp). One case (FR35) is atypical, with a larger de novo deletion at least 2.1 Mb in size. The distal breakpoint is in unique sequence ∼33 kb distal to the TCF2 gene (hg17 coordinate ∼33212500), suggesting this deletion arose from a mechanism other than NAHR. These results show that the 17q12 deletion is a recurrent genomic disorder with breakpoints in flanking segmental duplications that results in renal disease and diabetes.
Reciprocal 17q12 Duplication
We previously identified a duplication of the 17q12 region in a patient with idiopathic mental retardation (IMR379) and an affected sibling.7 We have identified two additional patients with mild-to-moderate mental retardation, epilepsy, and focal cortical dysplasia who have overlapping duplications on 17q12 by BAC array CGH (table 2). Oligonucleotide microarray CGH analysis of these three individuals shows that two individuals, IMR379 and 5812, have duplications of the entire 17q12 region, with breakpoints mapping to the same duplication blocks associated with renal disease and MODY5 deletions (fig. 5a). These duplication events, therefore, represent the expected reciprocal duplication to the common 17q12 deletion and provide further evidence that these rearrangements are mediated by NAHR.22 Pedigree analysis of these families shows that dup17q12 can be stably transmitted meiotically (fig. 6). The duplication is present in all affected individuals in family 1 who we were able to test. However, apparently unaffected individuals in the family were also found to carry the duplication, so the pathological significance is unclear. It is possible that the duplication is a benign copy-number variant segregating with disease in this family. Alternatively, there may be incomplete penetrance of the seizure phenotype.
To assess the frequency of the 17q12 duplication in the general population, we analyzed a larger control group for copy-number variation of this locus (n=960 unrelated white individuals who had been genotyped with a high-density SNP Genotyping BeadChip for variable efficacy of statin-drug response by cardiovascular disease [R. Krauss and D. Nickerson, personal communication]). We identified a single individual with a duplication corresponding to the 1.5-Mb region (fig. 7), whereas no individuals with the deletion were observed. Combined with our previous analysis of 270 HapMap individuals, this suggests a slight enrichment of the 17q12 duplication among patients with mental retardation and/or epilepsy (2 of 380 affected individuals; 1 of 1,276 control individuals) but does not reach statistical significance (P=.13, by Fisher’s exact test).
Interestingly, the third patient (6498), who has mental retardation, focal cortical dysplasia, and focal seizures, has a smaller and apparently more complex duplication in which there is a 27-kb duplication encompassing the LHX1 gene (MIM 601999; hg17 coordinates chr17:32360000–32387000) and a 259-kb duplication corresponding to the TCF2 gene (hg17 coordinates chr17:33122000–33381000) (fig. 5a). The mother of patient 6498 is unaffected and also carries a duplication of the TCF2 gene. However, both oligonucleotide array CGH and real-time quantitative PCR of the 27-kb region encompassing LHX1 suggested that the mother does not carry the LHX1 duplication (fig. 5). Interphase FISH with peripheral blood lymphocytes from both the mother and daughter showed that the mother is mosaic for the duplication (28% of 135 nuclei), whereas the daughter has the LHX1 duplication in virtually all cells (98% of 138 nuclei) (fig. 5c).
Discussion
We have used a targeted approach to identify novel genomic disorders in individuals with congenital anomalies. Our results emphasize the importance of evaluating de novo structural-variation events in pediatric diseases other than mental retardation and the importance of duplication architecture as a predisposing factor for disease. We show that recurrent microdeletions of chromosome 17q12, which cause pediatric renal disease and MODY5, are mediated by flanking segmental duplications. The mechanism of recurrent deletion by NAHR explains the high rate of de novo TCF2 deletions detected in previous studies of pediatric renal disease and MODY5. Indeed, it has been estimated that de novo structural rearrangements may occur at a frequency of between 10−6 and 10−4 (100–10,000 times more frequently than de novo point mutations).23 The 17q12 deletion is the first genomic disorder that results in diabetes and is the third genomic disorder with significant renal involvement (the other two are juvenile nephronophthisis and polycystic kidney disease). This recurrent microdeletion will have a significant impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of renal disease and early-onset type II diabetes in children, and we recommend that evaluation of this microdeletion be considered early in the diagnostic workup for children with renal pathology.
The 17q12 deletion results in a wide range of phenotypes with considerable variability in expressivity. Individuals with nearly identical deletions can have severe renal disease detectable prenatally, renal disease detected in childhood, or MODY5 (usually diagnosed before the 4th decade). Previous studies suggest that, although the deletion is found in individuals at both ends of the phenotypic spectrum, those with earlier-onset disease are more likely to have a large genomic deletion than a point mutation in TCF2. Of those individuals with TCF2 alterations in three different series, 36% of individuals who presented with a MODY5 phenotype,12 64% of patients ascertained in childhood with renal abnormalities,11 and 89% of patients with renal disease detected by prenatal ultrasound (and who have not yet developed diabetes)10 had genomic deletions versus point mutations of TCF2. These results suggest that the microdeletion is associated with earlier onset of renal pathology. One of the genes in the 17q12 deleted region is LHX1, a limb homeodomain gene important for renal development in the mouse.24,25 It may be that haploinsufficiency of both TCF2 and LHX1—two genes important for renal development—influence earlier onset of renal disease than do point mutations in TCF2. However, some individuals with the deletion do have a milder phenotype, and individuals with a point mutation in TCF2 may have early-onset disease; this suggests that TCF2 is the major gene contributing to the phenotype in patients with deletion. In addition, there may be genetic modifiers outside the 17q12 deleted region that contribute to the phenotype.
Interestingly, we have also identified the reciprocal duplication of 17q12, which may be associated with epilepsy—a strikingly different phenotype than that associated with the deletion. A smaller, more complex duplication involving the TCF2 and LHX1 genes was found in another patient with focal cortical dysplasia and epilepsy, which suggests that one or both of these genes in the 17q12 region may be important for epilepsy and brain development. Although the known biology of LHX1 makes it a good candidate gene for abnormal brain development (i.e., the gene is expressed in human brain, it is required for migration of motor axons to the limb,26 and knockout mice have anencephaly25), the association of the duplication with disease is less clear than that of the deletion phenotype. Screening of 1,276 unaffected control subjects (see the “Material and Methods” section) found a single occurrence of this 1.5-Mb duplication (but not the reciprocal deletion), suggesting that this variant is rare in the unaffected population and is enriched in patients with mental retardation and epilepsy. One possible explanation is incomplete penetrance of the duplication-associated phenotype. Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity have been described for several genomic disorders, including 22q11 deletion27 and duplication28,29 syndromes. Additional studies will be required before a definitive association of the variant with disease can be stated, as opposed to a rare copy-number variant that fortuitously segregates in some families with affected individuals.
Finally, we find that the segmental duplications located at the breakpoints are polymorphic in copy number and structure among unaffected individuals. Similar variation has been noted in previous studies of genomic disorders. We propose that this variation may contribute to the susceptibility of individual genomes to rearrangement, wherein increased copy number in the flanking segmental duplications increases the likelihood of NAHR. Evaluation of parents in whom the deletion or duplication arose will help determine the contribution of flanking polymorphism to genomic rearrangement.
In summary, we have found novel microdeletions and duplications in a series of fetal samples with congenital anomalies other than mental retardation. Combined with recent studies of similar genetic variation in children in mental retardation and autism,7,30,31 we put forward the structural-variant disease hypothesis: large (>100-kb) structural genetic changes are not uncommon in germ cells and are more likely to be recurrent, under strong selective constraint, and distributed nonrandomly in the genome. Therefore, de novo events will have a significant impact on rare and common diseases in the population that cannot be tracked by traditional linkage-disequilibrium association mapping approaches. We advocate generalized screening of genomic “hotspot” regions of both parents and offspring for other pediatric diseases for which the genetic etiology is not well understood (including schizophrenia, asthma, and cardiovascular disease).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. Ronald Krauss and Debbie Nickerson, from the PARC project, for the use of Illumina SNP genotyping data, funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant U01 HL069757, and to all physicians who sent us patients for TCF2 analysis. This work was supported in part by NIH grant HD043569 (to E.E.E.) and grants from the Merck Research Laboratories (to A.J.S.) and the Innovation Funds of the Max Planck Society (to H.H.R.). Wilhelm Johannsen Centre for Functional Genome Research was established by the Danish National Research Foundation. E.E.E. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Web Resources
The URLs for data presented herein are as follows:
- Human Genome Structural Variation Project, http://humanparalogy.gs.washington.edu/structuralvariation/ (for oligonucleotide array data)
- Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for MODY5, CCL3L1, CCL4L1, TBC1D3, TCF2, and LHX1)
- PharmGKB: PARC Profile, http://www.pharmgkb.org/network/members/parc.jsp#team
References
- 1.Shaw CJ, Lupski JR (2004) Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease. Hum Mol Genet Spec 1 13:R57–R64 10.1093/hmg/ddh073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Vries BB, Pfundt R, Leisink M, Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Janssen IM, Reijmersdal S, Nillesen WM, Huys EH, Leeuw N, et al (2005) Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 77:606–616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Friedman JM, Baross A, Delaney AD, Ally A, Arbour L, Armstrong L, Asano J, Bailey DK, Barber S, Birch P, et al (2006) Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of genomic imbalance in children with mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 79:500–513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Pfundt R, de Leeuw N, Knight SJ, Regan R, Kooy RF, Reyniers E, Romano C, Fichera M, et al (2006) A new chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism. Nat Genet 38:999–1001 10.1038/ng1853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B, Buysse K, Vandesompele J, Melotte C, de Ravel T, Van Vooren S, Balikova I, Backx L, et al (2006) Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J Med Genet 43:625–633 10.1136/jmg.2005.039453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosenberg C, Knijnenburg J, Bakker E, Vianna-Morgante AM, Sloos W, Otto PA, Kriek M, Hansson K, Krepischi-Santos AC, Fiegler H, et al (2006) Array-CGH detection of micro rearrangements in mentally retarded individuals: clinical significance of imbalances present both in affected children and normal parents. J Med Genet 43:180–186 10.1136/jmg.2005.032268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharp AJ, Hansen S, Selzer RR, Cheng Z, Regan R, Hurst JA, Stewart H, Price SM, Blair E, Hennekam RC, et al (2006) Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome. Nat Genet 38:1038–1042 10.1038/ng1862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Locke DP, Sharp AJ, McCarroll SA, McGrath SD, Newman TL, Cheng Z, Schwartz S, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Altshuler DM, et al (2006) Linkage disequilibrium and heritability of copy-number polymorphisms within duplicated regions of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 79:275–290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey JA, Vallente RU, Pertz LM, Clark RA, Schwartz S, Segraves R, et al (2005) Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 77:78–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Decramer S, Parant O, Beaufils S, Clauin S, Guillou C, Kessler S, Aziza J, Bandin F, Schanstra JP, Bellanne-Chantelot C (2007) Anomalies of the TCF2 gene are the main cause of fetal bilateral hyperechogenic kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:923–933 10.1681/ASN.2006091057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ulinski T, Lescure S, Beaufils S, Guigonis V, Decramer S, Morin D, Clauin S, Deschenes G, Bouissou F, Bensman A, et al (2006) Renal phenotypes related to hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β (TCF2) mutations in a pediatric cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:497–503 10.1681/ASN.2005101040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bellanne-Chantelot C, Clauin S, Chauveau D, Collin P, Daumont M, Douillard C, Dubois-Laforgue D, Dusselier L, Gautier JF, Jadoul M, et al (2005) Large genomic rearrangements in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β (TCF2) gene are the most frequent cause of maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5. Diabetes 54:3126–3132 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peiffer DA, Le JM, Steemers FJ, Chang W, Jenniges T, Garcia F, Haden K, Li J, Shaw CA, Belmont J, et al (2006) High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res 16:1136–1148 10.1101/gr.5402306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ishkanian AS, Malloff CA, Watson SK, DeLeeuw RJ, Chi B, Coe BP, Snijders A, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Marra MA, et al (2004) A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat Genet 36:299–303 10.1038/ng1307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Pofahl NJ, Green RD, Eis PS, Nair P, Brothman AR, Stallings RL (2005) Analysis of chromosome breakpoints in neuroblastoma at sub-kilobase resolution using fine-tiling oligonucleotide array CGH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 44:305–319 10.1002/gcc.20243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132:365–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lichter P, Tang CJ, Call K, Hermanson G, Evans GA, Housman D, Ward DC (1990) High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones. Science 247:64–69 10.1126/science.2294592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, et al (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444:444–454 10.1038/nature05329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wong KK, deLeeuw RJ, Dosanjh NS, Kimm LR, Cheng Z, Horsman DE, MacAulay C, Ng RT, Brown CJ, Eichler EE, et al (2007) A comprehensive analysis of common copy-number variations in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 80:91–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horikawa Y, Iwasaki N, Hara M, Furuta H, Hinokio Y, Cockburn BN, Lindner T, Yamagata K, Ogata M, Tomonaga O, et al (1997) Mutation in hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β gene (TCF2) associated with MODY. Nat Genet 17:384–385 10.1038/ng1297-384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muller D, Klopocki E, Neumann LM, Mundlos S, Taupitz M, Schulze I, Ropers HH, Querfeld U, Ullmann R (2006) A complex phenotype with cystic renal disease. Kidney Int 70:1656–1660 10.1038/sj.ki.5001746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR (2002) Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 18:74–82 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02592-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lupski JR (2007) Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease. Nat Genet 39:S43–S47 10.1038/ng2084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pedersen A, Skjong C, Shawlot W (2005) Lim1 is required for nephric duct extension and ureteric bud morphogenesis. Dev Biol 288:571–581 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shawlot W, Behringer RR (1995) Requirement for Lim1 in head-organizer function. Nature 374:425–430 10.1038/374425a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kania A, Johnson RL, Jessell TM (2000) Coordinate roles for LIM homeobox genes in directing the dorsoventral trajectory of motor axons in the vertebrate limb. Cell 102:161–173 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00022-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Robin NH, Shprintzen RJ (2005) Defining the clinical spectrum of deletion 22q11.2. J Pediatr 147:90–96 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ensenauer RE, Adeyinka A, Flynn HC, Michels VV, Lindor NM, Dawson DB, Thorland EC, Lorentz CP, Goldstein JL, McDonald MT, et al (2003) Microduplication 22q11.2, an emerging syndrome: clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular analysis of thirteen patients. Am J Hum Genet 73:1027–1040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yobb TM, Somerville MJ, Willatt L, Firth HV, Harrison K, MacKenzie J, Gallo N, Morrow BE, Shaffer LG, Babcock M, et al (2005) Microduplication and triplication of 22q11.2: a highly variable syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 76:865–876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Malhotra D, Troge J, Lese-Martin C, Walsh T, Yamrom B, Yoon S, Krasnitz A, Kendall J, et al (2007) Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316:445–449 10.1126/science.1138659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Szatmari P, Paterson AD, Zwaigenbaum L, Roberts W, Brian J, Liu XQ, Vincent JB, Skaug JL, Thompson AP, Senman L, et al (2007) Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Genet 39:319–328 10.1038/ng1985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]